Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment
(Amendment No.   )

Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant 
Check the appropriate box:

Filed by the Registrantý


Filed by a Party other than the Registranto


Check the appropriate box:


o


Preliminary Proxy Statement



o


Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))



ý


Definitive Proxy Statement



o


Definitive Additional Materials



o


Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
PENN ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):


PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

N/A

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý


No fee required.

o


Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.


Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

2 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
A LETTER TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS
Dear Fellow Shareholders:
I am proud of the significant operational and financial milestones PENN Entertainment achieved in 2023 as our brands and businesses further evolved to meet the needs of our growing customer base. We executed across our retail footprint, transformed our digital business, invested in high growth projects, pioneered new technology, and advanced our corporate social responsibility (“CSR”) priorities. Our performance is underpinned by our talented team’s unwavering dedication to delivering superior integrated entertainment, casino and online sports betting and gaming experiences to our customers.
Best-in-Class Retail Operations Empower Our Growth Strategy
The continued strength and health of our retail business was evident in 2023, as we generated more than $2 billion in property-level EBITDAR. We delivered on our strategic targets and met our margin goals, all while navigating an uncertain macroeconomic environment. Led by our best-in-class operators, our regional gaming assets continue to deliver impressive and consistent results, providing a foundation for growth initiatives that are key to our long-term omnichannel strategy.
In 2023, we broke ground on four exciting new retail growth projects with an estimated overall budget of approximately $850 million. We are expanding our offerings at two of our best performing properties, Hollywood Columbus in Ohio and the M Resort in Las Vegas, Nevada, with the addition of a hotel at Columbus and a second hotel tower at the M Resort. In the Chicagoland market, we are relocating our riverboat licenses in Aurora and Joliet to create new best-in-class regional destinations in superior locations. We expect to complete these projects in the first half of 2026 and anticipate that expanding and modernizing these key properties will generate a strong return on our investment and create long-term value for our shareholders.
Transformative Strategic Alliance with ESPN Expands Our Value Proposition
After thoughtful deliberation and consideration of various alternatives by our Board, we made a significant pivot in our digital strategy in 2023, leading to our exclusive strategic alliance with ESPN, the undisputed leader in U.S. sports media. This transformative deal and the subsequent launch of ESPN BET™ last November, in alliance with ESPN, has already propelled our online business, delivering impressive download volumes, new registrations, and betting activity. While we are still in the early innings, ESPN BET is helping us reach new demographics of sports fans and grow the overall sports betting market in the U.S. We are now live in 18 states, and ESPN BET will be available to approximately 46% of the U.S. population following our launch in New York, which is expected in the second half of 2024. The early success of ESPN BET has also expanded our digital database by over 50% and bolstered our Hollywood-branded iCasino business through in-app cross-sell opportunities. We continue to see a growing convergence between sports media and sports betting, and our alliance with ESPN provides us with a compelling opportunity to fully capitalize on our investments in technology to create a differentiated sports betting and media experience, a truly unique and seamless value proposition for sports fans.
While we are pleased with the early ESPN BET adoption and engagement results, our primary focus in 2024 will be expanding our product offerings and introducing bespoke features to deliver a best-in-class experience for ESPN BET users. This will come from a combination of deep media and fantasy app integrations with ESPN, something no competitor in the industry can replicate, coupled with more expansive parlay and same game parlay offerings and an enhanced Hollywood-branded iCasino product. Strong execution in these areas will result in higher retention, share of wallet and spend per user.
Our Technology Investments and Growing Database Bolster Our Omnichannel Growth Strategy
Prior to the ESPN BET launch, our Interactive division achieved a major milestone in July with the full-scale migration of our U.S. online business to our proprietary technology platform. We acquired this technology platform in connection with our acquisition of theScore in 2021 and subsequently went live in 2022 in Ontario with strong results under theScore BET® brand. This seamless technology migration in the U.S. marked the culmination of a multi-year effort to bring all aspects of our North American online sports betting and iCasino operations in-house, and it would not have been possible without our strong team of talented engineers and product managers. Operating on our own technology has improved our efficiency, streamlined our ability to quickly introduce new features, and most importantly, provided us with complete control over our product roadmap as we work with ESPN to provide a best-in-class, fully integrated media and betting experience.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 3
A LETTER TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS

The launch of ESPN BET has further bolstered our industry-leading loyalty program, PENN Play™, which now includes more than 29 million members. Nearly one third of new customers acquired through the initial launch of ESPN BET are located within 50 miles of one or more of our 43 properties – underpinning the advantages of our omnichannel-focused strategy. Our investments in technology have also led to the success of our market leading 3C’s (cashless, cardless, contactless) offering, which is now deployed at 21 properties across the nation, representing approximately 70% of our retail EBITDAR.
World-Class Technology Leadership Team and Valuable Board Refreshment
To help accelerate our technology and product improvements, we recently announced the hiring of Aaron LaBerge as the Company’s first-ever Chief Technology Officer. Mr. LaBerge brings more than 20 years of experience at The Walt Disney Company, most recently serving as President and Chief Technology Officer for both Disney Entertainment and ESPN. In his new role, he will be responsible for driving technology strategy and execution for PENN, while leading a multinational team of technologists and serving as the key business leader for the Company’s Interactive division. To help guide and inform our growing technology initiatives, we recently appointed Anuj Dhanda as an independent director. Mr. Dhanda serves as EVP, Chief Technology & Transformation Officer for Albertsons Companies, and he brings extensive technology, cybersecurity and business transformation experience to our Board.
Focused on Driving Sustainable Shareholder Value Creation
Our Company has a long-term track record of creating shareholder value through a relentless focus on delivering best-in-class margins, accretive M&A, organic growth and return on invested capital. While we are disappointed with our recent stock performance, we remain confident that the strategic investments we have made in our Interactive business, together with our four retail growth projects, are key to fortifying our omnichannel strategy, providing us with a solid foundation for future growth and long-term shareholder value.
Lastly, our Company’s success relies on the quality and development of our over 23,000 team members and our reputation as a well-regarded member of the communities in which we operate. I’m extremely proud of the strides we have collectively made to further our CSR objectives. Across the Company we donated more than $8 million in support of local charities and veterans-focused organizations in 2023, and our team members throughout North America volunteered over 9,500 hours with organizations that serve our local communities. We also continued to advance our sustainability initiatives by completing our first Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions inventory, one of the many steps we are taking to ensure that we remain good stewards of our planet’s natural resources.
On behalf of myself, our Board and our leadership team, I would like to thank you, our valued shareholders, for your continued investment, support and confidence. 2024 is sure to be another exciting year at PENN Entertainment.


Sincerely,

Jay Snowden
CEO & President

TABLE OF CONTENTS

4 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

DATE AND TIME
Tuesday, June 4, 2024
10 a.m. Eastern Time

LOCATION
Live webcast accessible at:
www.virtualshareholdermeeting .com/PENN2024

RECORD DATE
April 5, 2024
Voting Matters
At or before the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“Annual Meeting”), we ask that you vote on the following items:
PROPOSAL
​BOARD VOTE
RECOMMENDATION
PAGE REFERENCE
Proposal 1: Election of Class I Directors

FOR each Nominee
Proposal 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

FOR
Proposal 3: Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of Named Executive Officers

FOR

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 5
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT — HOW TO VOTE:

VIA THE INTERNET
Go to www.proxyvote.com,
available 24/7

BY TELEPHONE
Use the toll-free number shown on your
Proxy Card or Voting Instruction Form
and follow the recorded instructions

BY MAIL
Mark, sign, date and return the enclosed
Proxy Card and related instructions in
the postage-paid envelope

DURING THE MEETING
Vote through the virtual portal at www.virtualshareholdermeeting .com/PENN2024
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Material for the Annual Meeting to be Held on June 4, 2024.
Please note that we are furnishing proxy materials and access to this Proxy Statement to our shareholders via our website instead of mailing printed copies. This reduces our impact on the environment and helps us save costs.
Beginning on April 23, 2024, we will make available to each of our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials and vote online. If you attend the Annual Meeting virtually, you may withdraw your proxy and vote online during the Annual Meeting.
Your vote is important. We encourage you to vote promptly, regardless of whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,

Christopher Rogers
Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer and Secretary
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, April 23, 2024
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 4, 2024: Our Proxy Statement and 2023 Annual Report are available free of charge on our website at https://investors. pennentertainment.com/reports-filings/sec-filings. In addition, our shareholders may access this information, as well as submit their voting instructions, at www.proxyvote.com by having their proxy card and related instructions in hand.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

6 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX OF FREQUENTLY REQUESTED INFORMATION
 (1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 (2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 (3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 (4)
 Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 
 (5)Total fee paid:

o


Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o


Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.



(1)


Amount Previously Paid:
 (2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 
 (3)Filing Party:
 (4)
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Date Filed:
PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 7

Table

This Proxy Statement contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Contents

LOGO

825 Berkshire Boulevard, Suite 200
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania 19610



NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Tothe Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements can be held on June 2, 2016



NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVENidentified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “expects,” “believes,” “estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “goal,” “seeks,” “may,” “will,” “should,” or “anticipates” or the negative or other variations of these or similar words, or by discussions of future events, strategies or risks and uncertainties. Specifically, forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding: future revenue and Adjusted EBITDAR; the Company’s expectations of future results of operations and financial conditions, the scale and timing of the Company’s product and technology investments; the Company’s expectations regarding results, and the impact of competition, in retail/mobile/online sportsbooks, iCasino, social gaming, and retail operations; the Company’s development and launch of its Interactive segment’s products in new jurisdictions and enhancements to existing Interactive segment products, including features and content for the ESPN BET and theScore Bet; the benefits of the Sportsbook Agreement between the Company and ESPN; the Company’s expectations regarding its Sportsbook Agreement with ESPN and the future success of its products; the Company’s expectations with respect to the integration and synergies related to the Company’s integration of theScore and the continued growth and monetization of the Company’s media business; the Company’s expectations with respect to the ongoing introduction and the potential benefits of the cashless, cardless and contactless (3C’s) technology; and the Company’s development projects. Such statements are all subject to risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances that could significantly affect the Company’s future financial results and business. Accordingly, the Company cautions that the 2016forward-looking statements contained herein should not be unduly relied upon and are qualified by important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected by such statements. Such factors include those factors discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, each as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company does not intend to update publicly any forward-looking statements except as required by law. Considering these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this Proxy Statement may not occur.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

8 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
About the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

DATE AND TIME
Tuesday, June 4, 2024
10 a.m. Eastern Time

LOCATION
Live webcast accessible at:
www.virtualshareholdermeeting .com/PENN2024

RECORD DATE
April 5, 2024
Voting Matters
At or before the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“Annual Meeting”), we ask that you vote on the following items:
PROPOSAL
​BOARD VOTE
RECOMMENDATION
PAGE REFERENCE
Proposal 1: Election of Class I Directors

FOR each Nominee
Proposal 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

FOR
Proposal 3: Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of Named Executive Officers

FOR
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT — HOW TO VOTE:


VIA THE INTERNET
Go to www.proxyvote.com,
available 24/7


BY TELEPHONE
Use the toll-free number shown on your
Proxy Card or Voting Instruction Form
and follow the recorded instructions


BY MAIL
Mark, sign, date and return the enclosed
Proxy Card and related instructions in
the postage-paid envelope


DURING THE MEETING
Vote through the virtual portal at www.virtualshareholdermeeting .com/PENN2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 9
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
General
The board of directors (the “Board of Directors” or “Board”) of PENN Entertainment, Inc. (“PENN Entertainment,” “PENN,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” and “our”) is soliciting proxies to be voted at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "Annual Meeting"“Annual Meeting”). This proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) provides the information shareholders need to know to vote by proxy or in person (virtually) at the Annual Meeting.
Shareholders do not need to attend (virtually) the Annual Meeting to vote. If, at the close of Penn National Gaming, Inc. (the "Company"),business on April 5, 2024, you were a Pennsylvania corporation,shareholder of record or held shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, you may vote your shares by proxy via the Internet, by telephone or by mail. For shares held through a broker, bank or other nominee, you may vote by submitting voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. Please refer to information from your broker, bank or other nominee on how to submit voting instructions.
The Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday, June 2, 2016, at 10 a.m., local time,a “virtual meeting” of shareholders, which will be conducted exclusively online via audio webcast. You will be able to attend the virtual meeting online by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PENN2024. You also will be able to vote your shares electronically at the officesvirtual meeting. PENN Entertainment believes that hosting a virtual meeting will enable greater shareholder attendance and participation. Importantly, the virtual meeting has been designed to provide the same rights to participate as you would have at an in-person meeting. Additional information about how to vote and participate at our virtual meeting can be found at the end of Ballard Spahr LLP, 1735 Market Street, 51st Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103this Proxy Statement under “About the Meeting: Questions and Answers.”
PENN Entertainment is utilizing the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) rule that allows companies to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we mailed to our shareholders a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice of Availability”) instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials (including the proxy card (the “Proxy Card”), the Proxy Statement, and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the following purposes:fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 (“2023 Annual Report”)) on or about April 23, 2024. We also provided access to our proxy materials over the Internet beginning on that date. The Notice of Availability contained instructions on how to access the Proxy Statement and the 2023 Annual Report and how to vote online or by toll-free number. After receiving the Notice of Availability, all shareholders can access the proxy materials over the Internet and request to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail. Additionally, shareholders can access a copy of the proxy materials at www. proxyvote.com.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

    1.
    10 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
    PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
    Our Company

    ESPN & theScoreBEST-IN-CLASS REGIONAL CASINOSCUTTING-EDGE TECHNOLOGY
    Leveraging leading sports media brands to expand our digital footprint through organic cross-sell opportunitiesLeading properties in a geographically diversified portfolio creates sustained customer engagement and loyaltyFully integrated sports media, sports betting and iCasino platforms drive growth and customer retention

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 11
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
2023 Performance Highlights
2023 was a year of significant operational and financial achievements for PENN. Our retail business achieved strong property-level margins, generating more than $2 billion in property-level EBITDAR, and we broke ground on all four of our exciting retail growth projects in Illinois, Ohio and Nevada. Our regional gaming assets delivered impressive results, providing a foundation for growth initiatives in our Interactive segment and facilitating our long-term omnichannel strategy.
It was also a transformative year for our Interactive division. In July, we successfully completed a full-scale migration of our online sports betting business to our proprietary technology platform across 17 states. Importantly, this migration provides us with full control of our product and technology roadmap, allowing us to quickly introduce enhancements for our Interactive offerings while maximizing cross-sell opportunities with our retail business. Then, in August, we entered into a long-term strategic alliance with ESPN, Inc. and ESPN Enterprises, Inc. (together, “ESPN”), the undisputed leader in U.S. sports media, securing the exclusive right to use the ESPN brand for our U.S. online sports betting offering. Finally, in November, we successfully completed a rebrand of our online sports betting product and launched ESPN BET across 17 states to very strong customer demand.
We are constantly looking for new strategic opportunities to drive long-term shareholder value, as demonstrated through our transformative alliance with ESPN and our four exciting retail growth projects in Illinois, Ohio and Nevada, which are all set to open by 2026. The continued strength of our retail business provides us with a solid foundation to strategically deploy capital into our high-growth digital business, which is a critical element of our value creation strategy. To this end, our ability to accelerate growth by leveraging the leading sports media brands in the United States (ESPN) and Canada (theScore) is key to our omnichannel strategy, positioning us to significantly expand our digital footprint and efficiently grow our customer base across our retail, Interactive and entertainment verticals.
Looking ahead, we believe that our media and content ecosystem, together with our retail, online sports betting and online gaming channels, position PENN for growth and strengthen our position as a leading North America gaming operator. In 2024, we remain focused on maximizing the value-creation opportunities presented by our omnichannel strategy, leveraging innovative new integrations with ESPN and launching ESPN BET in new jurisdictions, including North Carolina (in March) and New York (later this year). We will also continue to focus on reimagining our properties through the use of new technologies and strategic capital deployment, which will allow us to further enhance customer experiences and better appeal to our growing digital customer database.

(1)
Reflects sum of Adjusted EBITDAR for our retail operating segments (Northeast, Midwest, South, West).
(2)
Reflects the sum of total revenues for our retail operating segments (Northeast, Midwest, South, West).
(3)
Property-level margin is property-level Adjusted EBITDAR divided by total retail revenue.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

12 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Our Board of Directors
Our Board is composed of highly experienced directors who have led, advised, and established leading organizations and institutions. Our directors have the experience and skill sets that collectively add significant value to the strategic decisions made by the Company, and which enable them to provide oversight of management to ensure accountability to our shareholders. We believe our Board possesses the right balance between long-term understanding of our business and fresh external perspectives. With the addition of three new directors in the last four years, we have ensured diversity of backgrounds and perspectives within the boardroom. In addition to demographic diversity, our directors have extensive backgrounds as entrepreneurs, operational, financial and technology experts, investors, advisors, and public company and nonprofit board members.
Snapshot of Board Profile and Diversity

(1)
PENN Entertainment’s Board and Committee leaders are: (i) Jane Scaccetti (Audit Committee Chair); (ii) Barbara Shattuck Kohn (Compensation Committee Chair); (iii) Marla Kaplowitz (Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair); (iv) Thomas Auriemma (Compliance Committee Chair); (v) Barbara Shattuck Kohn (Lead Independent Director); and (vi) David Handler (Board Chair). Each of these Board and Committee leaders are independent directors except for Mr. Auriemma who serves as an independent non-director member of the Compliance Committee. Mr. Auriemma is the Company’s former Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer and former Director of the Division of Gaming Enforcement in New Jersey, with over 30 years of experience as a gaming regulator in the State of New Jersey.
(2)
As self-identified.
(3)
Each graphic above excludes John Jacquemin, who is not standing for re-election at our 2024 Annual Meeting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 13
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Board and Committee Membership
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AGE (1)
DIRECTOR
SINCE
INDEPENDENTAUDITCOMPENSATION
NOMINATING
AND
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
COMPLIANCE (2)
# OF OTHER
PUBLIC COMPANY
BOARDS

Vimla
Black-Gupta
542021Y
0

Anuj
Dhanda
612024Y
1

David
Handler (3)
591994Y 0

Marla
Kaplowitz
582020Y
0

Ronald
Naples
782013Y
0

Saul
Reibstein
762011Y
1

Jane
Scaccetti
702015Y
 
0

Jay
Snowden (4)
482019​N0

Barbara
Shattuck
Kohn     
732004Y
1
Member
Chair
Audit Committee Financial Expert
(1)
Ages as of our 2024 Annual Meeting.
(2)
The Compliance Committee is chaired by an independent non-director member, Thomas N. Auriemma. Mr. Auriemma is the Company’s former Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer and former Director of the Division of Gaming Enforcement in New Jersey, with over 30 years of experience as a gaming regulator in the State of New Jersey.
(3)
Mr. Handler has served as Board Chair since 2019.
(4)
Mr. Snowden serves as our Chief Executive Officer and President.
(5)
Mr. Jacquemin is not standing for re-election at our 2024 Annual Meeting. Our Board will be reduced to nine directors effective as of our 2024 Annual Meeting.
(6)
This table reflects Committee assignments as of our 2024 Annual Meeting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

14 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Director Qualifications, Skills and Experience
PENN’s Board believes that having a diverse mix of directors with complementary qualifications, skill sets and attributes is essential to meeting its oversight responsibility. The table below summarizes the key qualifications, expertise and attributes possessed by one or more of PENN’s directors that are of particular relevance to the Company’s business, strategy and risk management structure, but does not encompass all qualifications, expertise and attributes of the Board. These factors were considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board in connection with this year’s director nomination process.

The above table of qualifications, skills and experience excludes Mr. Jacquemin, who is not standing for re-election at our 2024 Annual Meeting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 15
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Corporate Governance Highlights
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE BEST PRACTICES
ROBUST BOARD AND
COMMITTEE COMPOSITION
• Independent Board Chair
• Separate lead independent Director role
• All Directors (except CEO) are independent
• Each member of our Audit Committee qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the
SEC
• All Committees comprised solely of independent members
REFRESHED AND
DIVERSE BOARD
• Ongoing and thoughtful Board and Committee refreshment
• Three new independent directors appointed in the last four years with extensive marketing, strategy, technology, media, cybersecurity and digital transformation experience to effectively oversee growth
strategy
• 67%(1) diverse Board based on gender, race/ethnicity and LGBTQ+ identity
• 4 out of 6 board leadership roles are held by women
ALIGNMENT WITH
SHAREHOLDER INTERESTS
• Annual say-on-pay vote
• One class of common stock with equal voting rights
• Shareholder engagement program is overseen by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, with engagement efforts led by our Board Chair and the Chairs of our Compensation
Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
• Robust stock ownership guidelines for executives and directors
• Policies prohibiting hedging and pledging of PENN securities
EFFECTIVE RISK
OVERSIGHT
• Quarterly review of the Company’s risk profile, including risks associated with cybersecurity, human
capital management, DE&I, climate change and sustainability
• Compliance Committee with broad authority, comprised of independent directors and external non-
director compliance professional
• Cybersecurity oversight by Board and Audit Committee
• Independent directors meet regularly without management
• The Compliance Committee receives quarterly updates on whistleblower matters
• Comprehensive new director onboarding and continuing education program
SUCCESSION PLANNING
• Extensive CEO and executive leadership succession planning
• Robust director succession planning with focus on Board candidates with diverse experience, skills,
background, race/ethnicity and gender
• Annual Board and Committee self-evaluations
(1)
Excludes Mr. Jacquemin, who is not standing for re-election at our 2024 Annual Meeting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

16 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Off-season Shareholder Outreach and Engagement
Our Board considers shareholder feedback as a critical input in our annual corporate governance and executive compensation review process to promote transparency, develop a better understanding of shareholder perspectives, and support Board accountability. We maintain an active bi-annual, broad-based shareholder engagement program, which is led by our Board Chair and the Chairs of our Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, to solicit shareholder insights and feedback on a range of topics, including strategic priorities, capital allocation, corporate governance, executive compensation, and sustainability initiatives, as well as on other topics of importance to our shareholders. Perspectives of our shareholders are shared with relevant Committees and the full Board and inform the Board meeting agendas throughout the year.
OUTREACHENGAGEDDIRECTOR LED
57%Contacted shareholders representing 57% of the Company’s outstanding shares during the off-season47%Engaged with shareholders representing 47% of the Company’s outstanding shares during the off-seasonEngagement efforts led by our Independent Board Chair, Compensation Committee Chair and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair
Outstanding share ownership calculated as of September 6, 2023
Many shareholders who participated in the 2023 engagement meetings expressed appreciation of the Board’s thoughtful approach to shareholder dialogue and responsive actions adopted last year, including enhanced proxy disclosure and continued evolution of sustainability practices.
Key discussion topics:
• Corporate governance priorities• Cybersecurity risk management
• Capital allocation strategy and strategic initiatives• Executive compensation program
We are committed to maintaining high standards of corporate governance to promote long-term value creation, transparency and accountability to our shareholders. Proactively and in response to our shareholder priorities, we have adopted several governance, compensation and disclosure enhancements over the last three years.
RECENT GOVERNANCE
ENHANCEMENTS
(2023-2024)
• In early 2024, appointed Mr. Dhanda, a highly qualified independent director with extensive technology, cybersecurity and business transformation experience, to support our strategy of leveraging PENN’s significant reach to expand our digital footprint, drive our omnichannel strategy and efficiently grow and monetize our customer ecosystem
• Transitioned 2024 executive performance-based equity award program design to a 3-year performance period with 70% weighting allocation to financial metrics and made consistent changes to the final unvested portions of the 2023 and 2022 equity grants (covering the two and one-year remaining periods, respectively)
• Enhanced proxy disclosure around long-term incentive program metrics and earned performance-based equity awards for the last three performance cycles
• Established carbon abatement targets for 2024 and beyond
ROBUST TRACK
RECORD OF
PROACTIVE
GOVERNANCE
CHANGES
(2021-2022)
• Updated the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter to require an annual review of each director's independence to ensure recommendations are made to the Board based on annual findings
• Diversified performance metrics for the short- and long-term compensation plans
• Formalized shareholder engagement effort into a biannual shareholder engagement program overseen by the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
• Enhanced ESG practices and reporting:
  • Published EEO-1 data and the first SASB report
  • Finalized Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions assessment
• Established mandatory company-wide DE&I training for all employees
• PENN Interactive received the RG Check iGaming Accreditation from the Responsible Gambling Council (“RGC”), becoming the first U.S. operator to voluntarily undergo this process, which is widely regarded as one of the most comprehensive responsible gambling accreditation programs in the world
• Amended stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers to increase holding requirements from 5x to 6x base salary for the CEO and to align all other NEOs at 3x base salary
• Appointed Ms. Black-Gupta, a highly-qualified independent director with extensive marketing, strategy, media, and digital transformation experience, to support our strategy of offering integrated entertainment, sports content and casino gaming experiences

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 17
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Environmental Sustainability, Social Responsibility and
Corporate Governance Highlights



PLANET
We're dedicated to safeguarding
our natural resources
PEOPLE
We’re committed to DE&I
COMMUNITY
We’re challenging conventions in our
communities
• Established inaugural carbon abatement targets to reduce Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 25% by 2030.
• Updated our Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory and completed our initial Scope 3 greenhouse gas inventory.
• Completed PENN’s inaugural CDP climate change disclosure.
• Alignment with the Casino and Gaming Industry standard of the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”) reporting framework.
• Alignment with the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) reporting framework.
• Procured 100% carbon-free energy for properties located in deregulated jurisdictions.
• Diverted from landfills over 4,300 tons of paper, bailed cardboard, scrap metal, glass, plastic and aluminum waste and recycled over 2,000 pallets. Our racetracks diverted over 42,000 tons of agricultural waste to local farms.
• LEED certification targeted for two of our current development projects.
• PENN’s properties increased their procurement of cage-free eggs and reduced-antibiotic turkey.
• New Diverse Vendor Incubator Program implemented to help our current vendors enhance their capacity and grow their businesses.
• Exceeded our goals for diverse vendor procurement, with a total spend of over $108M – a 70% increase in companywide diverse spend since implementation of our program in 2020.
• Launched our new PENN Women initiative which is intended to increase inclusivity and provide allies and mentorship at all levels of our workforce.
• Expanded our talent development offerings in 2023 with the following pilot programs: HR Business Partner Cohort, Mentor Program, Early Career Leadership Academy and Mid-Career Leadership Academy, while relaunching our Gaming and Hospitality Cohorts.

• Our team members provided over 9,500 volunteer hours to help those in need.
• Created military scholarships at Penn State Berks and Alvernia University to help student veterans and active-duty military students in need of financial support to pursue their educational goals.
• Expect to create approximately 1,500 permanent jobs and 1,750 construction jobs as a result of our 4 retail growth projects, which all broke ground in 2023.
• Companywide we donated over $8M in support to local charities and veteran focused organizations and generated over $17 million in economic development grants.
PENN CARES FOR OUR PEOPLE, OUR COMMUNITIES, AND OUR PLANET

PENN Entertainment is deeply committed to good corporate citizenship and serving as a socially responsible partner to our team members, communities and customers. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees sustainability risks and initiatives which includes environmental and social responsibility, talent strategy and culture, and our DE&I initiatives.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

18 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Awards and Recognitions


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 19
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Executive Compensation
Significant portion of our target executive compensation is at risk. In 2023, 90% of our Chief Executive Officer’s total target compensation and 80% (on average) of our other Named Executive Officers’ total target compensation was at risk, subject to achievement of pre-set performance goals or tied to our long-term stock price performance.
2023 Target CEO Compensation
2023 Average
Other NEOs
Target Compensation



*
The above pie charts reflect the target percent values of new incentives awarded in 2023. These percent values vary somewhat from the grant values reflected in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table in the CD&A section below, because the values in those tables include portions of performance-based equity awards that reflect awards originally made in 2021, 2022, and 2023 (consistent with SEC disclosure rules).
2023 PAY AND PERFORMANCE ALIGNMENT
• In alignment with our commitment to a pay-for-performance philosophy, a significant portion of target executive compensation is at risk, delivered in the form of annual incentives, and long-term equity incentives.
• Following market-based compensation adjustments approved for our CEO and other NEOs for 2023, the regular rate of our target annual executive compensation levels remained slightly below the peer group median.
• Our short- and long-term incentives were earned at 99.1% and 108.1% of target, respectively, in alignment with our strong 2023 financial and operational performance results, which included successful implementation of financial and omnichannel initiatives prior to the unanticipated change in strategy related to our transformative strategic alliance with ESPN, resulting in the launch of ESPN BET in November 2023.
• Realizable compensation for 2023 was 64% of target compensation levels, reflecting the alignment of our executive pay opportunities with company performance. In response to input from shareholders in our engagement sessions, we enhanced this year’s disclosure of the performance metrics to detail threshold, target and maximum performance levels and achieved results.
• Additionally, in response to our shareholder preferences, we adopted a three-year performance cycle for the 2024 performance-based equity awards, with pre-determined rigorous financial performance metrics accounting for 70% of the overall metrics and the remaining 30% allocated to key quantitative operational targets. Similarly, we have applied the same multi-year performance metrics to the 2024 – 2025 outstanding portion of the 2023 performance-based equity awards.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

20 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
PROPOSAL 1:
ELECTION
OF CLASS I
DIRECTORS
Introduction
Our Board of Directors currently consists of ten members. John Jacquemin is not standing for re-election at our 2024 Annual Meeting, and as a result, our Board of Directors will be reduced to nine directors effective as of our 2024 Annual Meeting. The directors are organized into three classes, with each class elected to serve a three-year term.
At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will be asked to elect twoeach of the three Class III directors to serve until the 2019 Annual Meetingannual meeting of Shareholdersshareholders of the Company to be held in 2027 and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;

2.
To ratifyqualified. Our Board of Directors, upon the selectionrecommendation of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the 2016 fiscal year;

3.
To hold an advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers;our Nominating and

4.
To consider Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated David Handler, Vimla Black-Gupta and transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

        Only shareholders of record at the close of business on April 1, 2016 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any postponement or adjournment thereof.

        On April 19, 2016, we began mailing to certain shareholders a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 2, 2016 (the "Notice") containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our annual report and how to vote online. The notice of annual meeting, proxy statement and annual report are available at www.proxyvote.com.

        All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person. We look forward to either greeting you personally at the Annual Meeting or receiving your proxy.

By order of the Board of Directors,



Carl Sottosanti
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Wyomissing, Pennsylvania
April 19, 2016

Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, we encourage you to read this proxy statement and submit your proxy or voting instructions as soon as possible. You may vote by telephone or Internet (instructions are on your proxy card, voter instruction form or the Notice, as applicable) or, if you received your materials by mail, by completing, signing and mailing the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed envelope


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS


Page

LETTER FROM THE CEO TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS

1

2016 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY


2

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING


3

GOVERNANCE OF THE COMPANY


8

Corporate Governance Highlights

8

Board of Directors

9

Committees of the Board

14

Director Selection Process

17

Director Nominations by Shareholders

18

Compensation of Directors

19

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors

20

Shareholder Access Policy

20

PROPOSAL NO. 1 ELECTION OF CLASS II DIRECTORS


21

Information about Nominees and Other Directors

21

PROPOSAL NO. 2 RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE COMPANY'S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2016


25

PROPOSAL NO. 3 ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE COMPENSATION PAID TO THE COMPANY'S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


26

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


28

Executive Summary

29

Company Performance

31

Effect of the Spin-Off on Share Price and Compensation

33

Key Compensation Practices

33

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Senior Management

34

Shareholder Outreach and Say on Pay Vote

35

Executive Compensation Benchmarking Peer Group

36

Overview of Compensation Program

36

Analysis of Compensation

41

Changes to 2016 Compensation

42

Employment Agreements

42

Other Compensation Policies

43

Reconciliations and Non-GAAP Financial Measures

43

Compensation Committee Report

44

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION


45

COMPENSATION TABLES


46

Summary Compensation Table

46

All Other Compensation Table

47

2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

48

Outstanding 2015 Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

49

2015 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

51

2015 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

52

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

53

Employment Agreements

55

i


Table of Contents


Page

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT

59

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS


62

Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons

62

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

62

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT


63

OTHER MATTERS


64

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

64

Advance Notice Provision

64

Shareholder Proposals

64

Householding of Proxy Materials

64

ii


Table of Contents

LOGO


LETTER FROM THE CEO TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS

April 19, 2016



Dear Fellow Stockholder:


GRAPHIC

Timothy J. Wilmott
President and
Chief Executive
Officer


You are invited to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting of Penn National Gaming, Inc. (the "Company") to be held on Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at the offices of Ballard Spahr LLP, 1735 Market Street, 51st Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103.
The Company's strong 2015 financial results highlight the value of our strategies to grow market share and enhance operating efficiencies at our existing properties while pursuing growth and return focused expansion initiatives. From a financial perspective, the Company's revenues in 2015 increased 9.6%, which helped to increase cash flow from operations by 52.1% (to $399.0 million) and adjusted EBITDA by 12.2% (to $796.3 million), while net income increased from a prior year loss to positive net income of approximately $0.7 million.* This performance was driven by the opening of Massachusetts' first commercial gaming facility in June 2015, Plainridge Park Casino, as well as the Company's improved performance in many of our markets.
With our vision for continued near- and long-term growth, the Company also completed several other strategic initiatives in 2015, including the acquisition of Tropicana Las Vegas and the establishment of new business lines to support our interactive gaming strategy and Prairie State Gaming, our newly acquired Illinois video gaming terminal operator. The Tropicana Las Vegas acquisition fulfills our longstanding goal of acquiring the right property on the Las Vegas Strip to leverage our database of almost 3 million regional gaming customers. Reflecting these achievements, the Company's share price appreciated by nearly 17% in 2015, to $16.02 at year-end.
We believe the Company remains favorably positioned for continued growth in 2016 and beyond, based on our disciplined management of existing properties and expanded contributions from Plainridge Park, Tropicana Las Vegas and Prairie State Gaming, as well as our management contract at Hollywood Casino Jamul-San Diego, which is expected to open mid-year 2016.
At this year's Annual Meeting you will be asked: (i) to elect two experienced and distinguished Class II directors (Barbara Shattuck Kohn and Ronald J. Naples) to serve until the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified; (ii) to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the 2016 fiscal year; (iii) to hold an advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers; and (iv) to consider and transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting. The accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement describe these matters. We urge you to read this information carefully.
The Board of Directors unanimously believes that the election of its nominees for directors, the ratification of its selection of independent registered public accountants and the advisory vote to approve our executive compensation are advisable and will further the best interests of the Company and our stockholders. Accordingly, the Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of these proposals.
On behalf of the Board of Directors and the Company, I thank you for your participation. We look forward to seeing you on June 2 in Philadelphia.



Sincerely,



Timothy J. Wilmott
President and Chief Executive Officer
* See Reconciliations and Non-GAAP Financial Measures on page 43 of this of this Proxy Statement.

Table of Contents

GRAPHIC


2016 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary contains highlights about our Company and the upcoming 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider in advance of the meeting, and we encourage you to read the entire proxy statement before voting.

2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Date and Time:Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., local time

Location:


Offices of Ballard Spahr LLP, 1735 Market Street, 51st Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103

Record Date:


April 1, 2016

Voting Matters and Board Recommendations

ProposalMatter

Board Recommendation

1Election of Class II Directors (Barbara Shattuck Kohn and Ronald J. Naples)FOR each Nominee
2Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFOR
3Advisory Vote to Approve Executive CompensationFOR

2015 Performance Highlights

    Our share price appreciated by nearly 17% during the year, exceeding key benchmarks including the S&P 500 (–1%) and substantially outperforming our peer group of gaming companies (–21%).

    Revenue increased 9.6%, which helped to increase cash flow from operations by 52.1% (to $399.0 million) and adjusted EBITDA by 12.2% (to $796.3 million), while net income increased from a prior year loss to positive net income of approximately $0.7 million.*

    We improved already strong adjusted EBITDA margins from 27.4% to 28.1% and operating margins from 9.9% to 16.5%, all in a highly competitive environment.*

    In June, we opened Plainridge Park Casino. The property is generating a solid return on invested capital and was opened several years before any of the other future Massachusetts facilities.

    In August, we completed the financing and acquisition of the Tropicana Las Vegas, which fulfills our long-term strategic goal of obtaining a presence on the Las Vegas Strip to leverage our database of almost 3 million regional gaming customers.

    Also in August, we acquired Prairie State Gaming, one of the largest operators of video gaming terminals ("VGTs") in Illinois, with more than 1,100 terminals in 270 bar and retail gaming establishments. We expect this acquisitionAnuj Dhanda to serve as Class I directors. Each of the nominated persons currently serves as a platform for consolidating other VGT operators in Illinois and beyond.

    We began to implement our interactive strategy, which includes developing a new interactive division, launching our Hollywood Casino branded Play4Fun social gaming partnership with Scientific Games and establishing other partnerships that we expect to advance in 2016.

    We made significant progress in our development of a Hollywood Casino tribal gaming facility on the Jamul Indian Village's land in trust (near San Diego, California), which the Company will manage and brand upon its expected mid-2016 opening.


*
See Reconciliations and Non-GAAP Financial Measures on page 43 of this Proxy Statement.

Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

825 Berkshire Boulevard, Suite 200
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania 19610


PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
June 2, 2016


        Penn National Gaming, Inc. (the "Company" or "PENN") first made these materials available to shareholders on or about April 19, 2016 on the Internet, or, upon your request, has delivered printed proxy materials to you, in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Company's 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "Annual Meeting") to be held on June 2, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., local time, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, for the purposes set forth herein and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held at the offices of Ballard Spahr LLP, 1735 Market Street, 51st Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103. This solicitation is being made on behalfmember of the Board of Directors and has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to serve as a Class I director, if elected.

We believe that each of our Class I director nominees has the Company (the "Boardspecific experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills necessary to serve as an effective director on our Board of Directors" or the "Board").


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

        TheDirectors. A description of our process for identifying and evaluating director nominees, as well as our criteria for membership on our Board of Directors, hasis set forth under the close of business on April 1, 2016 as the record date (the "Record Date") for the determination of shareholders of the Company entitled to notice of,heading “Director Candidate Qualification and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, 81,218,649 shares of the Company's common stock were issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Selection Process.”

Vote Required

How many votes do I have?

        You have one vote for each share of common stock you owned as ofUnder our bylaws, the Record Date for the Annual Meeting.

Do shareholders have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors?

        No, shareholders do not have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors.


Table of Contents

What am I voting on and what votes are required?

        Assuming a quorum is present, the following votes will be required for approval:

ProposalMatterVote Required
Proposal 1Election of Class II DirectorsThe twothree nominees for Class I director receiving the highest number of votes cast will be elected
Proposal 2Ratification of selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the 2016 fiscal yearMajority of votes cast
Proposal 3Advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officersMajority of votes cast

        For purposes of determining the number of votes cast only those cast "for" or "against" are counted. Abstentions, "withhold" voteswill be elected. For purposes of the election of directors, withheld and broker non-votes arewill not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote, although they will be considered "cast" but are countedpresent for purposesthe purpose of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting.

Will any other matter be voted on?

        As of the date of this Proxy Statement, we know of no matter that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than those matters discussed in this Proxy Statement. If any other matters properly come before the meeting and call for a vote of the shareholders, the appointed proxies may use their discretion to vote on any such matters.

What constitutes a quorum?

        In order for business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting, a quorum must be present. The presence in person or by valid proxy, of shareholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes that all shareholders are entitled to cast is necessary for a quorum to be present at the Annual Meeting.

What is the difference between holding shares as a shareholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

        If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company's transfer agent, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust ("Continental"), you are considered a "registered shareholder" and are considered, with respect to those shares, the "shareholder of record." If you are a shareholder of record, the Notice or proxy materials were sent to you directly by the Company, and you may vote by any of the methods described below under "How do I vote?".

        If your shares are registered in the name of a stock brokerage account or by a broker, bank, or other nominee on your behalf (referred to as being held in "street name"), you are considered a "beneficial owner" of shares held in street name, and the broker, bank, or other nominee forwarded the Notice and, if you requested them, the proxy materials to you. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, or other nominee holding your shares how to vote and you are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not a shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you bring with you a legal proxy from the shareholder of record.

quorum.


Table of ContentsTABLE OF CONTENTS

How do I vote?

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 21
CLASS I DIRECTOR NOMINEES
Board
Recommendation

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A
VOTE “FOR” EACH CLASS I DIRECTOR NOMINEE:
(I) David Handler; (II) Vimla Black-Gupta; and (III) Anuj Dhanda

KEY SKILLS AND EXPERTISE:
• Financial (Capital Markets, Accounting & Tax): Acquired over his nearly 30-year career in investment banking with several leading global investment firms, where he successfully launched and expanded multiple technology sector groups. He most recently co-founded Tidal Partners, a strategic M&A advisory firm.
• Strategic Planning / M&A: Gained through decades of advising major technology companies on large- scale, high-profile and industry-defining transactions. Mr. Handler's long-term exposure to the gaming and technology industries, including opportunities created by emerging technologies, is an especially valuable asset to PENN, particularly as it relates to evaluating potential acquisitions in support of the Company's growth strategy.
• Technology / Digital: As a co-founder of an M&A advisory firm focused on the technology sector, Mr. Handler contributes to the Board deep strategic insights into the evolving and dynamic industry landscape, expertise in effective risk oversight and the ability to identify strategic opportunities for PENN's omnichannel growth strategy.

EXPERIENCE:
Tidal Partners – Co-Founder and Partner (2022-Present)
• Strategic M&A advisory firm focused on the technology industry
Centerview Partners – Partner, founding Head of the Technology Group (2008-2022)
• Investment banking and advisory firm
UBS – Managing Director, Co-Head of Americas Technology Investment Banking (2006-2009)
• Global investment bank
Bear Stearns & Company – Managing Director, Co-Head of Communications Technology Investment Banking (2000-2006)
• Specialized financial services company and investment bank
Jefferies – Managing Director, Head of New York Investment Banking (1995-2000)
• Investment banking and capital markets firm
David Handler
Class I Director (Independent)
Age: 59
Director Since: 1994
Board Chair Since: 2019
Education:
• NYU Stern School of Business:
BA, Marketing
• NYU Stern School of Business:
MBA, Finance



KEY SKILLS AND EXPERTISE:
• Industry Experience (Gaming, Hospitality, Media): Acquired over Ms. Black-Gupta's more than 25- year executive career in global marketing roles, including as Global Chief Marketing Officer at Equinox. In this role, she led the enterprise-wide marketing strategy for over 300 equinox sport clubs and a pipeline of 10 lifestyle Equinox hotels with a focus on customer experience and digital engagement that successfully elevated the lifestyle brand, enhanced client loyalty and expanded omnichannel growth opportunities.
• Sales & Marketing: Developed through her multiple roles focused on the development and execution of marketing strategies and digital media engagement tactics for global consumer brands. This included overseeing a digital marketing strategy for the $1B Bobbi Brown Cosmetics brand in over 150 countries, strategically positioning marketing for Procter and Gamble’s Gillette Venus and Oral B brands, and pioneering the beauty industry's first digital channel launch in support of Estée Lauder's Bobbi Brown brand, as well as her current role as Co-Founder of Ourself, where she is driving proprietary innovation in Bio-Technology for the fast growing direct-to-consumer and professional brand.
• Strategic Planning / M&A: Obtained throughout numerous executive leadership roles, where Ms. Black-Gupta was responsible for strategy development and M&A initiatives, including at Estée Lauder, where she worked closely with the corporate development team to support the company's M&A strategy to fuel brand innovation and growth, and in her current role as Co-Founder and previously CEO of Ourself, where she oversaw go-to-market product and commercial strategy.

EXPERIENCE:
Ourself – Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder (Co-Founder beginning 2021, CEO 2022-2024)
• An innovative skincare biotech skincare brand
Equinox Fitness Club and Hotel – Global Chief Marketing Officer (2017-2019)
• Luxury fitness company
Bobbi Brown Cosmetics – Senior Vice President of Global Marketing (2013-2017)
• Global premium beauty brand
Estée Lauder – Vice President Global Marketing Idea Bank (2008-2013)
• A multinational cosmetics company
Procter & Gamble – Global Marketing Director (2005-2007)
• Global consumer goods corporation
Various executive global marketing leadership roles for Gillette and Procter & Gamble – (1997-2005)
Vimla Black-Gupta
Class I Director (Independent)
Age: 54
Director Since: 2021
Committees:
• Compensation
• Nominating and Corporate Governance
Education:
• Duke University: BA
• Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management: MBA






TABLE OF CONTENTS

22 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
CLASS I DIRECTOR NOMINEES

SHAREHOLDERS
KEY SKILLS AND EXPERTISE:
• Technology / Digital: Obtained through numerous executive leadership roles with consumer- oriented and digitally-enabled businesses with responsibilities for technological transformation efforts, including customer digital engagement and intelligence, application, and supply chain modernization. At Albertsons Companies (NYSE: ACI), he led the shift to exclusively cloud-based operations and is currently focused on accelerating business growth through the use of AI. In recognition of his contributions to advancing the use of technology in business, Mr. Dhanda was inducted into the CIO Hall of Fame.
• Cybersecurity: Acquired through more than 15 years of service as Chief Information Officer with leading national retail and financial services companies, overseeing the security of IT architecture, application platforms and data, including in Mr. Dhanda’s current role with Albertsons Companies where he oversees the security and reliability of the payments platform that processes approximately $78 billion in sales.
• Strategic Planning / M&A: Gained by serving in strategic planning roles at JP Morgan (NYSE: JPM) and executive roles with PNC Financial Services Group (NYSE: PNC), which focused on leading business development in high potential markets and enterprise-wide transformation strategies. He played critical roles in leading business and technology functions across multiple mergers and acquisitions by PNC. At Albertsons Companies, Mr. Dhanda oversaw the post-acquisition integration of the company and Safeway to a common platform and is currently leading the Integration planning for Albertsons for their planned merger with Kroger.

EXPERIENCE:
Albertsons Companies, Inc. (NYSE: ACI) – EVP and Chief Technology and Transformation Officer (Since 2023), EVP and Chief Information Officer (2015-2022)
• Leading Fortune 100 grocery store chain
Giant Eagle, Inc. – SVP, Digital Commerce and Chief Information Officer (2013-2015)
• American supermarket chain
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (NYSE: PNC) – EVP and CIO (2008-2013), SVP and CIO, PNC Bank (2005-2008), SVP and Manager, Eastern Markets (1997-1999), Small Business Lending (1995-1997)
• Diversified U.S.-based financial services institution
JP Morgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) (Formerly JP Morgan & Co.) – SVP, Marketing and Business Planning Manager, Consumer Bank (1992-1995), Strategic Planning Officer, Regional Banking Operations Division (1989-1992), Management Consultant, Retail Operations and Technology (1988-1989)
• Leading global financial services firm
Citigroup, Inc. (NYSE: C) – Management Consultant (1986-1987)
• Diversified financial services holding company
Anuj Dhanda
Class I Director (Independent)
Age: 61
Director Since: 2024
Committees:
• Compliance
Education:
• University of Delhi: BA, Commerce
• Rutgers University: MBA
• Rutgers University: PhD, Finance
Public Board Directorships:
• BlueLinx Holdings (NYSE: BXC)
(2023-Present)







Board
Recommendation

OUR BOARD OF RECORD
(shares registeredDIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH CLASS I DIRECTOR NOMINEE:
(I) David Handler; (II) Vimla Black-Gupta; and (III) Anuj Dhanda

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 23
CONTINUING DIRECTORS  

KEY SKILLS AND EXPERTISE:
• Industry Experience (Gaming, Hospitality, Media) and Government Affairs: Gained over Ms. Kaplowitz's more than 35-year career in the media industry, including her current role as Chief Executive Officer of 4A's, a trade association for advertising agencies that serves corporate members representing more than 85% of total U.S. advertising spend. In her current role, Ms. Kaplowitz works closely with members of the U.S. Congress to address critical issues pertaining to the media and digital media industry and the industry's evolving regulatory landscape.
• Sales & Marketing: Acquired through her extensive career in marketing and communications, including executive leadership roles focused on identifying strategic growth areas to build consumer loyalty and strengthen brand equity. During Ms. Kaplowitz's nearly 25 years at media communication agencies, she led marketing campaigns for global high-profile brands across personal care, restaurant and financial services sectors. Ms. Kaplowitz has successfully guided clients through impacts of evolving technologies on consumer behavior, including risks and opportunities associated with digital consumer experiences, omnichannel growth strategies and data privacy risks.
• Sustainability: Obtained through her leadership roles in advertising, marketing and media that required understanding of the evolving impact of climate risks on various industries and evolving consumer preferences. Ms. Kaplowitz's work has included advising global companies on the booksFTC's updated Green Guides on the use of
environmental marketing claims, as well as the Company via Continental)



VOTING METHOD

BENEFICIAL OWNERS
(shares held through your bank
or brokerage account)



shifting regulatory and legislative landscape across state jurisdictions.

EXPERIENCE:
American Association of Advertising Agencies (4A's) – President and CEO (2017-Present)
• Trade association serving more than 600 member agencies throughout the U.S.
MEC Global (now Wavemaker Global) – CEO of North America (2011-2017)
• Global media agency.
Mediavest (now Spark Foundry) – EVP, Managing Director (2006-2011), SVP, Group Media Director (1999-2002)
• A full-service media agency that provides marketing, content and technology solutions.
Ammirati Puris Lintas – SVP, Group Media Director (1996-1999)
• Advertising Agency
Marla Kaplowitz
Class III Director (Independent)
Age: 58
Director Since: 2020
Committees:
• Nominating and Corporate Governance, Chair
• Compensation
Education:
• UC Santa Barbara: BA, Sociology






www.proxyvote.com
(you will need

KEY SKILLS AND EXPERTISE:
• Risk Management: Acquired during Ms. Scaccetti’s almost 45-year career as a practicing CPA, including at Drucker & Scaccetti, which she co-founded, and at Laventhol & Horwath, where she was the Control Numberfirst woman to be named tax partner. In these roles, she provided counsel to U.S. and international companies on a wide range of complex tax planning, corporate transactions and business strategy matters.
• Cybersecurity: Developed through her leadership role at Drucker & Scaccetti, where she oversaw the creation and continued evolution of information security systems and controls to safeguard the firm’s information infrastructure. Ms. Scaccetti’s expertise was further enhanced through her role as the chair of the audit committee at multiple public companies for over three decades and her service on the board of a $3B+ in revenue non-profit institution where cybersecurity is paramount to protecting personal health records and information; annual CPA continuing education requirements; and cybersecurity oversight and cybersecurity training from the Notice or proxy card you received)
Internetwww.proxyvote.com
(you will need the Control Number from the Notice or voter instruction form you received)
National Association of Corporate Directors.
• HR / Talent Management / DE&I: Gained through her experience working with corporate clients on succession planning, compensation and organizational development of key staff, as well as her extensive experience managing people and developing talent as a partner, principal and CEO for accounting and business advisory firms.

EXPERIENCE:
Armanino LLP – Of Counsel (2022-Present)
• The successor company of Drucker & Scaccetti, P.C.
Drucker & Scaccetti, P.C. – Chief Executive Officer (2013-2021), Partner (1990-2021)
• A public accounting and business advisory firm
Laventhol & Horwath – Partner (1987-1990), Staff/Manager (1977-1987)
• An international accounting firm
Jane Scaccetti1-800-690-6903
(you will need the Control Number from the Notice or proxy card you received)
Telephone1-800-690-6903
(you will need the Control Number from the Notice or proxy card you received)
Class III Director (Independent)
Age: 70
Director Since: 2015
Committees:
• Audit, Chair
• Compliance
Education:
• Temple University's Fox School of Business: BBA
• Villanova Law School: MA, Taxation
Public Board Directorships:
• Myers Industries, Inc (2016-2021)
• The Pep Boys (2002-2016)


TABLE OF CONTENTS

24 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024Sign, date
CONTINUING DIRECTORS  

KEY SKILLS AND EXPERTISE:
• Industry Experience (Gaming, Hospitality, Media): Gained from Mr. Snowden’s more than 25- year successful career in the highly regulated and return
your proxy card
MailSign, daterapidly evolving gaming and return your voter instruction formsports betting industry, and hospitality and entertainment sectors. Prior to being appointed as CEO in 2020, he served as PENN’s President and Chief Operating Officer and as SVP of Regional Operations. Mr. Snowden previously spent 12 years with Caesars Entertainment, where he acquired significant gaming industry management experience across several regional and destination markets, including as Senior Vice President and General Manager of both Caesar’s and Harrah’s Resorts in Atlantic City.
• HR / Talent Management / DE&I: Acquired through his executive leadership career overseeing talent strategies at large corporations, including talent integration initiatives following strategic transactions. At PENN, Mr. Snowden oversaw the launch of the expansive DE&I strategy and evolution of talent initiatives to support the growth of the Interactive segment.
• Technology / Digital: Since being named CEO, Mr. Snowden has led PENN’s expansion into sports media, entertainment and technology, including the Company’s acquisition of theScore and transformative strategic alliance with ESPN. His deep industry knowledge and digital transformation expertise provide unique perspectives on the Company’s strategic navigation of its broader omnichannel expansion.

EXPERIENCE:
PENN Entertainment
• CEO and President (2020-Present)
• President and Chief Operating Officer (2017-2019)
• Chief Operating Officer (2014-2017)
• Senior Vice President of Regional Operations (2011-2014)
Caesars and Harrah's Resorts Atlantic City – Senior Vice President and General Manager (2010-2011)
• Casino resort and hotel
Caesars Entertainment Corporation – Various leadership positions in St. Louis, San Diego and Las Vegas (1998-2010)
• Leading global gaming and hospitality resort chain
Jay Snowden
Class III Director (Executive Director)
Age: 48
Education:
• Harvard University: BA
• Washington University in
St. Louis: MBA









Complete

KEY SKILLS AND EXPERTISE:
• Financial (Capital Markets, Accounting & Tax): Acquired over Ms. Shattuck Kohn’s 35-year career in investment banking, capital markets and project finance, where she advised companies on M&A and capital allocation strategies. Additionally, as president of an investment banking firm she co-founded, Shattuck Hammond Partners, Ms. Shattuck Kohn was responsible for overseeing the company’s financial reporting and compliance processes. Ms. Shattuck Kohn contributes this extensive financial expertise to the Board to evaluate potential acquisitions and financing opportunities.
• Regulatory / Public Policy: During her extensive investment banking career, Ms. Shattuck Kohn specialized in navigating the highly regulated healthcare industry at both the state and federal government levels, obtaining regulatory approvals for multiple transactions across various jurisdictions.
• Corporate Governance: Ms. Shattuck Kohn brings over 20 years of public company director experience, and currently serves as a written ballot atdirector on the Annual Meetingboards of Fluent (NASDAQ: FLNT), an advertising and marketing services company, and Emblem Health, one of the nation’s largest nonprofit health plans. She previously served as a director of Computer Task Group (NYSE: CTG), a division of Sunlife Financial Corporation.

EXPERIENCE:
Hammond Hanlon Camp LLC – Principal (2012-2018)
• Strategic advisory and investment banking firm
Shattuck Hammond Partners – Principal, Founder and President (1993-2012, when acquired by Morgan Keegan – Raymond James)
• An investment banking firm
Cain Brothers, Shattuck & Company – Principal and Co-Founder (1983-1993)
• A healthcare financial advisory firm
Goldman Sachs & Co. – Vice President and Manager of Healthcare Investment Banking Group
(1976-1983)
• Multinational investment bank and financial services company
Barbara Shattuck Kohn
Class II Director (Independent)
Age: 73
Director Since: 2004
Committees:
• Compensation, Chair
• Audit
Education:
• Connecticut College: BA,
Environmental Studies
Public Board Directorships:
• Fluent, Inc. (2019-Present)


  
In PersonObtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank, or other nominee and complete a written ballot at the Annual Meeting

        When your proxy is properly submitted, your shares will be voted as you indicate. If you do not indicate your voting preferences, the appointed proxies will vote your shares FOR the nominees in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. If your shares are owned in joint names, all joint owners must vote by the same method, and if joint owners vote by mail, all of the joint owners must sign the proxy card. The deadline for voting by telephone or via the Internet is 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on June 1, 2016.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 25
CONTINUING DIRECTORS  

KEY SKILLS AND EXPERTISE:
• Cybersecurity: Developed through his over 40 years of service in executive leadership and independent director roles at public companies, which included both oversight and execution of information security and customer data privacy programs.
• Government Affairs: Acquired through holding a number of government leadership positions, including Chair of the Pennsylvania Stimulus Oversight Commission, Chief Accountability Officer for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Chair of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and various roles in the White House. Additionally, as CEO of a public specialty chemical company, Mr. Naples led regulatory compliance efforts and was responsible for maintaining strong relationships with government agencies.
• Sustainability: Obtained extensive expertise while serving in the White House as Special Assistant
to the Head of the Federal Energy Administration and while serving as Executive Director of a Presidential Task Force on energy problems. As a CEO of several public companies and during his most recent service on the board of Glatfelter Corp., a sustainably engineered products company, Mr. Naples developed expertise in establishment, execution and oversight of sustainability practices and processes to strengthen customer access and market position, and preparedness for evolving sustainability requirements.


EXPERIENCE:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania – Chief Accountability Officer (2009-2011)
Quaker Chemical Corporation (NYSE: KWR) – Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (1995-2008)
• Public specialty chemical company serving the metalworking and manufacturing industries worldwide
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia – Board Chair (2001-2005)
Hunt Manufacturing Company – Chief Executive Officer and Board Chair (1981-1995)
• Consumer and commercial product business with retail distribution
Presidential Task Force on Energy – Executive Director (1975-1976)
White House – White House Fellow (1974-1975), serving as:
• Assistant to the Counselor to the President for Economic Affairs
• Special Assistant to the Head of the Federal Energy Administration
U.S. Army – Captain (1967-1971)
Ronald Naples
Class II Director (Independent)
Age: 78
Director Since: 2013
Committees:
• Compliance
• Nominating and Corporate Governance
Education:
• U.S. Military Academy at
West Point: BS
• Fletcher School at Tufts
University: MA
• Harvard Business School: MBA
Public Board Directorships:
• Glatfelter Corp. (2000-2021)
• Quaker Chemical Corp. (1997-2009)
• Hunt Manufacturing Company (1981-1995)



KEY SKILLS AND EXPERTISE:
• Financial (Capital Markets, Accounting and Tax): Acquired through more than 40 years of service in the public accounting industry as a licensed CPA advising public and private companies, including in the gaming industry. Mr. Reibstein developed significant familiarity with PENN’s growth drivers and capital allocation strategies from serving as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer between 2013 and 2016. In that role, he oversaw PENN’s capital restructuring, obtained financing for new property development and gained insights into every aspect of the Company’s operations.
• Regulatory / Public Policy: Gained through his first-hand experience working with state gaming regulators while serving as CFO of PENN. This included working with regulators throughout the licensing application process and overseeing the Company’s compliance program across multiple jurisdictions.
• Corporate Governance: Developed through Mr. Reibstein’s service as Independent Board Chair at Vishay Precision Group (NYSE: VPG). His previous roles on Vishay’s Board included Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of both its Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees, which provided him with extensive experience across all key governance aspects of a public company.

EXPERIENCE:
PENN Entertainment – Executive Advisor (2017), Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (2013-2016), Treasurer (2014-2016)
CBIZ, Inc. (NYSE: CBZ) – Member of the senior management team holding a number of positions, including, most recently: Executive Managing Director and Head of New York Office (2004-2013)
• Professional services company specializing in accounting, tax, insurance and human resources advisory
BDO Seidman – Regional Managing Partner (1998-2003), Partner (1993-2003)
• National accounting services firm
Saul Reibstein
Class II Director (Independent)
Age: 76
Director Since: 2018 (and previously a director from 2011-2014)
Committees:
• Audit
• Compensation
Education:
• Fox School of Business at Temple University: BBA, Accounting and Finance
Public Board Directorships:
• Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (2010-Present)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

26 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Corporate Governance Highlights

What is the effect of giving a proxy?

        Proxies are solicited byOur commitment to corporate governance is integral to our business and on behalfreflects not only regulatory requirements, the Listing Rules of our Board of Directors,the Nasdaq Stock Market (the “Nasdaq Rules”) and the persons named in the proxy have been designated as proxiesbroadly recognized governance practices, but also effective leadership and oversight by our Board of Directors. When proxies are properly dated, executed and returned, the shares represented by such proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the shareholder. If no specific instructions are given, however, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our Board of Directors as described above. If any matters not described in this Proxy Statement are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote the shares. If the Annual Meeting is adjourned, the proxy holders can vote the shares on the new Annual Meeting date as well, unless you have properly revoked your proxy instructions, as described above.

What are broker non-votes?

        A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank, or other nominee holding shares on behalf of a beneficial owner is prohibited from exercising discretionary voting authority for a beneficial owner who has not provided voting instructions. Brokers, banks, and other nominees may vote without instruction only on "routine" proposals. On "non-routine" proposals, nominees cannot vote without instructions from the beneficial owner, resulting in so-called "broker non-votes." Proposal 2, the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, is the only routine proposal on the ballot for the Annual Meeting. All other proposals are non-routine. If you hold your shares with a broker, bank, or other nominee, they will not be voted on non-routine proposals unless you give voting instructions to such nominee.


Table of Contents

May I change my vote?

        You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the voting deadline for the Annual Meeting. After your initial vote, you may vote again on a later date any time prior to the Annual Meeting via the Internet or by telephone (only your latest Internet or telephone proxy submitted prior to the voting deadline for the Annual Meeting will be counted), by signing and returning a new proxy card or voting instruction form with a later date, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person (a legal proxy is required if you hold your shares in street name and you plan to vote in person at the Annual Meeting). However, your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you vote again at the Annual Meeting or specifically request in writing that your prior proxy be revoked. If your shares are held in street name by a broker, bank, or other nominee, you must contact that nominee to change your vote.

May I attend the meeting?

        All shareholders, properly appointed proxy holders, and invited guests of the Company may attend the Annual Meeting. Shareholders who plan to attend the meeting may be required to present valid photo identification. If you hold your shares in street name, please also bring proof of your share ownership, such as a broker's statement showing that you beneficially owned shares of the Company on the Record Date, or a legal proxy from your broker, bank, or other nominee (a legal proxy is required if you hold your shares in street name and you plan to vote in person at the Annual Meeting). Shareholders of record will be verified against an official list that will be available at the meeting. The Company reserves the right to deny admittance to anyone who cannot adequately show proof of share ownership as of the Record Date.

Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of printed proxy materials?

        In accordance with rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), we may furnish proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement and our 2015 Annual Report, to our shareholders by providing access to such documents on the Internet instead of mailing printed copies. Most shareholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy materials unless they request them. Instead, the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2016 Annual Meeting (the "Notice"), which was mailed to most of our shareholders, will instruct you as to how you may access and review all of the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice also instructs you as to how you may submit your proxy on the Internet. If you would like to receive a paper or email copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice. In addition, you may request to receive all future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email by following the instructions contained in the Notice. We encourage shareholders to take advantage of the availability of our proxy materials on the Internet to help reduce the environmental impact of our annual meetings of shareholders.

Who will bear the costs of this solicitation and how will proxies be solicited?

        The Company has engaged the services of Innisfree M&A Incorporated, a third party proxy solicitation firm, to assist in its proxy solicitation efforts. The Company estimates that the fees to be paid to Innisfree M&A Incorporated for this service will be approximately $15,000, plus reimbursement for out- of-pocket expenses. The Company will bear the cost of this solicitation. In addition, the Company may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding solicitation material to such beneficial owners. Proxies also may be solicited by certain directors, officers and employees of the Company, without additional compensation, personally or by telephone, telegram, telecopy or via the Internet.


Table of Contents

What is the Company's Internet address?

        The Company's Internet address iswww.pngaming.com. The Company's filings with the SEC are available free of charge via the "Investors" link at this website (click on the "SEC Filings" link), and may also be found at the SEC's website,www.sec.gov.

Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

        We will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting. We will also disclose voting results on a Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available to us in time to file a Current Report on Form 8-K, we will file a Current Report on Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and will provide the final results in an amendment to the Current Report on Form 8-K as soon as they become available.


Table of Contents


GOVERNANCE OF THE COMPANY

Corporate Governance Highlights

    Six of our eight Board members are independent.

    The Board's committees are comprised exclusively of independent directors.

    The roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are separate.

    None of our Board members serve on more than one other public company board.

    Our Board includes an appropriate mix of gender, tenure and experience, including two female directors and three directors having tenure of less than three years.

    We have significant stock ownership requirements for our directors and named executive officers, which were recently increased for all named executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer.

    We give our shareholders an opportunity to express their views on executive compensation by holding an annual advisory vote.

    In response to conversations with our shareholders, we amended our bylaws on December 10, 2014 in order to eliminate a "golden leash" provision that generally prohibited an individual from serving as a director of the Company if he or she is a party to any compensatory arrangement with a third party in connection with such service.

    We conduct a comprehensive succession planning and talent development process.

    We have a Company-wide enterprise risk management program to assess, manage, report and monitor areas that may affect our ability to achieve our objectives.

    We have a cyber security committee comprised of senior employees at the Company, which provides frequent reports to our Board and Audit Committee on cyber security matters.

    In light of the highly regulated industry in which the Company operates, we have established a Compliance Committee comprised of Board members and non-director compliance professionals in order to help ensure that the Company adheres to highest legal, regulatory, professional and ethical standards.

    The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct to deter wrongdoing, address potential conflicts of interest and related party transactions, and promote ethical conduct and compliance with applicable laws, and the Compliance Committee and Audit Committee of the Board receives periodic updates on matters relating to this Code.

    The Board has also adopted and carefully adheres to Corporate Governance Guidelines that include policies and procedures relating to the role, structure and composition of the Board, risk oversight and conflicts of interest.

    Our active shareholder engagement efforts include regular robust communication and discussion with shareholders, including direct dialogue with many of our shareholders regarding the Company's performance, as well as executive compensation and corporate governance issues.

    The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly reviews and assesses the Company's corporate governance structure and practices in light of industry trends and best practices.

Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Overview

        The Company is a growth-oriented, publicly traded, multi-jurisdictional gaming and racing company that has consistently generated attractive returns for its shareholders through a focus on optimizing current operations while pursuing growth through transactions and prudent capital investment, including the spin-off of its real estate assets to a separate publicly traded company, the development of new facilities, the expansion of existing facilities and the strategic acquisition of existing gaming and racing properties. In addition, as described below, in 2015 the Company entered into three new business lines (owning and operating a property on the Las Vegas Strip, acquiring a VGT operator in the state of Illinois and initiating the development of a new interactive division). The Company deploys disciplined operating strategies by managing existing properties with a focus on maximizing profitability and free cash flow, while at the same time endeavoring to deliver outstanding gaming and entertainment experiences for customers and supporting the local communities in which we operate. The Company operates in a highly specialized and rigorously regulated industry, which demands a high level of integrity and an extraordinary level of transparency and accountability in all key aspects of its operations, itssenior management team and its Board of Directors.

        Over time, the Company has demonstrated a commitment to pursuing innovative transactions to create additional value for shareholders. For instance, in 2007 the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Company to several private equity firms which, if consummated, would have resulted in a significant premium to shareholders. Although the transaction was ultimately terminated due to the 2008 credit crisis, the Company obtained a settlement resulting in over $1.4 billion of capital that was deployed for future growth initiatives. More recently, on November 1, 2013, the Company completed a three year project of separating its gaming operating assets from its real property assets by forming a separate entity that became a publicly traded real estate investment trust, known as Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. ("GLPI"), through a tax free spin-off (the "Spin-Off"). In connection with the Spin-Off, each shareholder of the Company received one share of common stock of GLPI for each share of common stock of the Company held by such shareholder. In its analysis and ultimate approval of the Spin-Off, the Board determined that this complex and novel transaction was likely to bring meaningful benefits to the Company's stakeholders by unlocking the value of the Company's real estate assets. From the announcement of the Spin-Off on November 15, 2012 until its completion on November 1, 2013, the Company's share price increased by 56.8%, and the Company's share price increased by 20.2% from the Spin-Off through December 31, 2015.

        Since the Spin-Off, the Company has continued to strengthen its standing as a premier regional gaming operator through its operational performance and active pursuit of development projects and business lines that take years to come to fruition. Most notably, in August 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of the Tropicana Las Vegas. This fulfills its long-term strategic objective to acquire a quality Las Vegas Strip property with excellent growth prospects to enable the Company to leverage its database of nearly three million active regional gaming customers, a significant percentage of which regularly visit Las Vegas. During 2015, the Company opened Plainridge Park Casino in Plainville, Massachusetts after years of competitive processes and a myriad of regulatory and legal challenges. This facility is currently the only gaming facility in Massachusetts and opened years ahead of the expected MGM and Wynn facilities in the Commonwealth. In addition, throughout 2015, the Company continued to develop the Hollywood Casino facility on the Jamul Indian Village's land in trust (near San Diego, California), which the Company is currently financing and will manage and brand upon its expected mid-2016 opening. This project is particularly notable in light of the failure of previous developers to reach the construction stage, the difficulty in constructing the facility on a relatively small parcel and the impact of certain community opposition to the project.

        The Company has also aggressively pursued new channels for growth. For instance, in August 2015, the Company acquired Prairie State Gaming ("PSG"), a leading Illinois video gaming terminal


Table of Contents

("VGT") operator. As one of the largest and most respected VGT operators in Illinois, PSG's operations include more than 1,100 gaming terminals across a network of 270 bar and retail gaming establishments. We expect this acquisition to serve as a platform for consolidating other VGT operators in Illinois and other jurisdictions where this form of gaming is being considered. The Company also began to implement its long-term interactive strategy, which includes building out a new interactive team, launching our Hollywood Casino branded Play4Fun social gaming partnership with Scientific Games, and establishing other partnerships that we expect to advance in 2016. The Company believes these initiatives will enhance loyalty and retention of its customers, drive new and additional casino visitation and build engagement with its brands both on- and off-premises.

        The Board believes that its structure and composition have been important elements of the Company's development activity, growth and success in regional gaming markets over the years. The Board is comprised of individuals each of whom bring unique talents and perspectives to their service on the Board and, as a group, strike a balance between those who have a proven track record of effectively working together to responsibly oversee management's operation of the Company and those who bring new perspective and insight to the Board. In fact, over the last three years, the Company has added three talented new directors and looks forward to the long-term benefits of their diversity of experience and views. In addition, no member of the Board serves on the boards of more than two public companies, which helps to ensure that each member is fully engaged in their duties to the Company.

        In furtherance of the Company's objective toteam. To maximize shareholder value, the Board strives to maintain a governance environment wherewhere: (i) entrepreneurship and appropriateprudent risk taking are encouraged, with a focus on both long- and short-term value creation,creation; (ii) shareholder perspectives are understood and long-term relationships with shareholders are fostered through frequent, candid and comprehensive engagement with and disclosure to the Company'sCompany’s shareholders and the investment community,community; (iii) integrity and accountability are integrated into the Company'sCompany’s management philosophy and operationsoperations; and (iv) the Company is able to continuously attract, develop and retain the best possibleindustry-leading executive talent to manage the Company'sCompany’s increasingly complex operations.

The Board continuouslyregularly evaluates the governance environment to enable the Company to respond appropriately to changes, practices and market conditions, as well as suggestions from our shareholders and other stakeholders, in a manner that we believe will protect and promotestakeholders. Notable features of our corporate governance framework include the Company's long-term record of growing shareholder value. For example, following discussion between the Company and certain of its key shareholders, the Board amended its bylaws on December 10, 2014 in order to eliminate a provision (sometimes referred to as a "golden leash") that generally prohibited an individual from qualifying for service as a director of the Company if he or she is a party to any compensatory or other financial arrangement with any third party in connection with his or her candidacy or service as a director of the Company.

Composition and Independence

        The Company's Board of Directors currently consists of eight members: Peter M. Carlino, Harold Cramer, David A. Handler, John M. Jacquemin, Ronald J. Naples, Barbara Shattuck Kohn, Jane Scaccetti (who joined in 2015) and Timothy J. Wilmott. The Board believes it is appropriately sized to carry out its responsibilities. With eight directors, the Board is small enough to stimulate individual engagement and involvement and to allow directors to communicate frequently with management and each other. In addition, the Board's size remains small enough to permit meetings to be conducted on short notice, to better facilitate the Company's prompt consideration of potential opportunities and material challenges as they arise. This is especially critical to support the Company's efforts to strategically acquire or develop new assets and to unlock shareholder value through innovative transactions, all of which may involve complex and unforeseen issues that arise on short notice and require collaboration and prompt decision making, as well as the benefit of long-term industry experience. At the same time, the Board believes that it is large enough to encourage diverse viewpoints and better collaborative decision making. The collective membership of the Board has a

following:

WHAT WE DOWHAT WE DON'T DO

89% Independent Directors. Eight of our nine directors have been determined by us to be “independent” as defined by the Nasdaq Rules.

No Poison Pill or Shareholder Rights Plan. We do not have a “poison pill” or shareholder rights plan.

Independent Chair. Our Board Chair is an independent director.

No Significant Related Party Transactions. We do not currently have any significant related party transactions. In addition, no immediate family relationships exist between any of our directors or executive officers and any of our other directors or executive officers.

Ongoing Board Refreshment. Three new independent directors appointed in the last four years demonstrates our commitment to ensuring that our Board meets our evolving oversight needs.

No Option Trading or Short Selling of Our Securities. Our insider trading policy prohibits our directors and officers from trading in options, warrants, puts and calls or similar instruments on Company securities or sell Company securities “short”.

Regular Board and Committee Self-Evaluations. The Board of Directors and each Committee conduct a comprehensive annual self-evaluation process.

No Hedging of Our Securities. Our insider trading policy prohibits our directors and officers from engaging in any hedging or monetization transactions involving our securities.

Systemic Risk Oversight by Board and Committees. Our Board has overall responsibility for risk oversight, while each of our Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Compliance Committees monitor and address risks within the scope of their expertise and charter.

No Pledging of Our Securities. Our insider trading policy prohibits our directors and officers from purchasing our securities on margin or pledging our securities as collateral for margin or other loans.

Entirely Independent Committees. All the members of our Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are independent.

No Single-Trigger Change in Control Severance Rights. Acceleration of equity vesting is provided only upon a combination of a change in control and a qualified termination.

Audit Committee Financial Experts. Each member of our Audit Committee qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC.

No Gross-Up Payments to Cover Excise Taxes. We do not provide tax gross-ups to our officers in connection with a change in control severance or other compensation, benefits or executive perquisites.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors. Our stock ownership guidelines require that each of our directors accumulate a holding of shares having a value of 5x the value of the annual retainer amount

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Executives. Our stock ownership guidelines require our CEO to accumulate a holding of shares equal to 6x his annual base salary, and our other executives to accumulate a holding of shares equal to 3x their respective annual base salaries.

Shareholder Outreach. The Company has a long-standing practice of frequent communication and discussion with shareholders, and formally expanded this program to include annual off-cycle outreach in 2022.

Clawback Policy. We maintain discretion to clawback incentive awards in the event of misconduct and maintain a robust mandatory clawback policy covering excess incentive based compensation in the event of a restatement.

Table of ContentsTABLE OF CONTENTS

strong background in capital markets, accounting, tax, legal and governmental affairs, as well as long-term experience with the Company's operations in a highly regulated industry. This experience proves especially valuable in light of the complexities inherent in our industry and development pipeline and the fact that we operate across a broad range of jurisdictions throughout the United States. Consequently, the Board believes that its composition is optimized to support and oversee the Company's business and strategy.

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 27
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Corporate Governance Documents
CORPORATE GOVENANCE
GUIDELINES
The Board has adopted and regularly reviews Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Corporate Governance Guidelines”) that are intended to provide a structure which permits our Board and management to effectively pursue the Company’s objectives for the benefit of its shareholders and other constituencies. The Corporate Governance Guidelines include policies and procedures relating to, among other items, the role, structure and composition of the Board; Board procedures and leadership; risk oversight; use of outside consultants; and conflicts of interest. The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly consider the efficacy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the policies referenced therein.
CODE OF BUSINESS
CONDUCT
The Board has adopted and regularly reviews the Company’s Code of Business Conduct (the “Code of Conduct”), which applies to all directors and employees of the Company, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. The Code of Conduct is designed to, among other things, promote ethical behavior, deter wrongdoing, address potential conflicts of interest, and encourage both compliance with applicable laws and full and accurate reporting in the Company’s filings with the SEC. The Code of Conduct also provides for a 24-hour hotline that any employee, patron, vendor or other third party can use to report, anonymously if they so choose, any suspected fraud, financial impropriety or other alleged wrongdoing. These reports are promptly investigated and receive the highest level of management attention, with particular focus from the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer; Vice President, Internal Audit; Chief Human Resources Officer and Legal Department, as appropriate. Subsequently, senior management provides investigation summaries to the Compliance Committee and the Audit Committee.
WHERE TO FIND OUR
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
DOCUMENTS
www.pennentertainment.com/investors/corporate-governance
Please visit our website to view or obtain copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, committee charters and Code of Business Conduct. The information found on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this Proxy Statement or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC. You may also obtain, free of charge, a copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, committee charters and Code of Business Conduct by directing your request in writing to Secretary, PENN Entertainment, Inc., 825 Berkshire Boulevard, Wyomissing, PA 19610. Additional information relating to the corporate governance of our Company is also set forth below and included in other sections of this Proxy Statement.
Director Independence
The Board has determined that all of the directors, other than Mr. Carlino and Mr. Wilmott,Snowden, are independent under the current Listing RulesNasdaq Rules. Notably, the Board’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are comprised exclusively of independent directors. The independent Board directors typically meet several times per year in executive session.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

28 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Board and Committee Evaluation Process
Board and Committee evaluations play a critical role in ensuring the NASDAQ Stock Market (the "NASDAQ Rules"). Mr. Carlino does not currently meet these independence requirements, in part, dueeffective functioning of our Board of Directors. It is important to his previous role as Chief Executive Officerevaluate Board, Committee and director performance and to solicit and act upon feedback received from each member of the Company, a position he relinquished in 2013 in connection with the Spin-Off.

Board Leadership

        Since the time of the Company's initial public offering in 1994 until the Spin-Off in 2013, Mr. Carlino served as both the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of theour Board. In connection with the Spin-Off, Mr. Wilmott became Chief Executive Officer of the Company (and subsequently joined the Board in September 2014), while Mr. Carlino has retained his role as the Company's Chairman ofTo this end, the Board and became Chairman ofeach Committee conduct a comprehensive annual self-evaluation process that is overseen by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The process for reviewing and taking action based on the Board and Chief Executive OfficerCommittee annual evaluations is set out below.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 29
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Director Candidate Qualification and Selection Process
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers candidates for Board membership suggested by, among others, its members, other Board members and management. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will also consider recommendations of GLPI. David A. Handler also joined the board ofnominees for directors of GLPI in connection with the Spin-Off, while retaining his position on the Board. The Board believes there are appropriate policies and procedures in place to address any actual or perceived conflicts of interestby shareholders (for information relating to the two "overlapping"nominations of directors by our shareholders, please see “Director Nominations by Shareholders” on page 92).


TABLE OF CONTENTS

30 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Director Candidate Qualification and that these procedures have worked wellSelection Process (cont.)
During the candidate review process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and its delegates conduct interviews with the potential nominee. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will also submit the candidate to an investigation overseen by the Chief Compliance Officer to evaluate whether the candidate is suitable to serve on the Board of a highly regulated, multi- jurisdictional company subject to gaming regulatory oversight. A successful candidate will also be required to submit to applicable gaming regulatory suitability investigations, which include providing detailed financial and personal history information customarily requested by the Company’s gaming regulators.
Our Board and Committee evaluation process has resulted in regular Board refreshment, with three new independent directors added in the twolast four years, contributing extensive marketing, strategy, technology, media, cybersecurity, and digital transformation experience to our Board, ensuring effective oversight of our growth strategy.



Marla Kaplowitz
Appointed Nov. 2020
Vimla Black-Gupta
Appointed Jun. 2021
Anuj Dhanda
Appointed Mar. 2024


John Jacquemin
Not standing for re-election
at our 2024 Annual Meeting

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 31
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Board Leadership
David Handler, who is an independent director, has served as our Board Chair since June 12, 2019. Mr. Handler joined our Board in 1994 and is a half years sincepartner at Tidal Partners, an independent financial advisory firm that provides M&A and strategic advisory services focused on the Spin-Off.

technology industry. The Board believes that Mr. CarlinoHandler is best suited to serve as Chairman of theour Board Chair because of his proven track record of generating shareholder value forconsiderable investment banking and capital markets experience, including a focus on mergers and acquisitions and other significant transactions (including many in the Company. This impressive recordtechnology space), which complements his long-term exposure to the gaming industry. Mr. Handler’s background has been based on his vision foran invaluable asset to the Company and his talent for successfully identifying and capitalizing on opportunitiesover the years, particularly in the gaming and racing industry, as well as his significant role in recruiting and developing talented executives to manage the Company. Moreover, the Board believes that Mr. Carlino's substantial beneficial ownership of the Company's equity strongly aligns his interestsconnection with the interests of all shareholders.

        As part of the planning for the Spin-Off,Company’s digital transformation and in evaluating potential acquisitions and financing opportunities.

The Company’s governing documents allow the roles of Board Chair and CEO to be filled by the Chairmansame or different individuals. This approach allows the Board flexibility to determine whether the two roles should be separated or combined based on our needs and the Board’s assessment of the Company’s leadership from time to time. The Board will periodically consider the advantages of having an independent Board Chair or a combined Board Chair and CEO and is open to different structures as circumstances may warrant. The roles of our Board Chair and Chief Executive Officer were split. Ourhave been split for over ten years. Mr. Snowden, our Chief Executive Officer and President, is responsible for the general management and operation of the business, providing guidance and oversight ofto senior management and formulating the strategic direction of the Company. The Chairman of our Board Chair is responsible for the content, quality and timeliness of information sentprovided to our Board and consults with our Board and Chief Executive Officer regarding oversight of our business affairs.
In addition, the Board has appointed Barbara Shattuck Kohn as its Lead Independent Director to, among other things, facilitate communication between management and the independent directors. The responsibilities of the Lead Independent Director include:
• Consulting with the Board Chair regarding the information, agendas and schedules of Board and Board Committee meetings, including the ability to add items to the agendas for any meeting;
 • Scheduling, setting the agenda for and serving as Chair of meetings of independent directors;
 • Serving as principal liaison between the independent directors and the Board Chair and between the independent directors and senior management;
 • Presiding at all meetings of the Board at which the Board Chair is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors; and
 • In the event of the death, incapacity, resignation or removal of the Board Chair, serving as the acting Board Chair until a new Board Chair is selected.
2023 Board and Committee MeetingsBOARD MEETINGS HELD IN 2023: 19
Each member of the Board believes thatcontributes a substantial amount of time and effort to serve as a Board and Committee member. In addition to Board and Committee meetings, our Board of Directors and its Committees act by written consent from time to time as appropriate. Further, Board members are encouraged to, and regularly do, engage in informal discussions with each other and members of management, and they are provided periodic management reports and updates. The independent directors meet periodically in executive session.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, our Board met frequently to consider the Company’s strategic direction, resulting in the decision to separateenter into a strategic long-term alliance with ESPN, and each of the rolesCompany’s directors attended at least 75% of Chairmanthe meetings of the Board and Chief Executive Officer has been beneficial, both with regards to corporate governance and operational execution.

        The Board also believes that it has meaningful structural mechanisms for effective independent oversight of management's accountability. Six of the eight membersCommittees of the Board of which he or she was a member in 2023. The Company encourages directors to attend shareholder meetings, and each of the Company’s directors attended the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

32 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Committees of the Board
The Board maintains four standing Committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compliance Committee. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until as otherwise determined by our board of directors. Mr. Jacquemin served on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee during 2023 and is not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting. The specific duties and operation of each Committee are described in more detail below. The Board has determined that each director serving on the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent directors. Moreover,under the Board's committees are comprised exclusivelyNasdaq Rules and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. The Compliance Committee also includes an independent directors (innon-director subject matter expert. Each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors that is reviewed annually and is available at https://www.pennentertainment.com/Investors/Corporate-Governance.
Audit Committee
AUDIT COMMITTEE MEMBERSMEETINGS HELD IN 2023: 10



Jane Scaccetti
Chair
Barbara Shattuck Kohn
Member
Saul Reibstein
Member
In addition to being independent as noted above, the two non-directorBoard has determined that each member of the Audit Committee also meets the financial literacy requirements under the Nasdaq Rules and is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the rules and regulations of the SEC. In addition, Ms. Scaccetti has practiced as a certified public accountant since 1977 and has significant experience as an Audit Committee member on several public-company boards, which makes her particularly well qualified to serve as Chair of the Audit Committee.
Key Responsibilities:
Serving as an independent and objective party to monitor the Company’s financial reporting process and internal control system;
Reviewing and appraising the audit efforts of the Company’s independent auditors and internal auditors and monitoring their independence;
Maintaining free and open communication with and among the independent auditors, the internal auditors, and the financial and senior management of the Company and the Board;
Reviewing and pre-approving all conflicts of interest and related-person transactions involving Board members or executive officers; and
Engaging with the Chief Information Officer and broader Cybersecurity Committee to discuss cybersecurity risks and potential adjustments to cybersecurity policies, standards and processes.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 33
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
In discharging its oversight role, the Audit Committee is empowered to investigate any matter brought to its attention or that it believes should be investigated. The Audit Committee may at any time engage, at the expense of the Company, independent counsel or other advisors as it deems necessary to carry out its duties. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors that is reviewed annually and is available at https://www.pennentertainment.com/Investors/ Corporate-Governance.
Compensation Committee
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MEMBERSMEETINGS HELD IN 2023: 4




Barbara Shattuck Kohn
Chair
Marla Kaplowitz
Member
Vimla Black-Gupta
Member
Saul Reibstein
Member
In addition to being independent as noted above, each member of the Compensation Committee is also a non-employee director according to Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, and an outside director, as defined under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Key Responsibilities:
Annually evaluating the performance of all executive officers and approving – and for the CEO, recommending to the Board for approval – all executive officer compensation design and levels, employment agreements and separation agreements;
Reviewing and recommending for Board approval the performance criteria, goals and objectives of short-and long-term incentive plans;
Reviewing executive compensation programs annually to determine whether they are properly coordinated and are achieving their intended purposes;
Assessing the Company’s leadership succession planning;
Approving the incentive awards that the CEO may grant to employees other than executive officers;
Monitoring trends and best practices in executive compensation;
Periodically reviewing executive compensation administration policies;
Recommending director compensation to the Board; and
Formulating and administering the Company’s stock ownership guidelines.
The CEO provides the Compensation Committee with performance assessments and compensation recommendations for each executive officer of the Company (other than himself). The Compensation Committee considers the CEO’s recommendations with the assistance of the independent compensation consultant and sets the compensation of those executive officers based on its deliberations. The Compensation Committee regularly holds meetings in executive session regarding executive performance and compensation, including establishing recommendations to the Board regarding the CEO’s compensation. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors that is reviewed annually and is available at https://www.pennentertainment.com/Investors/Corporate-Governance.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

34 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE MEMBERSMEETINGS HELD IN 2023: 3



Marla Kaplowitz
Chair
Ronald Naples
Member
​Vimla Black-Gupta
Member
Note: Mr. Jacquemin was a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in 2023 and is not standing for re-election at our 2024 Annual Meeting. Ms. Black-Gupta was appointed to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee effective as of our 2024 Annual Meeting.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee carries out responsibilities delegated by the Board relating to the Company’s director nomination processes and procedures, develops and maintains the Company’s corporate governance policies, oversees the Company’s ESG Committee and develops and maintains corporate social responsibility policies, and performs other matters as required by applicable laws, rules and regulations. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors that is reviewed annually and is available at https://www. pennentertainment.com/Investors/Corporate-Governance.
Key Responsibilities:
Identifying and recommending, for the Board’s selection, director nominees, including candidates recommended by shareholders;
Overseeing regular self-evaluations of the Board, its Committees, and its directors and making recommendations for improvement based on collected feedback;
Overseeing ESG risks and initiatives, including environmental and sustainability initiatives, social responsibility and DE&I;
Annually reviewing the Company’s corporate governance principles and guidelines;
Reviewing and recommending the appropriate structure, composition and size of the Board and its Committees;
Considering the Board’s leadership structure, including the separation of the Board Chair and CEO roles and the appointment of a Lead Independent Director;
Overseeing the Company's culture and talent strategy;
Making recommendations on the eligibility criteria for new Board and Committee members, including the skills, expertise, diversity and independence that should be represented on the Board and its Committees; and
Overseeing the Company’s orientation programs for new directors and continuing education programs for directors.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 35
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Compliance Committee
COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE MEMBERSMEETINGS HELD IN 2023: 5




Thomas Auriemma
Chair
Anuj Dhanda
Member
Jane Scaccetti
Member
Ronald Naples
Member
Note: Ms. Black-Gupta was a member of the Compliance Committee as described below). The independent directors typically meet several times per year in executive session. Both the Audit Committee and2023. Mr. Dhanda was appointed to the Compliance Committee have substantial internal staff and outside resources to assist them in carrying out their responsibilities. The Company maintains a 35 person internal audit staff overseen by the Company's Vice President, Internal Audit, who provides reports to the Audit Committee, and a 46 person compliance staff overseen by the Company's Vice Presidenteffective as of Regulatory Affairs and Chief Compliance Officer (the "Chief Compliance Officer"), who provides frequent reports to the Compliance Committee. Additionally, the Company retained two non-director members to serve

our 2024 Annual Meeting.

Table of Contents

on its Compliance Committee: Steve DuCharme, a former Chairman of the Nevada State Gaming Control Board with over 30 years of experience in law enforcement and gaming regulation, serves as the Chairman of theThe Compliance Committee andis chaired by an independent non-director member, Thomas N. Auriemma, joined by three independent members of our Board. Mr. Auriemma is the Company'sCompany’s former Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer and former Director of the Division of Gaming Enforcement in New Jersey, with over 30 years of experience as a gaming regulator in the State of New Jersey, serves as a non-director member.Jersey.

Key Responsibilities:
Assessing the adequacy of the Company’s compliance policies and procedures;
Assessing the effectiveness of the Company’s compliance efforts, particularly the training on and implementation of compliance procedures;
Reviewing executive compensation programs annually to determine whether they are properly coordinated and are achieving their intended purposes;
Monitoring audits and investigations conducted or overseen by the Company’s compliance personnel;
Monitoring any administrative investigations of and disciplinary actions against the Company or its executives;
Reporting to the Board any matters of concern regarding the Company’s regulatory compliance; and
Evaluating new directors for compliance with suitability standards.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

36 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Risk Management Oversight


The Board of Directors does not view risk in isolation and recognizes that a prudent level of risk-takingrisk taking is an essential element of the Company's operating and growthCompany’s strategy. As such, the Board takes an active role in the(as part of its meetings and through its Committees as described below) provides oversight of risks that may potentially impact the Company (including cyber security, economicwith respect to our enterprise risk assessment and political matters, among others) and the management team is charged with managing those risks. In fact, the Company is continuing to progress on a comprehensive internal enterprise risk management study.activities that are designed to identity, prioritize, assess, monitor, and mitigate the various risks that have the potential to significantly impact the Company.
Where appropriate, the Board has delegated responsibility with respect to oversight of certain key risk areas to various Board and management committees. The purposeBoard’s Committees each report to the full Board at least four times a year with updates on their areas of this exercisedesignated risk oversight responsibilities. Management is responsible for establishing and supervising day-to-day risk management processes and reporting to help the Board and its Committees, as necessary.
Board Committees
AUDIT COMMITTEE
 • Oversees integrity of financial statements and financial disclosures, effectiveness of the internal controls, the internal audit function, the external independent auditor, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, information and cybersecurity, and exposure to major financial risks.
 • Responsible for overseeing annual Enterprise Risk Management assessment.
 • Receives regular updates from the Chief Information Officer on cybersecurity matters.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE
 • Oversees risks related to compensation programs, executive compensation matters, talent management, and, in coordination with the Board, succession planning for the CEO and senior management.
 • A discussion of the compensation risk assessment process undertaken by the Compensation Committee is described on page 55.
NOMINATING & CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
 • Oversees risks associated with Board structure and director succession planning, including Board diversity, ESG and DE&I initiatives, and other governance policies and practices.
 • Oversees and receives regular reports from the Chairs of the Company's ESG Committee and Diversity Committee.
COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE
 • Oversees risks associated with the Company’s compliance with various gaming regulatory laws and regulations and the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s gaming regulatory compliance efforts, as well as the Company’s anonymous whistle-blower hotline.
 • Receives quarterly reports from the Chief Compliance Officer and the Legal Department on material Compliance Committee and legal matters.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 37
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Management Committees
CYBERSECURITY COMMITTEEESG COMMITTEEDIVERSITY COMMITTEE
Focuses on information and cybersecurity risks and readiness and oversees a robust cybersecurity program, which employs security scanning and monitoring tools, regular gap and threat assessments and audits and enterprise-wide security awareness exercises and training, as well as the procurement of insurance for cyber events, including ransomware coverage.

Chaired by the Chief Information Officer, who engages with our Audit Committee and the Board directly in accordance with our Cyber Incident Response Policy, in the event the Company experiences any material cyber events.
Comprised of senior management from different departments within the Company, focuses on developing and implementing policies and practices designed to foster a culture that helps to attract and retain diverse talent, and reinforces our longstanding commitment to being a trusted and valued member of our communities and a responsible steward for the environment.

Our SVP, Public Affairs & Government Relations serves as Chair of the ESG Committee and provides regular quarterly reports to the Board on the Company's ESG initiatives and reports to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee at every regular meeting.
Formed under the executive sponsorship of our CEO and comprised of senior management and team members from different levels of the organization to formalize and enhance the Company’s DE&I practices both within the Company and in our communities.

Chaired by the SVP of Regional Operations and provides regular reports to the CEO, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee on the Company’s DE&I initiatives.
KEY RISK MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT AREAS
• Market and macroeconomic environment
• Gaming legislation, regulatory matters, compliance and legal issues
• Technology, information and cybersecurity
• Business continuity
• Capital allocation and capital markets
• Human capital and talent development
• Board and executive succession
• Compensation matters
• Financial reporting
• Corporate social responsibility, including ESG and DE&I
• Regulatory compliance

TABLE OF CONTENTS

38 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors
Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Company better understand, quantify, mitigate and manageNasdaq Rules, to promote open discussion among non-management directors, the various risks the Company faces across the enterprise that could potentially obstruct the Company from executing its corporate strategy and achieving its goals. In addition, members ofnon-management directors regularly meet in executive session without management attend allparticipation. The executive sessions occur after regularly scheduled meetings of the Board of Directors and at such other times that the non-management directors deem necessary or appropriate. The Board and management work closely togetherChair, or, in the absence of a Board Chair, the Lead Independent Director, shall preside at such sessions; in the absence of the Lead Independent Director, the non-management directors present will elect a Committee chair to ensure that awarenesspreside at such sessions. If the group of salient risksnon-management directors includes any directors who are integrated intonot “independent” (as such term is defined from time to time under the Company's operations. The Company has also established a separate cyber security committee comprisedNasdaq Rules), an executive session of senior employees from different departments within the Company, which provides frequent reports toindependent directors shall be scheduled at least once per year. Currently, all of our Audit Committee and the non-management directors are independent.
Board on cyber security threats.

Resources

In fulfilling its objective,objectives, many of the direct oversight functions of the Board are performed by the Board's committeesBoard’s Committees with support from both senior internal resources as well as independent outside advisors. For example, the Audit Committee receives frequent reports directly from the Company'sCompany’s Chief Financial Officer; Chief Accounting Officer; Legal Department; Executive Vice President, Operations; Chief Compliance Officer; Vice President, Internal Audit, the Chief Financial Officer, the General Counsel, the Chief Operating OfficerAudit; and the Chief Compliance Officer.independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also has express authority to direct the Company'sCompany’s internal audit staff. Additionally, the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm Ernst & Young LLP, provides support through its annual audit and quarterly reviews of the Company'sCompany’s financial statements. The Compliance Committee is structured in the same manner, relative toreceiving reports directly from the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer and the Company'sother senior compliance staff, and also haswith regular access to other members of the Company'sCompany’s senior management team. A discussion
Both the Audit Committee and the Compliance Committee have substantial internal staff and outside resources to assist them in carrying out their responsibilities. As of December 31, 2023, the Company maintained a 60-person internal audit staff overseen by the Company’s Vice President, Internal Audit, who reports to the Audit Committee, and a 99-person compliance staff overseen by the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer, who provides frequent reports to the Compliance Committee. Additionally, the Company has retained Thomas N. Auriemma, a non-director member, as the independent Chair of the risk assessment process undertaken byCompliance Committee. Mr. Auriemma is the Compensation Committee is described on page 37 of this Proxy Statement.

        Further, the Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct (the "Code of Conduct") reflecting a variety of best practices, which is applicable to all directors and employees of the Company, including the Company's principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. The Code of Conduct, which is regularly reviewed and updated periodically, is designed to, among other things, deter wrongdoing, address potential conflicts of interest and promote ethical conduct, full and accurate reporting in the Company's filings with the SEC and compliance with applicable laws. The Code of Conduct also provides a 24-hour hotline that any employee, customer or third party can use to report, anonymously if they so choose, any suspected fraud, financial impropriety or other alleged wrongdoing. These reports are promptly investigated and receive the highest level of management attention, with particular focus from theCompany’s former Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer and the Vice President, Internal Audit, as appropriate. Subsequently, senior management provides investigation summaries to the Compliance Committee and the Audit Committee. A copy of the current Code of Conduct is available on the Company's website at www.pngaming.com/About.

        The Board has also adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines (the "Corporate Governance Guidelines") that set forth the Company's policies and procedures relating to corporate governance. These Corporate Governance Guidelines are intended to provide a structure within which our Board and management can effectively pursue the Company's objectives for the benefit of its shareholders and other constituencies. The Corporate Governance Guidelines include policies and procedures relating to,


Table of Contents

among other items, the role, structure and composition of the Board, Board procedures and leadership, risk oversight, use of outside consultants and conflicts of interest, including actual or perceived conflicts of interest arising from the two members of the Board who also serve on the board of directors of GLPI. The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly consider the efficacy of these policies. A copy of the current Corporate Governance Guidelines is available on the Company's website at www.pngaming.com/About.

        In addition to the above, the Company has adopted numerous other policies and procedures addressing the Company's operations and corporate governance, including stock ownership guidelines (which were recently increased for all named executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer), an executive compensation clawback policy, an equity-based award policy (to ensure the consistency and efficiency of the Company's equity award process), a corporate signature authority policy (to maximize accountability with respect to significant commitments) and a compliance and reporting plan. The Board regularly reviews the Company's corporate governance policies and practices to evaluate their effectiveness in identifying, assessing and managing risks and to achieve compliance with the requirements of Pennsylvania law (the state in which the Company is incorporated), the NASDAQ Rules, the SEC rules and regulations and state gaming regulations, all in the context of increasing shareholder value.

Succession Planning for Senior Management

        Our Board, in coordination with our Compensation Committee, carefully oversees Chief Executive Officer and senior management succession planning. Our Chief Executive Officer and our Senior Vice President of Human Resources provide the Board with recommendations on, and evaluations of, potential successors to the Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior management, including reviewing development plans recommended for potential successors. Our Board reviews potential internal candidates with our CEO and our Senior Vice President of Human Resources, including the qualifications, experience and development priorities for these individuals. Directors engage with potential chief executive officer and senior management successors at Board and committee meetings and in less formal settings to allow the directors to personally assess candidates. Further, our Board periodically reviews the overall composition of our senior management's qualifications, tenure and experience. The Company's talent management program, which seeks to develop and acquire talent below the senior management level, is an ongoing effort led by our Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President of Human Resources and is complementary to the succession planning.

2015 Board and Committee Meetings

        Each member of the Company's Board contributes a substantial amount of time and effort in connection with his or her service as Board and committee members. The Board held nine formal meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. During that same period, the Audit Committee held nine formal meetings, the Compensation Committee held five formal meetings, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held two formal meetings and the Compliance Committee held four formal meetings. Further, Board members are encouraged to, and regularly do, engage in informal discussions with members of management and they are provided daily industry clips and property results as well as frequent management reports and updates.

        During the year ended December 31, 2015, each of the Company's directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and committees of the Board of which he or she was a member. The Company encourages directors to attend shareholder meetings. Each of the Company's directors attended the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on June 17, 2015.


Table of Contents

Committees of the Board

        The Board maintains four standing committees—the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Compliance Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee—to assist the Board in achieving its objectives. The specific duties and operation of each committee are described in more detail below. The Board has determined that each director serving on one or more Board committees is independent under the NASDAQ Rules and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.

Audit Committee

        Jane Scaccetti (Chair), John M. Jacquemin (former Chair), Harold Cramer, Barbara Shattuck Kohn are the members of the Audit Committee. Each member of the Audit Committee satisfies the criteria for independence under the NASDAQ Rules and the rules and regulations of the SEC. The Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee meets the financial literacy requirements under the NASDAQ Rules and that both Ms. Scaccetti, the Chairman of the Audit Committee and Mr. Jacquemin, the former Chairman of the Audit Committee, are "audit committee financial experts" within the meaning of the rules and regulations of the SEC. In addition, Ms. Scaccetti has practiced as a certified public accountant since 1977, which makes her particularly well qualified to serve as Chair of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors that is reviewed annually and complies with the NASDAQ Rules and is available at www.pngaming.com/About.

        The principal functions of the Audit Committee are to:

    serve as an independent and objective party to monitor the integrity of the Company's financial reporting process and internal control system;

    review and appraise the audit efforts of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm and internal auditors and monitor their independence; and

    maintain free and open communication with and among the independent registered public accounting firm, the internal auditors, the Company's finance department, senior management and the Board of Directors.

        The Audit Committee is also responsible for reviewing and pre-approving all conflicts of interest and related party transactions involving the Board or the Company's named executive officers, including any actual or perceived conflicts of interest arising from the two members of the Board who also serve on the board of directors of GLPI. The Audit Committee will only approve related party transactions that are not inconsistent with the best interests of the Company and its shareholders based on a review of (i) the benefits to the Company of the transaction and (ii) the terms of the transaction and the terms available with unrelated third parties, as applicable. In discharging its oversight role, the Audit Committee is empowered to investigate any matter brought to its attention and any other matters that the Audit Committee believes should be investigated. The Audit Committee may at any time engage, at the expense of the Company, independent counsel or other advisors, as it deems necessary to carry out its duties.

Compensation Committee

        Harold Cramer (Chairman), David A. Handler and Barbara Shattuck Kohn are the members of the Compensation Committee. Each member of the Compensation Committee satisfies the criteria for independence under the NASDAQ Rules and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Each member of the Compensation Committee is also a non-employee director, as defined under Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and an outside director, as defined under Section 162(m)former Director of the Internal Revenue CodeDivision of 1986,Gaming Enforcement in New Jersey, with over 30 years of experience as amended. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted bygaming regulator in the BoardState of Directors that is reviewed

New Jersey.

Table of Contents

annually and complies with the NASDAQ Rules and the SEC rules and regulations and is available at www.pngaming.com/About.

The Compensation Committee evaluates the annual performance of the Chief Executive Officer (the "CEO") and other executive officers and sets their annual compensation, its authority and responsibility includes:

    setting salary, annual short-term incentive opportunities, long-term equity based incentives and other benefits;

    monitoring general and industry trends and best practices with regard to executive compensation;

    reviewing and approving, consistent with the compensation philosophy adopted by the Compensation Committee, any annual short-term incentive compensation plan for the CEO and other executive officers, and the related review and approval of the performance criteria, goals and objectives provided for in such plan;

    reviewing executive compensation programs annually to determine whether they are properly coordinated and achieving their intended purposes;

    periodically reviewing the policies for administration of the Company's executive compensation programs;

    assessing the Company's management and leadership succession planning;

    approving the number of incentive awards that the CEO may grant to employees other than executive officers;

    recommending director compensation to the Board; and

    administering and interpreting the Company's 2003 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan and 2008 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended (the "2008 Plan").

        The Chairman of the Compensation Committee is responsible for leadership of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may form subcommittees and delegate authority to them, as it deems appropriate. The CEO and other members of senior management of the Company may attend Compensation Committee meetings at the invitation of the Compensation Committee, but they are not present for executive sessions and do not participate in any discussion of their own compensation.

        The CEO provides the Compensation Committee performance assessments and compensation recommendations for each executive officer of the Company (other than himself). The Compensation Committee considers the CEO's recommendations with the assistance of the Consultant (as defined below) and sets the compensation of those executive officers based on such deliberations. The Compensation Committee holds executive sessions without management to facilitate candid discussion regarding executive performance and compensation, including establishing the CEO's compensation.

        Pursuant to the Compensation Committee's charter, the Compensation Committee retains the services of compensation consultants and legal advisors to provide such advice and assistance as it deems appropriate in its sole discretion. The Compensation Committee has the sole responsibility to oversee the work of any of its advisors. The Compensation Committee can terminateapproves the servicesfees and retention terms of such compensation consultants and advisors, and approves their fees and retention terms, which are funded by the Company.Company, and can terminate their services in their discretion. The Compensation Committee engaged an independent third partythird-party executive compensation consultant in 2015,for 2023, Exequity LLP (the "Consultant"(“Exequity”), who also served as the Compensation Committee's consultant the previous three years. The Consultant. Exequity provides advice and assistance to the Compensation Committee in carrying out its duties and responsibilities with respect to the Company'sCompany’s executive compensation programs and non-employee director compensation. Prior to engaging the Consultant,Exequity, and at least annually during the engagement, the Compensation Committee


Table of Contents

evaluates the independence of the Consultant.Exequity. This review includes receiving information regarding other services, if any, provided by the ConsultantExequity to the Company, the Board of Directors or other committeesCommittees of the Board of Directors, and periodically reviewing the fees incurred as a resultbecause of such other activities. In 2015,2023, the Compensation Committee determined that the ConsultantExequity was independent of the Company and that the retention of the ConsultantExequity by the Compensation Committee did not give rise to any conflicts of interest.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

        As part of

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 39
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Shareholder Outreach and Engagement
It has been our long-standing practice to meet with shareholders throughout the year so the Board, its ongoing services to the Compensation Committee, the Consultant frequently attends the Compensation Committee meetingsCommittees and supports the Compensation Committee in carrying out its duties and responsibilities with respect to the Company'smanagement can better understand shareholder perspectives on governance, executive compensation, programs by providing information related to metricsand other topics. A general overview of our biannual engagement process is below.
Shareholder Engagement Cycle

FALL

WINTER

SPRING

SUMMER
Board-led off-season engagement with shareholders to obtain feedback following the Annual Meeting.

Respond to shareholder inquiries and proposals to engage.
Review off-season shareholder feedback with the full Board and relevant committee to assess potential enhancements to the executive compensation, corporate governance and sustainability practices.
Publish Annual Report, Proxy Statement and Corporate Sustainability Report.

Board-led shareholder engagement to discuss items on the Annual Meeting agenda.
Review feedback and results from the Annual Meeting, corporate governance best practices, proxy season trends and regulatory developments with the full Board and relevant Committee(s) to identify key engagement priority topics and initiatives.
WE ALSO REGULARLY COMMUNICATE WITH SHAREHOLDERS THROUGH A NUMBER OF RECURRING FORUMS, INCLUDING:
• Quarterly Earnings Presentations
• SEC Filings
• Annual Report and Proxy Statement
• Annual Meeting of Shareholders
• Investor Meetings, Conferences and Web Communications
We relay shareholder feedback and trends on corporate governance, environmental sustainability, social responsibility, and executive compensation developments to our Board and its Committees and work with them to enhance our practices and improve our disclosures.
The Company holds quarterly conference calls in which management provides brief prepared remarks followed by an open forum for questions, during which the Company's industry, as well as among public companies generally. The Consultant also accumulates and summarizes market data regarding compensation of the Company's executives in comparison to its peer group and others. The Consultant gathers data andCompany provides advice regarding the Company's performance relative to its peer group, the structure of annual short-term and long-term incentive compensation, the appropriateness of financial and other disclosure beyond that which is required by the SEC on matters such as management’s views on Company performance, measuresindustry trends and pending legislation. Further, members of the Company’s senior management team actively engage in investor relations efforts including frequent participation at institutional investor conferences, shareholder meetings and management staffed tours of our properties. These regular, ongoing outreach efforts provide investors and prospective investors with constructive forums to discuss a wide variety of important subjects with management, including executive compensation, and provide useful feedback for management.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

40 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
2023 Off-season Shareholder Engagement Highlights
OUTREACHENGAGEDDIRECTOR LED
57%Contacted shareholders representing 57% of the Company’s outstanding shares during the off-season47%Engaged with shareholders representing 47% of the Company’s outstanding shares during the off-seasonEngagement efforts led by our Independent Board Chair, Compensation Committee Chair and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair
Outstanding share ownership calculated as of September 6, 2023
Many shareholders who participated in the 2023 engagement meetings expressed appreciation of the Board’s thoughtful approach to shareholder dialogue, responsiveness actions adopted last year, including enhanced proxy disclosure, executive pay program changes, and the designcontinued evolution of equity incentive plans.our sustainability practices.
2023 Off-season Shareholder Engagement - Key Discussion Topics
• Corporate governance priorities
• Cybersecurity risk management
• Capital allocation strategy and strategic initiatives
• Executive compensation program
How to Contact Our Board
Shareholders who wish to contact our Board can do so by writing to PENN Entertainment, Inc., 825 Berkshire Boulevard, Suite 200, Wyomissing, PA 19610, Attention: Secretary. The ConsultantSecretary of the Company reviews all such correspondence and forwards to the Board a summary of all such correspondence and copies of all correspondence that, in the opinion of the Secretary, deal with functions of the Board or Committees of the Board or that the Secretary otherwise determines requires the attention of our Board.
Succession Planning for Senior Management
Our Board, in coordination with our Compensation Committee, carefully oversees CEO and senior management succession planning. Our CEO, in consultation with our Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer, provides the Board with recommendations on, and evaluations of, and potential successors to, the CEO and other members of senior management. Our Board reviews potential internal candidates with our CEO, including the qualifications, experience and development priorities for these individuals. Further, our Board periodically reviews the overall composition of our senior management team’s qualifications, tenure and experience. The Company’s talent management program, which seeks to develop, hire and retain talent below the senior management level, is led by our Executive Vice President, Operations and our Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer, and is complementary to the Board’s succession planning.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 41
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons
Pursuant to the terms of its charter, the Company’s Audit Committee reviews all potential conflicts of interest and related person transactions. Any such matters that the Audit Committee determines are actual conflicts of interest or related person transactions are further subject to Audit Committee pre-approval. For purposes of the Audit Committee’s review, related-person transactions are transactions, arrangements or relationships where the Company is a participant and in which an executive officer, a director or an owner of 5% or greater of the Company’s common stock (or any immediate family member of the foregoing persons) has a direct or indirect material interest. The Company’s Code of Conduct has a broad definition of conflict of interest, which includes related person transactions, and requires employees to report potential conflicts to the Chief Compliance Officer. All potential conflicts of interest involving an executive officer, director or 5% or greater shareholder of the Company are communicated by the Chief Compliance Officer (or other members of Company management) to the Vice President of Internal Audit. The Vice President of Internal Audit then consults with members of the compliance, legal and finance staffs to determine whether the proposed transaction represents a conflict of interest or a related-person transaction that must be presented to the Audit Committee. For transactions determined to require Audit Committee review, the Vice President of Internal Audit collaborates with members of the legal and finance staffs to prepare and present the transaction to the Audit Committee. In terms of standards applied by the Audit Committee in reviewing related person transactions, a director will not participate in the review of transactions in which such director or his or her immediate family member has an interest. The Audit Committee will only approve related person transactions that are not inconsistent with the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, based on a review of (i) the benefits to the Company of the transaction and (ii) the terms of the transaction and the terms available to or from unrelated third parties, as applicable.
Currently, the policies to review related-person transactions is evidenced in the Audit Committee Charter, the Code of Conduct and the Corporate Governance Guidelines, and certain of the procedures followed in considering related-person transactions are based on past practice and the advice of counsel. Since January 1, 2023, there have been no related person transactions and none are currently proposed.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

42 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
PROPOSAL 2:
RATIFICATION OF
APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Introduction
Our Audit Committee has appointed the accounting firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024. Action by shareholders is not required by law, the Nasdaq Rules or our organizational documents in the appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm. This proposal is submitted by our Board of Directors for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance to give our shareholders a voice in the appointment of auditors. If the appointment is not ratified by our shareholders, our Board of Directors will further consider its choice of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm and may, but will not be required to, appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm. PwC has advised us that neither it nor any member thereof has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in our Company or any of our subsidiaries in any capacity.
For additional information regarding our independent registered public accounting firm, see “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” below. A representative of PwC will be present at the Annual Meeting. The representative will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Change of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 through December 31, 2023, Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) served as our independent registered public accounting firm. Consistent with its duty to oversee the Company's independent public accounting firm, the Audit Committee completed in 2023 a competitive selection process, inclusive of Deloitte, to determine the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024. Following the review and evaluation of the proposals of the participating firms, on September 26, 2023, the Audit Committee approved the dismissal of Deloitte as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, following completion of its audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. On February 22, 2024, when we filed our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, with the SEC, Deloitte completed its audit of our consolidated financial statements for such fiscal year, and our retention of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm ended as of that date.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 43
PR0POSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Deloitte’s reports directlyon the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, there were no (1) disagreements (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) with Deloitte on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to Deloitte’s satisfaction, would have caused Deloitte to make reference thereto in their reports, or (2) reportable events (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).
As a result of the process noted above and following the review and evaluation of proposals from all participating firms, on September 26, 2023, the Audit Committee approved the appointment of PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024, and an engagement letter was subsequently signed on January 25, 2024.
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted with PwC regarding any of the matters described in Items 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.
Vote Required
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is required for approval of the ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024. For purposes of the vote on this proposal, abstentions will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote, although they will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.
Board Recommendation

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2024.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

44 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Non-Employee Director Compensation
The Company pays fees to each director who is not an employee of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the annual compensation for each non-employee director consisted of an annual retainer of $50,000, plus an additional $10,000 for service on each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and has been authorized by it to work with certain executive officers of the CompanyCompliance Committee, as well as other employees in the Company's human resources, legal,applicable, and finance departments in connection with the Consultant's work$5,000 for the Compensation Committee. In addition, the Consultant engages individually with the Compensation Committee members.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

        Harold Cramer (Chairman), David A. Handler and Barbara Shattuck Kohn are the members ofservice on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each memberThe Chair of the Audit Committee receives an additional $15,000 annual retainer, and the Chairs of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee satisfieseach receive a supplemental $10,000 annual retainer. For 2023, each non-employee director had the criteriaopportunity to elect to receive his or her annual retainer in the form of either cash or shares of restricted stock, with forfeiture restrictions for independencerestricted stock lapsing on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

In 2023, each non-employee director other than the Board Chair received a grant of cash settled restricted stock units or restricted stock at his or her election with a grant value of $250,000, and the Board Chair received a cash settled grant of restricted stock units or restricted stock at his election with a grant value of $375,000. Each award of cash settled restricted stock units or shares of restricted stock vests on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines. We believe that equity ownership supports the alignment of director interests with those of the Company’s shareholders. To this end, the Compensation Committee has established stock ownership guidelines which provide that each non-employee director should own shares with a value equal to at least five times the current annual cash retainer amount, within five years from the date they joined the Board. All of our non-employee directors either currently meet our director stock ownership guidelines or we expect that they will meet the guidelines within five years of becoming a director. The Company’s Legal Department monitors compliance with these guidelines on an annual basis and apprises the Compensation Committee no less than annually regarding the same.
2023 Director Compensation Table
The following table sets forth information with respect to all compensation awarded to the Company’s non-employee directors for 2023.
NAME
FEES EARNED OR
PAID IN CASH ($) (3)
STOCK AWARDS ($) (1) (2)
TOTAL ($)
Vimla Black-Gupta70,000249,995319,995
David Handler50,000375,007425,007
John Jacquemin(5)
55,000249,995304,995
Marla Kaplowitz75,000249,995324,995
Barbara Shattuck Kohn80,000249,995329,995
Ronald Naples65,000249,995314,995
Saul Reibstein70,000249,995319,995
Jane Scaccetti85,000249,995334,995
Anuj Dhanda(4)
(1)
Reflects aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards granted in 2023, which does not include any cash fees that directors voluntarily elected to receive in shares of restricted stock as detailed in footnote (3) below. The amounts listed are calculated based on the closing price on the day prior to grant date computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
(2)
As of December 31, 2023, the following stock awards were outstanding: (i) for Ms. Black-Gupta 10,933 shares of restricted stock; (ii) for Mr. Handler, 14,520 shares of restricted stock; (iii) for Mr. Jacquemin, 10,420 shares of restricted stock; (iv) for Ms. Kaplowitz, 8,541 shares of restricted stock; (v) for Ms. Shattuck Kohn, 8,541 shares of restricted stock; (vi) for Mr. Naples, 8,541 cash settled restricted stock units and 2,221 shares of restricted stock; (vii) for Mr. Reibstein, 8,541 cash settled restricted stock units and 2,392 shares of restricted stock; and (viii) for Ms. Scaccetti 11,445 shares of restricted stock.
(3)
As described above, in 2023 each non-employee director could elect to receive his or her retainer fees in cash or shares of restricted stock, which vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant. This column reflects director compensation eligible to be paid in cash, which consists of the annual Board retainer and any applicable fees for committee members and committee chairs. Each of the following directors elected to receive restricted stock in lieu of such amounts eligible to be paid in cash, in the following amounts: Mr. Handler — $50,000; Ms. Scaccetti — $85,000; Mr. Jacquemin — $55,000; Mr. Naples — $65,000; Mr. Reibstein — $70,000; and Ms. Black-Gupta — $70,000.
(4)
Mr. Dhanda was appointed to the Board in 2024, and therefore was not paid any compensation in 2023.
(5)
Mr. Jacquemin is not standing for re-election at the 2024 Annual Meeting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 45
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Set forth below is certain information regarding each of our current executive officers, other than Mr. Snowden, whose biographical information is presented under “Proposal 1: Election of Class I Directors—Continuing Directors.”
NAME
AGE (1)
POSITION
Jay Snowden48Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Felicia Hendrix55Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Todd George54Executive Vice President, Operations
Chris Rogers48Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer and Secretary
(1)
Ages as of our 2024 Annual Meeting.
Felicia Hendrix has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President since March 2021, and Principal Accounting Officer since February 25, 2024. Ms. Hendrix oversees Accounting, Finance, Internal Audit, and Procurement. Prior to joining PENN, Ms. Hendrix spent 25 years on Wall Street and was most recently a Managing Director and Equity Research Analyst at Barclays, covering the gaming, lodging and leisure industries. Before joining Barclays, Ms. Hendrix was a Managing Director at Lehman Brothers. Ms. Hendrix holds a bachelor's degree from the University of Virginia and an MBA from the Darden School of Business at the University of Virginia.
Todd George has served as our Executive Vice President, Operations since January 2020. Mr. George oversees PENN's Regional Operations, Interactive, Marketing and Information Technology, as well as Design and Construction. Mr. George plays a critical role in execution of our omnichannel strategy, including our efforts to use our expanded digital database to drive increased visitation to our casinos. Prior to his current role, Mr. George served as Vice President and General Manager of Hollywood Casino in Lawrenceburg, Indiana, and Hollywood Casino St. Louis. In 2017, Mr. George was promoted to Senior Vice President, Regional Operations, overseeing nine properties in PENN's Midwest Region. Prior to PENN, Mr. George spent 12 years in various management positions at Pinnacle Entertainment, including leading the development and launch of Pinnacle's two St. Louis properties, River City Casino and Lumiere Place. Mr. George holds a bachelor's degree from LeMoyne College and an MBA from Villanova University.
Chris Rogers has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer since January 2020. In 2023, Mr. Rogers was appointed as Secretary and also assumed responsibility for overseeing the Company’s legal and compliance functions. In his capacity as Chief Strategy Officer, Mr. Rogers leads the team in developing and pursuing PENN's strategic growth initiatives. Over his past ten years with PENN, Mr. Rogers has served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Development, and Vice President, Deputy General Counsel. Prior to joining PENN, Mr. Rogers was a corporate attorney at the Dallas-based law firm Vinson & Elkins and the Boston-based law firm Ropes & Gray, as well as a CPA for PricewaterhouseCoopers and Arthur Andersen. Mr. Rogers holds a Bachelor of Business Administration from the University of Oklahoma's Price College of Business and a J.D. from Harvard Law School.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

46 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock, as of April 5, 2024. This table lists: (i) each person known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of any class of the outstanding voting securities of the Company, (ii) each of our directors, (iii) each of our named executive officers listed in the table entitled “2023 Summary Compensation Table” below, and (iv) all of our current directors and executive officers as a group. Beneficial ownership of shares is determined under rules of the SEC and generally includes any shares over which a person exercises sole or shared voting or investment power. Except as noted by footnote, and subject to community property laws where applicable, we believe based on the information provided to us that the persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock shown as beneficially owned by them. Unless otherwise noted below, the address of the persons listed in the table is c/o PENN Entertainment, Inc., 825 Berkshire Blvd., Wyomissing, PA 19610. The percentages shown in this table are calculated based on 151,867,302 shares of our common stock outstanding as of April 5, 2024.
5% SHAREHOLDERS, OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
NUMBER OF SHARES
BENEFICIALLY OWNED
PERCENTAGE OF
COMMON STOCK
Beneficial owners of 5% or more of our common stock:
FMR LLC (1)
15,824,94110.42%
The Vanguard Group, Inc. (4)
14,729,9209.70%
HG Vora Capital Management (2)
14,500,0009.55%
BlackRock, Inc. (3)
13,009,8688.57%
Executive Officers and Directors:
Vimla Black-Gupta32,9870.02%
Anuj Dhanda00.00%
David Handler223,4500.15%
John Jacquemin (8)
120,8420.08%
Marla Kaplowitz26,2030.02%
Ronald Naples20,5870.01%
Saul Reibstein (6)
37,0550.02%
Jane Scaccetti79,3240.05%
Barbara Shattuck Kohn (7)
28,5410.02%
Jay Snowden (5)
2,314,5981.52%
Felicia Hendrix (5)
95,2310.06%
Todd George (5)
218,6400.14%
Chris Rogers (5)
132,4630.09%
All current executive officers and directors as a group (13 persons) (6)
3,329,9212.19%
*Less than 1%.
(1)
Based on its Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2024, the number of shares in the table includes shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2023, by FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson. FMR LLC has sole voting power over 15,103,485 shares, shared voting power over 0 shares, sole dispositive power over 15,824,941 shares and shared dispositive power over 0 shares. Abigail P. Johnson has sole voting power over 0 shares, shared voting power over 0 shares, sole dispositive power over 15,824,941 shares and shared dispositive power over 0 shares. The address of the entity and individual listed above is 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.
(2)
Based on its Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on January 16, 2024, the number of shares in the table includes share beneficially owned as of January 12, 2024, by HG Vora Capital Management LLC. HG Vora Capital Management LLC has sole voting power over 0 shares, shared voting power over 14,500,000 shares, sole dispositive power over 0 shares and shared dispositive power over 14,500,000 shares. The address of HG Vora Capital Management LLC is 330 Madison Avenue, 21st Floor, New York, NY 10017.
(3)
Based on its Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 25, 2024, the number of shares in the table includes shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2023, by BlackRock, Inc. and its listed affiliates. BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 12,365,398 shares, shared voting power over 0 shares, sole dispositive power over 13,009,868 shares and shared dispositive power over 0 shares. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 50 Hudson Yards, New York, New York 10001.
(4)
Based on its Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024, the number of shares in the table includes shares beneficially owned as of December 29, 2023, by The Vanguard Group, Inc. and its listed affiliates. The Vanguard Group, Inc. has sole voting power over 0 shares, shared voting power over 53,742 shares, sole dispositive power over 14,531,892 shares and shared dispositive power over 198,028 shares. The address of Vanguard Group, Inc. is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.
(5)
The number of shares in the table includes shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding options or options that may be exercised within 60 days from the Record Date, as follows: Mr. Snowden, 1,515,753, Ms. Hendrix, 42,792; Mr. George, 152,315, Mr. Rogers, 87,812, and all current executive officers and directors as a group, 1,798,672 shares.
(6)
The number of shares in the table excludes 150 shares owned by Mr. Reibstein’s spouse, as to which shares Mr. Reibstein disclaims beneficial ownership.
(7)
The number of shares in the table excludes 1,750 shares owned by the estate of Ms. Shattuck Kohn’s late spouse, as to which shares Ms. Shattuck Kohn disclaims beneficial ownership.
(8)
Mr. Jacquemin is not standing for re-election at the 2024 Annual Meeting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 47
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors




Barbara Shattuck Kohn
Chair
Marla Kaplowitz
Member
Vimla Black-Gupta
Member
Saul Reibstein
Member
Compensation Committee Report
As part of our commitment to effective corporate governance, the Board engaged with our shareholders to obtain their perspectives on PENN’s business strategy, executive compensation, sustainability and governance practices. Members of our Board and leadership team met with shareholders representing 47% of our outstanding shares during off-season shareholder outreach. Each of our Board Chair, Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Chair and Compensation Committee Chair personally attended the majority of our off-season shareholder engagement meetings and would like to thank all of those who met with us to share your valuable perspectives.
The following Compensation Committee report to shareholders shall not, in accordance with the rules of the SEC, be incorporated by reference into any of our future filings made under the NASDAQExchange Act or under the Securities Act, and shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or to be filed under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act.
The Committee has reviewed and discussed the following CD&A with the management of the Company. Based on the review and discussions described above, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in this Proxy Statement.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

48 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) discusses the principles underlying our executive compensation policies and decisions for 2023. Our named executive officers for 2023 were:




Jay A. Snowden
Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director
Felicia R. Hendrix
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
Todd George
Executive Vice President,
Operations
Chris Rogers
Executive Vice President,
Chief Strategy Officer and
Secretary
2023 Performance Highlights
2023 was a year of significant operational and financial achievements for PENN. Our retail business achieved strong property-level margins, generating more than $2 billion in property-level EBITDAR, and we broke ground on all four of our exciting retail growth projects in Illinois, Ohio and Nevada. Our regional gaming assets delivered impressive results, providing a foundation for growth initiatives in our Interactive segment and facilitating our long-term omnichannel strategy.
It was also a transformative year for our Interactive division. In July, we successfully completed a full-scale migration of our online sports betting business to our proprietary technology platform across 17 states. Importantly, this migration provides us with full control of our product and technology roadmap, allowing us to quickly introduce enhancements for our Interactive offerings while maximizing cross-sell opportunities with our retail business. Then, in August, we entered into a long-term strategic alliance with ESPN, the undisputed leader in U.S. sports media, securing the exclusive right to use the ESPN brand for our U.S. online sports betting offering. Finally, in November, we successfully completed a rebrand our online sports betting product and launched ESPN BET across 17 states to very strong customer demand.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 49
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
2023 Performance Highlights (cont.)
We are constantly looking for new strategic opportunities to drive long-term shareholder value, as demonstrated through our transformative alliance with ESPN and our four exciting retail growth projects in Illinois, Ohio and Nevada, which are all set to open by 2026. The continued strength of our retail business provides us with a solid foundation to strategically deploy capital into our high-growth digital business, which is a critical element of our value creation strategy. To this end, our ability to accelerate growth by leveraging the leading sports media brands in the United States (ESPN) and Canada (theScore) is key to our omnichannel strategy, positioning us to significantly expand our digital footprint and efficiently grow our customer base across our retail, Interactive and entertainment verticals.
Looking ahead, we believe that our media and content ecosystem, together with our retail, online sports betting and online gaming channels, position PENN for growth and strengthen our position as a leading North America gaming operator. In 2024, we remain focused on maximizing the value-creation opportunities presented by our omnichannel strategy, leveraging innovative new integrations with ESPN and launching ESPN BET in new jurisdictions, including North Carolina (in March) and New York (later this year). We will also continue to focus on reimagining our properties through the use of new technologies and strategic capital deployment, which will allow us to further enhance customer experiences and better appeal to our growing digital customer database.

(1)
Reflects sum of Adjusted EBITDAR for our retail operating segments (Northeast, Midwest, South, West).
(2)
Reflects the sum of total revenues for our retail operating segments (Northeast, Midwest, South, West).
(3)
Property-level margin is property-level Adjusted EBITDAR divided by total retail revenue.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

50 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Alignment of Pay with Performance
Our executive compensation is predominantly at risk and long-term focused. We issue a significant majority of our executive compensation in the form of annual and at-risk, long-term incentives that deliver value only if our executives achieve pre-set performance goals or we achieve sustained long-term stock price appreciation.
2023 Target CEO Compensation
2023 Average
Other NEOs
Target Compensation



Note: the above pie charts reflect the target values of new incentives awarded in 2023. These values vary from the grant values reflected in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table, below, because the values included in those tables reflect portions of performance-based equity awards issued in 2021, 2022, and 2023 and associated with the 2023 performance period, in accordance with SEC disclosure rules. Because the performance targets for the 2021, 2022, and 2023 performance-based equity awards were set annually for 33% of each year’s overall targeted award, only the 33% portion of each year’s overall targeted performance-based equity award could be included in the proxy tables for the year in which the goals were established. In contrast, the above pie charts reflect 100% of the target value of the performance-based equity awarded in 2023, and none of the value associated with performance-based equity awards originally awarded in 2021 and 2022.
Annual total target opportunities adjusted to be closer to the peer median to maintain the competitiveness of our compensation program. Consistent with our pay for performance approach, the increase in target opportunity for our CEO in 2023 was delivered exclusively in the form of long-term equity incentives to foster a stronger alignment with the interests of our stockholders. Following these adjustments, the rate of our regular total target opportunities for our CEO and other NEOs remained positioned below the peer group median.
Incentive program payouts are aligned with performance. Our short- and long-term incentive payouts of 99.1% and 108.1% of the targeted levels respectively, were aligned with our robust 2023 financial and operational performance results, which were achieved despite ongoing macroeconomic headwinds and volatility in the retail and digital gaming spaces. Our leadership team remained focused on executing our omnichannel, tech-forward strategy that drove significant new user database growth, delivered on our property level margins goals and deepened our customer engagement across all product channels. These results reflect the momentum driven by our management team’s dedication to our highly differentiated growth strategy, one that positions the Company for successful long-term value creation in 2024 and beyond.
CEO realizable compensation for 2023 was 64% of target compensation levels, reflecting the alignment of our executive pay opportunities with company performance. As of the record date of this filing, stock options that represented 50% of the long-term incentive opportunities for our executives in 2021, 2022 and 2023 remain underwater and have zero intrinsic value, and likewise the 2021 CEO Supplemental Award is also underwater with no realizable value, which underscores the long-term alignment of our compensation program outcomes with our shareholders.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 51
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
2023 Target and Realizable Executive Pay Outcomes

Target Compensation: 2023 base salary earned, 2023 target annual incentive compensation and 2023 target value of the annual equity awards.
Realizable Compensation Value: 2023 base salary earned, 2023 annual incentive earned, the value of 2023 performance-based equity issued and earned based on fiscal 2023 performance and valued at target for 2024 and 2025 tranches, and zero intrinsic value of Stock Options issued in 2023, in each case valued based on stock price of $26.02 as of December 29, 2023.
2024 Performance-Based Equity Awards to reflect a three-year performance period and predominantly financial metric structure. In response to feedback provided by shareholders in our engagement sessions since our 2023 Say-on-Pay voting, the Compensation Committee approved a three-year performance period for our 2024 performance-based equity program (which is settled in common stock) with vesting tied to financial metrics (70% weighting) and quantitative operational metrics (30% weighting). Our 2023 and 2022 performance-based equity award grants will serve as a bridge to the new program design, with vesting of two-thirds of the 2023 award and one-third of our 2022 award, for which targets were traditionally set at the start of each annual performance period, to be tied to a 2-year and 1-year performance period, respectively, with the same mix of financial metrics (70% weighting) and quantitative operational metrics (30% weighting) being used for the 2024 performance-based equity award grant.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

52 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
2023 Say-On-Pay Vote and Shareholder Engagement
Our annual non-binding advisory Say-on-Pay vote on executive compensation is an opportunity for all of our stockholders to provide feedback on our executive compensation program. At our 2023 Annual Meeting, over 90% of shareholder votes cast – excluding abstentions and non-votes – were in favor of our Say-on-Pay resolution, which indicated restored confidence of our shareholders in our approach to executive compensation after significantly lower support in 2022. The shareholders we engaged with after our 2023 Annual Meeting provided positive feedback about our compensation program design and the changes the Compensation Committee implemented in response to the 2022 vote.
Our Board and the Compensation Committee recognize the importance of ongoing and regular dialogue with our shareholders beyond the annual Say-on-Pay vote and engage with our shareholders regularly about our strategic initiatives, compensation practices, corporate governance and sustainability priorities.
OUTREACHENGAGEDDIRECTOR LED
57%Contacted shareholders representing 57% of the Company’s outstanding shares during the off-season47%Engaged with shareholders representing 47% of the Company’s outstanding shares during the off-seasonEngagement efforts led by our Independent Board Chair, Compensation Committee Chair and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair
Outstanding share ownership calculated as of September 6, 2023
Key Themes from Shareholder Meetings
Our engagement team heard a diverse variety of feedback from shareholders in 2023. As noted, the shareholders we engaged with following our 2023 Annual Meeting provided overwhelmingly positive feedback about our compensation program design and the changes the Compensation Committee implemented in response to the 2022 vote. A majority of shareholders who met with us indicated they understood our current approach to compensation program design and performance metrics selection but indicated a preference for multi-year performance periods in the long-term incentive program, a stronger focus on financial metrics, and more detailed disclosure on our performance metrics, particularly for the long-term incentive program. In response to our shareholder feedback, for 2024 the Compensation Committee determined to update the design of our performance-based equity grants, approving a transition to a three-year performance period with a 70% weighting allocation to financial metrics. In addition, this year’s proxy statement reflects enhanced disclosure of the long-term incentive program metrics and earned performance-based equity awards for the last three performance cycles. We welcome our shareholder perspectives and look forward to continued shareholder engagement in 2024.
Compensation Philosophy
The Company maintains a compensation philosophy that is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee to guide our compensation decisions and ensure we attract and retain the executive talent needed to grow and further the strategic interests of our business. To this end, the Company provides a compensation and benefits program that is competitive with that of its peers and rewards the skills and expertise of its executive team. The Company’s program is designed to motivate and reward executives to achieve and exceed targeted performance results and enhance shareholder value. Compensation received by the executives is tied to the achievement of pre-established goals to align the executive compensation outcomes with the Company’s performance and their own individual contributions.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 53
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Framework
The primary components of our executive compensation program are base salary, short-term incentive compensation (cash bonus plan) and long-term incentive compensation (equity). These components of our 2023 compensation program are described in more detail below.
COMPONENTCEOOTHER NEOSKEY CHARACTERISTICS2023 PERFORMANCE METRICS
FIXED PAYBase Salary


• Fixed cash compensation designed to compensate executives for their day- to-day responsibilities based on the job responsibilities, individual performance, experience, expertise and qualificationsN/A
VARIABLE PAYSHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PROGRAM (“STIP”)
Short-Term Incentive Plan (“STIP”)


• Cash compensation tied to the achievement of pre-determined
quantitative performance goals
• Aligns a significant portion of target cash compensation to the achievement of near-term EBITDAR goals that support our long-term growth strategy
Adjusted EBITDAR
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PROGRAM (“LTIP”)*
Performance- Based Equity
(50% Weighting of Total LTIP)


• Equity incentive designed to motivate achievement of pre-set performance goals throughout a three-year performance period to drive long-term shareholder
value
• Performance metrics reflect key drivers of our long-term growth, including incentives to advance our omnichannel growth strategy, as well as to encourage progress on key sustainability
initiatives
• Settling in shares of our restricted stock to align interests of our executives with those of our shareholders, promote an ownership mentality, and motivate long-term shareholder value creation
Omnichannel
• Loyalty Database Activations
• Loyalty App Registrations
• Retail to Online Registrations
• Online to Retail Activations
Interactive
• iCasino Handle
• Online Sportsbook Handle
ESG/Sustainability

• Key metrics that promote inclusive culture across our organization, encourage inclusive leadership and incentivize progress on making our operations more energy efficient
Stock Options (50% Weighting of Total LTIP)


• Equity incentives motivate executives to build long-term
shareholder value
• Award vests ratably over a four-year period to encourage long-term retention
Stock options only deliver value to executives to the degree our stock price appreciates after the grant date, strongly aligning executive interests with shareholder value creation and motivating sustained, long-term outperformance
*
The performance-based equity weighting in the table above reflects the target values of new incentives awarded in 2023. These values vary somewhat from the grant values reflected in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table, below, since the values in these tables include portions of performance-based equity grants that were part of performance-based equity awards originally made in 2021, 2022, and 2023.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

54 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Impact of ESPN Strategic Alliance on 2023 Compensation Outcomes
In the first quarter of 2023, the Compensation Committee set our executive compensation performance metrics for the year based on our annual financial and operational forecasts, including targets for overall adjusted EBITDAR under the short-term incentive plan and targets for our Interactive segment, omnichannel performance and key ESG initiatives under our LTIP. The Company’s alliance with ESPN was not anticipated when these executive compensation performance metrics were set, and was therefore not reflected in the Company’s business forecast for the year.
In August 2023, PENN entered into an exclusive U.S. online sports betting agreement with ESPN, forming a transformative strategic alliance. The success of our subsequent ESPN BET launch resulted in significant user growth, dramatically expanding our digital database and strengthening our foundation for future growth across our omnichannel ecosystem. The ESPN BET launch was more successful than anticipated and resulted in more new users than we forecasted. As a result, we incurred higher losses than expected, primarily related to promotional expenses associated with new user growth. When deliberating how to reflect the financial impact of this new strategic alliance with ESPN and the results of the ESPN BET launch on our 2023 performance, the Compensation Committee took a prudent and balanced approach to (i) eliminate the punitive short-term financial impact of the losses incurred to support the launch of ESPN BET from the STIP achievement, and (ii) remove the unanticipated positive impact of the Company’s change in Interactive strategy from the LTIP achievement, as described in more detail below.
In determining the final payouts, the Compensation Committee approved adjustments to both short-and long-term incentive programs that it believed more reasonably represented full-year 2023 performance results achieved by our executive team, as follows:
• STIP Adjustments: Interactive segment results for the period following our decision to launch ESPN BET were excluded from the calculation of Adjusted EBITDAR. The Compensation Committee determined that it was appropriate to calculate Adjusted EBITDAR by only accounting for Interactive segment results for the period from January through the end of June, prior to the Company’s decision to launch ESPN BET, and that doing so accurately reflected management’s strong performance in 2023, distinct from the unanticipated change in Interactive strategy. These adjustments resulted in an increase of executive STIP achievement from 78.1% to 99.1% of target, as set out in more detail in “2023 STIP Awards” below. Please see Appendix “A” for details on reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures.
• LTIP Adjustments: The Compensation Committee exercised its discretion to reduce the achievement level for the 2023 performance-based equity awards for our executive team by excluding Interactive segment goals from the LTIP calculation entirely and including omnichannel results only for January to October 2023, the period prior to the launch of ESPN BET. By doing so, the Compensation Committee sought to limit any artificial inflation of the LTIP achievement resulting from the success of the ESPN BET launch. Through these discretionary reductions, the Compensation Committee lowered LTIP achievement from 141.4% to 108.1% of target, reducing performance-based equity awards to our executives by 33%, which the Compensation Committee believed to reflect management’s performance for the year more accurately than the unadjusted LTIP goals.
The Compensation Committee determined that these adjustments to STIP and LTIP achievements were reasonable and balanced and ultimately resulted in executive incentives which were more closely aligned with our operating performance for the year. Details on payouts are further described below in the Annual Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP) and Long-Term Incentive Program (LTIP) sections.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 55
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Process
The Compensation Committee is solely responsible for making the final decisions on compensation for our executive officers (our CEO’s pay is approved by the independent members of our Board), but has the authority to delegate any of its responsibilities to subcommittees as the Compensation Committee may deem appropriate, in its sole discretion, and is also supported in its work by an independent compensation consultant, as described below.
The Compensation Committee, in its discretion, has sole authority to select, approve, retain, terminate and oversee its relationship with the independent compensation consultant. In 2023, Exequity did not provide any consulting services other than with respect to executive compensation matters, to PENN or any of its executive officers. In selecting its compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee considered the independence of such consultant in accordance with the standards of the Nasdaq Rules, and theany applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.SEC and other applicable laws relating to independence of advisors and consultants. The NominatingCompensation Committee concluded that no conflict of interest existed that would prevent Exequity from independently advising the Compensation Committee.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
(comprised solely of
independent
directors and
reports to the Board)
• Oversees risks associated with the Company’s compensation policies and practices;
• Evaluates and determines the appropriate executive compensation philosophy and objectives for PENN
Entertainment;
• Reviews and approves annually the executive compensation peer group;
• Recommends the compensation of our CEO, subject to approval by the independent members of the Board;
• Approves the appropriate design and levels of our executive compensation program and compensation
arrangements for our other NEOs;
• Approves the performance metrics, goals, payout ranges and other elements used in the incentive performance-
based compensation plans for our NEOs; and
• Conducts an annual evaluation of our CEO’s performance in executive session.
INDEPENDENT MEMBERS OF THE BOARD
• Review the Compensation Committee’s annual evaluation of the CEO’s performance; and
• Consider the Compensation Committee’s recommendations with regard to our CEO compensation and, if appropriate, approve changes in target pay levels, incentive program design and final payouts.
INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT
(Exequity)
• Provides advice and assistance to the Compensation Committee in carrying out its duties and responsibilities with respect to the Company’s executive compensation programs and non-employee director compensation;
and
• Regularly attends Compensation Committee meetings and also communicates with the Compensation Committee Chair outside meetings regarding matters related to the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
(with the assistance
of Chief Human
Resources Officer)
• Provides input to the Compensation Committee with respect to the compensation-setting process to ensure that
compensation programs are aligned with our strategic objectives and reflect appropriate performance goals;
• Provides the Compensation Committee with input regarding performance of NEOs (other than himself); and
• Provides the Compensation Committee with input regarding executive performance and recommends base salary and annual short- and long-term incentive targets for each of our NEOs (other than himself).
Risk Assessment
The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include, among others, oversight of risks related to our compensation practices and Corporate Governanceplans to ensure they appropriately balance risks and rewards in relation to our overall business strategy and do not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk-taking behavior. In this regard, the Compensation Committee operatesannually reviews the Company’s compensation and benefits programs in the context of potential risks. The executive compensation program is structured as a balanced mix between fixed and variable, annual and long-term, and cash and equity compensation.
Base salaries are reviewed and set annually. Annual short-term incentive pay in 2023 was focused on achievement of a specific, readily quantifiable and meaningful financial goal (Adjusted EBITDAR) and was determined using absolute and objective performance criteria in reference to the Company’s annual budget. The other major component of our executive officers’

TABLE OF CONTENTS

56 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Risk Assessment (cont.)
compensation is long-term incentives through a mix (which may vary from year to year and by level) of stock options and performance-based equity awards that we believe are important to help further align executives’ interests with those of our shareholders. Such grants are subject to long-term vesting schedules and the annual bonus and performance-based equity awards are subject to maximum payout limits.
We believe that the focus on annual short-term incentive pay is balanced by our long-term incentive awards, which are granted annually, continually ensuring that executives’ incentive pay is aligned with our share price performance over multiple years. These cash and equity incentive awards, especially when combined with the compensation clawback policy described on page 67 of this Proxy Statement, appropriately balance payment for performance and alignment of executive compensation with shareholders without encouraging imprudent conduct or excessive risk-taking. Additionally, we have share ownership guidelines that require our executive officers to own a given multiple of their base salary in the form of our common stock, restricted stock or stock settled restricted stock units (ranging from six times for the CEO to three times for other named executive officers) to help ensure that the majority of executives compensation always has significant value tied to long-term stock price performance.
Based on the foregoing, we believe that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. We also believe that our incentive compensation arrangements provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond the Company’s ability to effectively identify and manage significant risks, are compatible with effective internal controls and are supported by the oversight of the Compensation Committee.
Executive Compensation Peer Group
The Compensation Committee reviews the total compensation package for each of the executive officers against data from a pre-selected peer group of companies, which are chosen based on data compiled by an independent compensation consultant. Consistent with the objectives of the Company’s executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee compares executive officer compensation against the median compensation opportunities of these peer companies to ensure that the Company is able to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers by providing a total compensation package that is competitive with Company peers. The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, reviews the Company’s peer group annually to determine whether any changes from the prior year’s group are warranted.
For setting 2023 target compensation levels, the executive compensation peer group consisted of the companies identified below, as recommended by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant and approved by the Compensation Committee. The peer group remained the same as the peer group the Company used for setting 2022 target compensation levels, as follows:
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE PEER GROUP
Boyd Gaming CorporationMGM Resorts International
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.Red Rock Resorts, Inc.
DraftKings Inc.Roku, Inc.
Electronic Arts Inc.Sirius XM Holdings, Inc.
Las Vegas Sands Corp.Wynn Resorts, Ltd.
Lions Gate Entertainment CorporationZynga inc.
This executive compensation peer group is comprised of core gaming companies and online and digital entertainment companies, which reflects PENN’s evolving operational complexity and a greater emphasis on online and digital entertainment. These peer companies were selected because they met certain criteria based on similarity of their business, market capitalization and annual revenues, and the fact that they serve as competitors for PENN’s executive talent. The Compensation Committee reviewed the peer group in October 2022, and at that time the Company ranked at the 65th percentile of this group in annual revenue, at the 71st percentile in the number of employees, and at the 16th percentile in market capitalization.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 57
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Elements of Executive Compensation
Our executive compensation program consists of the following primary components: base salary, annual short-term cash bonus incentive and long-term incentive compensation.
Base Salary
Base salary is the fixed element of an executive officer’s annual cash compensation and is intended to attract and retain highly qualified executives and to compensate them for expected day-to-day performance. The Compensation Committee reviews the base salary for each of our executive officers on an annual basis and considers the following factors in making its determinations: the executive officer’s position, responsibilities associated with that position, experience, expertise, knowledge and qualifications, individual contributions, market factors, the industry in which we operate and compete, recruitment and retention factors, the executive officer’s individual compensation history, salary levels of the other members of our executive team, the median salaries of similarly situated/comparable executives in our peer group, and our overall compensation philosophy. When establishing our named executive officers’ annual base salaries, the Compensation Committee references the peer group median salaries.
Set forth in the table below are the 2022 and 2023 base salaries for each of our named executive officers, along with year-over- year percentage market-based pay increases that were designed to bring base salaries of our executives closer to the peer group median for the comparable executive roles and scope of responsibilities.
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER2023 BASE SALARY2022 BASE SALARYPERCENT INCREASE FROM 2022
Jay Snowden$1,800,000$1,800,0000%
Felicia Hendrix$850,000$715,00019%
Todd George$950,000$900,0006%
Chris Rogers$725,000$675,0007%
Annual Short-Term Incentive Plan (“STIP”)
Our executive officers are eligible to participate in the short-term cash incentive plan (STIP), which is intended to motivate the executive officers to achieve short-term company performance goals that are key to long-term Company success and strong share price performance. The STIP provides payout opportunities based on the achievement of pre-determined corporate performance objective(s), with actual STIP bonuses earned based on the achievement of such performance objective(s) each fiscal year.
The Compensation Committee sets the range of STIP opportunity payable to each executive as a percentage of annual base salary, consistent with the incentive programs and practices used by the Company’s peer group. When establishing our named executive officers’ target STIP opportunities, the Compensation Committee references the peer group median target bonus levels. The 2023 target STIP opportunities for our named executive officers, as well as payout levels for threshold and maximum performance, remained unchanged from the prior year at 250% of base salary for our CEO and 100% of base salary for the other NEOs.
No compensation is awarded to executives for below-threshold performance, except in instances where the Compensation Committee determines that an adjustment to the performance metric(s) is warranted. If corporate performance is between performance levels (i.e., between threshold and target, or between target and maximum), the actual amount of the award that is earned will be determined by linear interpolation using the two identified levels of performance. Annual STIP incentive opportunities are capped at the maximum bonus levels, equivalent to 150% of target for each executive, regardless of the extent to which performance exceeds the maximum performance level.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

58 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
2023 STIP Awards
The Compensation Committee approved Adjusted EBITDAR as the performance metric for the 2023 STIP because Adjusted EBITDAR is an objective and quantifiable measurement for the Company’s financial performance that balances an aggressive approach to executing on our highly differentiated strategy with a disciplined approach to spending to support our long-term growth priorities. It is also a common performance metric in the industry used by our investors to evaluate the Company’s performance relative to other industry peers.
In order to determine the appropriate rigor of Adjusted EBITDAR as the metric for the 2023 STIP, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s 2023 operating plan. Based on this analysis, in early 2023, the Compensation Committee approved “threshold,” “target” and “maximum” performance levels for the Adjusted EBITDAR goal. The target performance level for Adjusted EBITDAR represented an increase over last year’s target and was deemed by the Compensation Committee to be rigorous and reflect the Company’s internal business plan and overall macroeconomic outlook at the start of 2023. At that time, the Company’s transformative strategic alliance with ESPN was not anticipated and therefore was not reflected in the Company’s business forecast for the year.
As described above, in August 2023, PENN entered into an exclusive U.S. online sports betting agreement with ESPN, forming a transformative strategic alliance. The success of our subsequent ESPN BET launch resulted in significant user growth, dramatically expanding our digital database and strengthening our foundation for future growth across our omnichannel ecosystem. The ESPN BET launch was more successful than anticipated and resulted in more new users than we forecasted. As a result, we incurred higher losses than expected, primarily related to promotional expenses associated with new user growth. When deliberating how to reflect the financial impact of this new strategic alliance with ESPN and the results of the ESPN BET launch on our 2023 performance, the Compensation Committee took a prudent and balanced approach to (i) eliminate the punitive short-term financial impact of the losses incurred to support the launch of ESPN BET from the STIP achievement, and (ii) remove the unanticipated positive impact of the Company’s change in Interactive strategy from the LTIP achievement, as described in more detail below.
The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to adjust quantitative results to account for factors that were unforeseen at the time compensation targets were established, and therefore made adjustments that it believed were reasonable and balanced, to reflect the impact of the strategic alliance with ESPN. These adjustments ultimately resulted in STIP achievement that was more closely aligned with our operating performance for the year.
For the reasons described above, and as detailed in “Impact of ESPN Strategic Alliance on 2023 Compensation Outcomes” on page 54, the Compensation Committee approved adjustments to target and achieved performance levels for Adjusted EBITDAR, which resulted in an increase in payout levels under our STIP to 99.1% of target, from the unadjusted achievement of 78.1% of target, as follows:
• First, the performance target and actual results for Corporate Adjusted EBITDAR were adjusted from $1.923 billion to $1.915 billion, and from $1.513 billion to $1.897 billion, respectively, to remove Interactive results from both the performance target and actual results, resulting in an adjusted payout percentage of 99.6% of target; and
• The Compensation Committee then used its discretion to reduce the overall STIP achievement by 50-basis points, from 99.6% to 99.1%, to reflect the Interactive segment’s performance from January to June, the period prior to the Company’s decision to enter into the strategic long-term alliance with ESPN.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 59
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
2023 STIP Awards (cont.)
Full detail on the adjusted target, threshold, maximum and actual performance levels for the 2023 STIP metric are set forth below:
2023 STIP Performance Metric
Threshold
(85% of Target)
Target
(100% of Target)
Maximum
(115% of Target)
Achievement
($)
Payout
(% of Target)
Corporate Adjusted EBITDAR$1.647B$1.938B$2.229B$1.513B78.1%
Final Adjustment to Corporate Adjusted EBITDAR$1.628B$1.915B​$2.202B$1.897B99.1%
During the first quarter of 2024, based on our Adjusted EBITDAR for 2023, the Compensation Committee approved the following STIP awards for the named executive officers (the Board approved the Chief Executive Officer’s STIP award following the Compensation Committee’s recommendation):
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER
2023 ANNUAL INCENTIVE OPPORTUNITY
(% of Base Salary)
TARGET STIP
OPPORTUNITY
ADJUSTED STIP
PAYOUT LEVEL
ACTUAL 2023
STIP PAYOUT
Jay Snowden250%$4,500,00099.1%$4,365,000
Felicia Hendrix100%$850,00099.1%$824,500
Todd George100%$950,00099.1%$929,417
Chris Rogers100%$725,00099.1%$703,250

TABLE OF CONTENTS

60 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Long-Term Incentive Program (“LTIP”)
We maintain a long-term incentive program (LTIP) for our executive officers to encourage an ownership mindset and incentivize long-term value creation. The long-term incentives are delivered through a combination of time- and performance-based awards. Performance-based equity awards motivate progress toward our strategic and operational priorities that are critical for our ability to create long-term shareholder value. Both time- and performance-based awards are tied to our stock price value and vest over three- and four-year periods, respectively, to incentivize executives to drive sustained value creation by successfully executing a range of strategic initiatives that advance our long-term growth priorities.
Each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determines an aggregate target value for the time-based and performance-based portions of the annual LTIP award for each executive officer, which in 2023 were below (but generally within a competitive range of) the median target opportunities, and which were generally consistent with incentive program design prevalence among the Company’s peer group, as well as broader industry and market standards and best governance practices.
Due to the transformational nature of our omnichannel growth strategy, at the beginning of 2023 the Compensation Committee determined that it was not feasible to forecast reliable three-year performance targets for the full 2023-2025 performance cycle. To maintain the rigor of the compensation program and effectively incentivize progress toward our strategic priorities, the Compensation Committee maintained the historical practice of setting annual performance targets for each year of the three- year performance cycle under the 2023 performance-based equity grant under the LTIP program. To foster alignment with our shareholders, any earned shares were subject to service-based vesting requirements through the end of the three-year performance cycle.
For 2024, in response to the input of our shareholders in the shareholder engagement sessions following our 2023 Say-on-Pay voting and given our recent transformational alliance with ESPN, the Compensation Committee determined to update the design of our long-term performance program by introducing a three-year cumulative performance period and to allocate a 70% weighting to financial metrics, with the remaining 30% weighting allocated to strategic operational metrics.
In light of the new design applicable to the 2024 performance-based equity awards, the Compensation Committee approved a cumulative two-year performance period for the 2024 – 2025 outstanding portion of the 2023 performance-based equity awards, instead of two one-year performance periods, and determined that this two-year performance period should utilize a performance metric structure that reflects a 70% allocation to financial performance measures and 30% allocation to strategic operational metrics. The third and final tranche of the 2022 performance-based equity awards will similarly be based on 2024 performance using this same 70% financial and 30% operational metric weighting, but with the remaining one-year performance period.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 61
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
2023 LTIP Awards
Below is an overview of the long-term incentives as approved by the Compensation Committee for 2023 grant cycle:
EQUITY
VEHICLE
PURPOSE
WEIGHTING FOR CEO
AND OTHER NEOS
2023 PERFORMANCE METRICS
Performance- Based Equity AwardsIncentivize performance on key financial, strategic and operational metrics that drive success of the transformation strategy and our ability to create long-term value

• 2023 Performance-Based Equity Award is split into two tranches:
• Tranche 1: 1/3 of the target award value, with payout contingent upon strategic and operational metrics tied to omnichannel, interactive segment and ESG priorities, based on a one-year performance period for 2023. Any earned shares are subject to service-based vesting requirements through the end of the three-year performance period
• Tranche 2: 2/3 of the target award value, with payout for the two-year performance period, covering 2024 and 2025, based on the new performance metrics structure of 70% allocation to financial performance measures and the remaining 30% weighting allocated to strategic operational metrics
• Payouts range between 0-150% of target
Stock OptionsIncentivize creation of long-term shareholder value through successful execution of the growth priorities

• Deliver value only if the Company’s stock price
appreciates from the grant date
• Vest and become exercisable at a rate of one-fourth per year over 4 years to support retention
The above pie charts reflect the target grant values of new incentives awarded in 2023. These values vary from the grant values reflected in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table, below, because the values included in those tables include portions of performance-based equity awards that were part of performance-based equity awards originally made in 2021, 2022, and 2023, in accordance with SEC disclosure rules that do not allow for inclusion of target award values in the tables until all of the performance targets have been fully established. Because the performance targets for the 2021, 2022, and 2023 performance-based equity were set annually for 33% of each year’s overall targeted award, only the 33% portion of each year’s overall targeted performance-based equity award could be included in the proxy tables for the year in which the goals were established. As such, the performance-based equity award values reflected in this year’s tables include 33% of each of the 2021, 2022, and 2023 performance-based equity target values. In contrast, the above pie charts reflect 100% of the target value of the performance-based equity awarded in 2023, and none of the value associated with performance-based equity originally awarded in 2021 and 2022.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

62 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Compensation Committee approved the following 2023 LTIP award targets for the NEOs (the independent members of our Board approved our CEO’s LTIP award targets) that reflected market-based adjustments designed to maintain competitiveness of our executive compensation program and bring the total target opportunities for our NEOs closer to the median pay levels of our peer group.
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER
2023 TARGET LTIP
AWARD VALUE
PERFORMANCE-BASED EQUITY
(50% of Target LTIP Value)
STOCK OPTIONS
(50% of Target LTIP Value)
Jay Snowden$11,130,000$5,565,000$5,565,000
Felicia Hendrix$2,975,000$1,487,500$1,487,500
Todd George$3,325,000$1,662,500$1,662,500
Chris Rogers$1,740,000$870,000$870,000
2023 Performance-Based Equity Awards
For fiscal 2023 performance-based equity awards, the Compensation Committee approved performance metrics that it believed were the best measures of our ability to create long-term shareholder value by incentivizing (i) closer integration between our brands to provide a seamless omnichannel experience for our customers, (ii) expansion of our market share, and (iii) progress toward our ESG priorities in support of long-term shareholder value creation.
Omnichannel metrics (60%) focused on incentivizing growth of PENN Play database and retail and online cross-sell opportunities to generate a greater brand loyalty and spend-per-customer, which are critical elements of our omnichannel growth strategy to support revenue growth and drive profitability. The Compensation Committee set targets to align with our operating plan and projections for new customer growth and expectations around marketing and promotional spend for the year. The Committee considered the performance targets to be rigorous and requiring a significant level of effort to be achieved.
2H Interactive metrics (30%) designed to incentivize growth of online sports betting and iCasino market share, which are key indicators of our future growth in the digital space. In light of the planned migration of the Barstool Sportsbook onto our proprietary technology stack in the second half of the year, the Compensation Committee set Interactive metrics based on performance for the second half of the year. This was done to both account for the unique operating environment during the pre-migration portion of the year, and to incentivize a seamless integration effort and minimize potential disruptions associated with a significant technological migration.
ESG metrics (10%) promote inclusive culture across our organization, encourage inclusive leadership and incentivize progress on making our operations more energy efficient.
Note: As noted above and further detailed below, the Compensation Committee adjusted the weightings of these metrics following the Company’s strategic alliance with ESPN, announced in August 2023, as this strategic alliance was not anticipated at the start of the year when the Compensation Committee approved the design of 2023 Performance Awards.
2023 Performance Results
In early 2023, the Compensation Committee considered various performance metrics and ultimately approved the goals in the chart below for the 2023 fiscal performance period, which represents: (i) first performance period of the 2023 Performance Awards, (ii) second performance period of the 2022 Performance Awards and (iii) third performance period of the 2021 Performance Awards.
As described in more detail in the “Impact of ESPN Strategic Alliance on 2023 Compensation Outcomes” section on page 54 above, at the time the Compensation Committee established the targets, our transformational alliance with ESPN was not anticipated. Due to the launch of ESPN BET, the Company dramatically overachieved against the original Interactive segment and omnichannel operational targets, and the Compensation Committee determined that excluding Interactive segment goals from the LTIP calculation entirely and including omnichannel results only for the period from January to October 2023, prior to the launch of ESPN BET in November, would most accurately reflect management’s performance for the year. As a result, the 30% weighting originally approved for the Interactive metrics was redistributed to the omnichannel and ESG metrics, and the targets and actual performance for the omnichannel metrics were adjusted to reflect a truncated performance period that ran from January to October 2023.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 63
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
2023 Performance Results (cont.)
The following table summarizes these adjustments, including the adjusted metric weightings, the adjusted omnichannel metric performance targets and actual performance results for the period from the start of the year through the launch of ESPN BET, as well as the original omnichannel metric targets for the full fiscal 2023 performance period. As a result of these adjustments, the aggregate payout for the 2023 fiscal performance period was reduced by 33%, from 141.4% to 108.1%.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

64 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Status of Outstanding Performance-Based Equity Awards
The Compensation Committee believes that the long-term incentive compensation awards granted to the named executive officers pursuant to the LTIP appropriately align our named executive officers’ focus with the achievement of the Company’s strategic objectives and with the long-term value return expectations of our shareholders. The following table shows the status of the Performance Awards granted since 2021, in each case measured as of December 31, 2023.
Based on the performance results achieved in 2021, 2022 and 2023, performance-based equity awards issued in 2021 for the 2021- 2023 performance period were earned at 119.2% of target.
Performance-Based Equity Award Results
Each Subsequent Year Represents 33.3% of the Target Grant Opportunity
AWARD YEARMETRICS
WEIGHTING(1)
ACTUAL
PAYOUT
% of Target
TOTAL EARNED SHARES FOR 2021
% of Target
TOTAL EARNED SHARES FOR 2022
% of Target
TOTAL EARNED SHARES FOR 2023
% of Target
TOTAL PAYOUT
% of
Target
2023 AWARDOmnichannel86%103.5%   
Interactiven/an/a  108.1%N/A
ESG14%135.6%   
2022 AWARDOmnichannel50%141.6% 99.6%108.1%N/A
iCasino
Market Share
30%0% 
Ontario Launch10%141.8% 
ESG10%146.5% 
2021 AWARD
Adj. EBITDAR
Margin
50%150%150%99.6%108.1%119.2%
Online Platform Launch50%150%
(1)
Weightings for 2023 Award reflect the impact of Compensation Committee discretionary adjustments to exclude Interactive results for the entire year and only include Omnichannel achievements from January 1 to October 31, 2023, the period prior to the launch of ESPN BET.
Based on the 2023 performance results, the following shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units were earned and credited to our named executive officers under our 2021, 2022 and 2023 Performance Awards. Prior to 2022, the performance awards were granted in the form of restricted stock. In 2022, to better align with industry compensation trends, the Compensation Committee determined that performance awards would be settled in restricted stock units. Any earned portion of the 2021, 2022 and 2023 Performance Awards remains subject to forfeiture through the end of the full three-year service period. Such forfeiture restrictions lapse earlier in the event of termination of service due to death or disability, or a termination of service following a change in control of the Company. In addition, with respect to the 2021 and 2022 Performance Awards, such forfeiture restrictions will also lapse upon an involuntary termination of service or retirement.
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER
2023 AWARD
(First Tranche)
2022 AWARD
(Second Tranche)
2021 AWARD
(Third Tranche)
Jay Snowden67,19141,53814,009
Felicia Hendrix17,7996,4642,698
Todd George19,8937,2363,009
Chris Rogers10,4106,1032,387

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 65
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Stock Options
Stock options represented 50% of the target annual long-term incentive opportunity awarded in 2023 and vest 25% per year over four years. Unvested options are forfeited unless the option holder remains in continuous employment with the Company through the applicable vesting dates (except as otherwise provided in the participant’s employment agreement in specific instances, such as terminations “without cause” or for “good reason” including following a “change in control”). As of the Record Date, in alignment with the experience of our shareholders over the last three-year period, all stock options issued to our named executive officers in 2021, 2022 and 2023 were under water.
Update on 2021 CEO Supplemental Award
No portion of the 2021 CEO Supplemental Award has vested. The CEO Supplemental Award issued on April 12, 2021, reflects a unique exclusively performance-based award structure, with vesting contingent upon achieving extraordinarily rigorous absolute stock price and relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) milestones. The unique two-phased design provides for a Phase II incentive opportunity only if at least one of the stock price milestones under Phase I of the award is achieved.
Demonstrating the tight alignment of our executive pay arrangements and performance, no portion of the CEO Supplemental Award has been earned over the last three years and its outcome remains uncertain. Unless our stock price appreciates 660% from the stock price of $17.36 per share on the Record Date in the remaining 1 year and 8 months of the performance period, the incentive opportunity under both Phase I and Phase II of the CEO Supplemental Award will be forfeited.
The award, which has been designed with the interests of shareholders in mind, consists of the following two phases:
PHASE I - “Stock Price Hurdle Award”: an equity-based grant with performance vesting conditions tied to the achievement of aspirational stock price hurdles, which must be maintained for 60 consecutive trading days, during the period ending December 31, 2025; and
PHASE II - “Relative TSR Hurdle Award”: an equity-based award that, contingent upon achievement of at least one milestone under the Stock Price Hurdle Award (Phase I), provides an opportunity to earn additional shares if the Company’s five-year TSR measured at the end of 2026 and 2027 equals or exceeds the 75th percentile of the S&P 500 index.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

66 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Update on 2021 CEO Supplemental Award (cont.)



TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 67
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Other Compensation Program Elements and Policies
Deferred Compensation. The Company does not maintain any defined benefit pension programs for its executives. The Company maintains an elective nonqualified deferred compensation plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) for tax planning and retirement purposes for our executives. In 2023, the minimum annual deferrable amount was $3,000 and the maximum was 90% of the executive’s base annual salary and/or bonus. Deferral elections must be made before the beginning of the year in which compensation will be earned. The Company’s contributions under the plan in 2023 were equal to 50% of the participant’s deferral for the first 10% of the salary and/or bonus deferred, subject to a maximum annual Company contribution equal to 5% of the participant’s salary and/or bonus. All amounts credited to an executive’s account are invested, as directed by the executive, in commonly available mutual funds, and the Company does not guarantee any minimum returns. The plan is unfunded, and benefits are paid from the Company’s general assets; however, the Company currently contributes funds into a grantor trust on a monthly basis in respect of these deferred compensation obligations. The Company generally sets aside separately the amounts deferred by the executives and the matching contributions thereon and, to protect against excess liabilities, invests such amounts in the mutual funds notionally selected by each executive. This program is described in more detail beginning on page 72.
The Compensation Committee believes that the Deferred Compensation Plan is necessary to attract and retain our executives and is consistent with competitive and industry practices.
Benefits and Perquisites. We offer a set of benefits to all of our employees, including medical, dental and vision insurance, group life insurance, short- and long-term disability and a 401(k) with certain contributions matched by us in 2023. We believe that executives should be offered benefits and perquisites that are reasonable relative to the benefits provided to all employees and that are consistent with competitive and industry practices among the Company’s peer group. Consistent with these objectives, the Company also provides certain executive officers with selected supplemental benefits and perquisites, including matching contributions under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan and financial and tax planning services. In addition, Mr. Snowden is entitled to life insurance in the amount of three times his base salary. He is also entitled to use of Company aircraft, which is important in ensuring efficient travel to our gaming facilities that are located across a wide geographic area without regular commercial flight alternatives and which is generally consistent with other companies in our gaming peer group that permit their chief executive officers to use the company’s aircrafts for personal use and commuting. In determining the supplemental benefits and perquisites that our executive officers are entitled to receive, the Compensation Committee evaluates the benefits and perquisites given by companies in the Company’s core gaming peer group. The description and value of such supplemental benefits and perquisites in 2023 can be found in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement.
Hedging and Pledging Policy. We maintain policies prohibiting each of the Company’s directors and employees (including executive officers) from engaging in hedging transactions (such as short sales, puts and calls and other derivatives), and pledging Company shares as collateral for a loan or holding shares in a margin account.
Compensation Clawback Policy. As a highly regulated, multi-jurisdictional gaming and racing company, the Company has maintained a long- standing commitment to ensure that its executive officers adhere to the highest professional and ethical standards. As part of this commitment, the Company adopted its Executive Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy (“Clawback Policy”) in compliance with Section 10D of the Exchange Act and Nasdaq Rules, effective September 19, 2023. The Clawback Policy is administered by the Compensation Committee and enables the Company to recover from specified current and former executive officers certain incentive-based compensation in the event of an accounting restatement resulting from material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements under the federal securities laws for the three most recent completed fiscal years. Such recovery will be made without regard to any individual knowledge or responsibility related to the accounting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

68 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Other Compensation Program Elements and Policies (cont.)
Stock Ownership Guidelines for Senior Management. We believe that equity ownership fosters an atmosphere where directors and officers “think like owners” and are motivated to increase the long-term value of the Company by aligning their interests with those of the Company’s shareholders. To this end, the Compensation Committee has established the following stock ownership guidelines for senior management, which are required to be achieved within five years of assuming the position subject to the guideline, and which are re-evaluated periodically.
POSITIONREQUIRED VALUE OF SHARES HELD
​CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERSix (6) times base salary
OTHER EXECUTIVE OFFICERSThree (3) times base salary
The Chief Executive Officer is authorized to set ownership requirements for other members of the senior management team as appropriate. As with the director stock ownership guidelines, the value of a named executive officer’s stock ownership at any time will be based on the aggregate value of common stock, restricted stock and stock settled restricted stock units held by such named executive officer. Each named executive officer is required to achieve compliance with these guidelines within five years of assuming his or her current position. Once in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines associated with their position, each named executive officer will remain in compliance with these guidelines regardless of decreases in the trading price of our shares or changes to their base salary until attainment of a position requiring a higher threshold, in which case the five-year compliance period starts again. We anticipate that all of the named executive officers will comply with the applicable guidelines within the required time.
Timing of Equity-Based Awards. The Company adopted an Equity Based Award Policy, under which, for regular annual stock option awards to executive officers, the grant date will be the second trading day of the calendar year. Performance-based awards are typically made during the first quarter of each year when the Compensation Committee approves the performance goals for the year. From time to time, annual grants may be made on a later date in the year as a result of the timing of the determination of the awards and terms or other factors, such as performance metrics for a given year. In 2023, the annual Performance Awards were approved by the Compensation Committee on February 28, 2023, for the NEOs (other than the Chief Executive Officer) and on March 8, 2023 at the regular meeting of the Board for the Chief Executive Officer. New hire equity-based awards granted outside of the regular annual pay program are made on the first trading day of the quarter following the award approval, and ad hoc equity-based awards are generally granted on the fifth business day following the date upon which the CEO approves such awards. All equity-based grants, whether granted on the second trading day of the calendar year or later in the year, are priced in accordance with the terms of the applicable equity compensation plans or performance-based equity programs, which require, among other things, that the exercise price of all stock options be established by reference to the closing price on the trading day immediately prior to the date of grant.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 69
COMPENSATION TABLES AND ARRANGEMENTS
2023 Summary Compensation Table
This Summary Compensation Table summarizes the total compensation paid or earned by each of our named executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and, 2021, respectively.
EXECUTIVE NAME AND
PRINCIPAL POSITION
YEARSALARY ($)BONUS ($)
STOCK
AWARDS ($) (a)
OPTION
AWARDS ($) (a)
NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN
COMPENSATION
($) (b)
ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION
($) (c)
TOTAL ($)
Jay Snowden
Chief Executive Officer and President
20231,800,0003,388,4805,564,9994,365,000423,82615,542,305
20221,800,0002,146,3264,814,9994,696,343617,94614,075,614
20211,786,15453,054,5624,050,0226,750,000246,47665,887,214
Felicia Hendrix
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
2023844,808751,0551,487,504824,500100,1504,008,017
2022712,500405,381857,987746,19791,4332,813,498
2021537,500375,000518,491779,989975,00025,0003,210,980
Todd George
Executive Vice President, Operations
2023948,077839,5801,662,504929,417100,1964,479,774
2022854,962914,511960,475923,853108,3253,762,126
2021722,4041,589,576870,0141,087,50055,9204,325,414
Chris Rogers (d)
Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer and Secretary
2023723,079526,479869,992703,25091,9792,914,779
2022671,202464,331810,051704,50489,8432,739,931
2021
(a)
Amounts set forth in the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted in each year as computed in accordance with ASC 718, disregarding estimates of forfeitures related to service- based vesting conditions. Performance Award values are based upon their probable outcome of the performance condition as of the grant date. For compensation purposes, Performance Awards are not considered granted until such time that the performance goals are established. For additional information about the assumptions used in these calculations, see (i) footnote (a) in the Grants of Plan Based Awards Table below, and (ii) Notes 2 and 16 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our 2023 Annual Report. The amounts presented in the Stock Awards column for each named executive officer during 2023 include the grant date fair value of their awards as follows:
Mr. Snowden
: (i) last one-third of the 2021 performance-based restricted stock award ($386,746); (ii) second one-third of the 2022 performance-based restricted stock unit award ($1,146,755); and (iii) first one-third of the 2023 performance-based restricted stock unit award ($1,854,979). As required under proxy disclosure rules, the full grant-date value of the 2021 CEO Supplemental Award, as detailed on pages 65-66 hereof, is reflected in Mr. Snowden’s 2021 total compensation. As noted on pages 65-66, unless the Company’s stock price appreciates 660% from the stock price of $17.36 per share on the Record Date in the remaining 1 year and 8 months of the performance period, the incentive opportunity under both Phase I and Phase II of the 2021 CEO Supplemental Award will be forfeited.
Ms. Hendrix
: (i) last one-third of the 2021 performance-based restricted stock award ($75,160); (ii) second one-third of the 2022 performance-based restricted stock unit award ($180,058); and (iii) first one-third of the 2023 performance-based restricted stock unit award ($495,837).
Mr. George
: (i) last one-third of the 2021 performance-based restricted stock award ($83,829); (ii) second one-third of the 2022 performance-based restricted stock unit award ($201,580); and (iii) first one-third of 2023 performance-based restricted stock unit award ($554,171).
Mr. Rogers
: (i) last one-third of the 2021 performance-based restricted stock award ($66,491); (ii) second one-third of the 2022 performance-based restricted stock unit award ($170,005); and (iii) first one-third of 2023 performance-based restricted stock unit award ($289,983).
(b)
The amounts reflect cash payments for 2023 pursuant to the Company’s annual short-term incentive plan, which provided for the payment of incentive compensation upon the Company’s achievement of pre-established performance goals. A discussion of our annual short-term incentive plan may be found in our CD&A under “Annual Short-Term Incentive Plan.”
(c)
For Mr. Snowden, All Other Compensation in 2023 consisted of: (i) $324,817 in Company matching contributions under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP”); (ii) $8,551 in Company paid insurance premiums; (iii) $20,300 in tax and financial planning; (iv) $6,600 in matching 401(k) contributions; and (v) $63,558 representing aggregate incremental cost for use of the Company’s aircraft which is based on variable costs of operating the aircraft including fuel costs, landing costs and repairs and maintenance.
For Ms. Hendrix, All Other Compensation in 2023 consisted of: (i) $79,550 in Company matching contributions under the DCP; (ii) $14,000 in tax and financial planning; and (iii) $6,600 in matching 401 (k) contributions.
For Mr. George, All Other Compensation in 2023 consisted of: (i) $93,596 in Company matching contributions under the DCP; and (ii) $6,600 in matching 401(k) contributions.
For Mr. Rogers, All Other Compensation in 2023 consisted of: (i) $71,379 in Company matching contributions under the DCP; (ii) $14,000 in tax and financial planning; and (iii) $6,600 in matching 401(k) contributions.
(d)
Mr. Rogers became a named executive officer of the Company in 2022 and, therefore, in accordance with SEC regulations, only compensation information for the fiscal year in which each became a named executive officer is included in the Summary Compensation Table.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

70 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
COMPENSATION TABLES AND ARRANGEMENTS
2023 Summary Compensation Table (cont.)
PERFORMANCE AWARD COMPENSATION DISCLOSED FOR 2023
YEARDISCLOSED VS. DESIGN20212022202320242025
2023 Performance AwardPlan Design Value100%
Value Disclosed in Summary Compensation Table33%33%33%
2022 Performance AwardPlan Design Value100%
Value Disclosed in Summary Compensation Table33%33%33%
2021 Performance AwardPlan Design Value100%
Value Disclosed in Summary Compensation Table33%33%33%
The grant date fair value assuming the maximum level of performance achieved under performance awards for the 2023 performance period are as follows: (i) $5,082,720 for Mr. Snowden; (ii) $1,126,583 for Ms. Hendrix; (iii) $1,259,370 for Mr. George; and (iv) $789,719 for Mr. Rogers.
2023 Grants of Plan Based Awards
NAME
GRANT
DATE (a)
AWARD
DATE (a)
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS UNDER
NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS ($)
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS UNDER
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS (#)
ALL
OTHER
STOCK
AWARDS:
(#)
ALL
OTHER
OPTION
AWARDS
(#) (b)
EXERCISE
PRICE OF
OPTION
AWARDS
($/SHARE)
GRANT DATE
FAIR VALUE
OF STOCK
AND OPTION
AWARDS ($)(c)
THRESHOLD
($)
TARGET
($)
MAXIMUM
($)
THRESHOLD
(#)
TARGET
(#)
MAXIMUM
(#)
Jay
Snowden
2,250,0004,500,0006,750,000
1/4/2023296,56629.275,564,999
3/8/2023(d)
4/12/20216,48312,96519,448386,746
3/8/2023(e)
3/9/202219,22238,44357,6651,146,755
3/8/2023(f)
3/8/202331,09362,18593,2781,854,979
Felicia
Hendrix
425,000850,0001,275,000
1/4/202379,27129.271,487,504
2/28/2023(d)
4/12/20211,2492,4973,74675,160
2/28/2023(e)
2/15/20222,9915,9828,973180,058
2/28/2023(f)
2/28/20238,23716,47324,710495,837
Todd
George
475,000950,0001,425,000
1/4/202388,59729.271,662,504
2/28/2023(d)
4/12/20211,3932,7854,17883,829
2/28/2023(e)
2/15/20223,3496,69710,046201,580
2/28/2023(f)
2/28/20239,20618,41127,617554,171
Chris Rogers362,500725,0001,087,500
1/4/202346,36329.27869,992
2/28/2023(d)
4/12/20211,1052,2093,31466,491
2/28/2023(e)
2/15/20222,8245,6488,472170,005
2/28/2023(f)
2/28/20234,8179,63414,451289,983
(a)
The grant date shown in the table was determined pursuant to ASC 718, which is the date our Compensation Committee (or our Board for the CEO) established the performance criteria for the first one-third of the 2023 Performance Awards, the second one-third of the 2022 Performance Awards and the final one-third of the 2021 Performance Awards. The award date shown above represents the date on which our Compensation Committee (or our Board for the CEO) awarded the target number of Performance Awards to the named executive officers when the date differs from the grant date.
(b)
Option awards represent stock options granted to the executives as part of their annual equity incentive compensation. The option awards vest over four years, 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 25% on each succeeding anniversary.
(c)
Represents the full grant date fair value of awards under ASC 718. Generally, the full grant date fair value is the amount the Company expenses in its financial statements over the award’s vesting period. Assumptions used in the calculation of the amounts for stock option awards and performance awards are included in Notes 2 and 16 to the Company’s audited financial statements in our 2023 Annual Report.
(d)
Equity incentive awards represent performance-based restricted stock awards approved on April 12, 2021 in connection with the Company’s 2021 Performance Awards. The aggregate target number of restricted stock having a three-year award period consisting of three one-year performance periods and a three-year service period were: (i) 38,897 for Mr. Snowden; (ii) 7,491 for Ms. Hendrix; (iii) 8,356 for Mr. George; and (iv) 6,627 for Mr. Rogers.
(e)
Equity incentive awards represent performance-based restricted stock units approved on March 9, 2022 for Mr. Snowden and February 15, 2022 for the other named executive officers in connection with the Company’s 2022 performance-based equity program. The aggregate target number of restricted stock units having a three-year award period consisting of three one-year performance periods and a three-year service period were: (i) 115,329 for Mr. Snowden; (ii) 17,946 for Ms. Hendrix; (iii) 20,090 for Mr. George; and (iv) 16,943 for Mr. Rogers.
(f)
Equity incentive awards represent performance-based restricted stock units approved on March 8, 2023 for Mr. Snowden and February 28, 2023 for the other named executive officers in connection with the Company’s 2023 performance-based equity program. The aggregate target number of restricted stock units having a three-year award period consisting of three one-year performance periods and a three-year service period were: (i) 186,557 for Mr. Snowden; (ii) 49,419 for Ms. Hendrix; (iii) 55,233 for Mr. George; and (iv) 28,904 for Mr. Rogers.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 71
COMPENSATION TABLES AND ARRANGEMENTS
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
This Summary Compensation Table summarizes the total compensation paid or earned by each of our named executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and, 2021, respectively.
NAMEOPTION AWARDSSTOCK AWARDS
NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED OPTIONS:
OPTION
EXERCISE
PRICE ($)
OPTION
EXPIRATION
DATE
NUMBER OF
SHARES OR
UNITS HELD
THAT HAVE
NOT
VESTED (#)
MARKET VALUE OF
SHARES OR UNITS
HELD THAT HAVE
NOT VESTED ($) (k)
EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
UNEARNED SHARES,
UNITS OR OTHER
RIGHTS THAT HAVE
NOT VESTED (#)
EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
MARKET OR PAYOUT
VALUE OF UNEARNED
SHARES, UNITS OR
OTHER RIGHTS THAT
HAVE NOT VESTED ($)
EXERCISABLE
(#)
UNEXERCISABLE
(#)
Jay Snowden105,76930.741/3/2025
51,863(h)
1,349,475
156,20319.451/3/2029
96,108(i)
2,500,730
38,443(l)
1,000,287
1,032,70618.818/6/2029
93,278 (j)
2,427,094
124,372(l)
3,236,159
44,820
44,819(b)
80.891/5/2031
300,000(m)
7,806,000
39,852
119,556(d)
50.641/4/2032
600,000(n)
15,612,000
296,566(e)
29.271/4/2033
Felicia Hendrix5,849
5,848(c)
117.822/23/2031
9,989(h)
259,914
7,101
21,304(d)
50.641/4/2032
14,955(i)
389,129
5,982(l)
155,652
79,271(e)
29.271/4/2033
24,710(j)
642,954
32,946(l)
857,255
Todd George5,375
(f)
14.101/4/2024
11,142(h)
289,915
13,36030.741/3/2025
16,743(i)
435,653
6,696(l)
174,230
25,40419.451/3/2029
27,617(j)
718,594
36,822(l)
958,108
45,796
15,265(a)
26.141/3/2030
9,628
9,628(b)
80.891/5/2031
7,949
23,849(d)
50.641/4/2032
88,597(e)
29.271/4/2033
Chris Rogers7,07414.101/4/2024
8,837(h)
229,939
3,58430.741/3/2025
14,120(i)
367,402
5,647(l)
146,935
24,29019.451/3/2029
14,451(j)
376,015
19,270(l)
501,405
17,614
5,871(a)
26.141/3/2030
7,636
7,636(b)
80.891/5/2031
6,704
20,114(d)
50.641/4/2032
46,363(e)
29.271/4/2033
(a)
The vesting date is January 3, 2024.
(b)
The vesting dates are January 5, 2024 and January 5, 2025.
(c)
The vesting dates are February 23, 2024 and February 23, 2025.
(d)
The vesting dates are January 4, 2024, January 5, 2025, and January 4, 2026.
(e)
The vesting dates are January 4, 2024, January 4, 2025, January 4, 2026 and January 4, 2027.
(f)
The option award consists of a Cash Settled Stock Appreciation Award.
(g)
The stock awards consist of performance awards, which were made under the performance-based equity program adopted under the 2018 and 2022 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plans.
(h)
The vesting date shall be in the first quarter of 2024 following the certification of performance by the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors, as applicable. Per instructions to Item 402(f)(2), since performance goals exceed the threshold, the disclosure reports the next higher performance measure.
(i)
The vesting date shall be in the first quarter of 2025 following the certification of performance by the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors, as applicable. Per instructions to Item 402(f)(2), since performance goals exceed the threshold, the disclosure reports the next higher performance measure.
(j)
The vesting date shall be in the first quarter of 2026 following the certification of performance by the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors, as applicable. Per instructions to Item 402(f)(2), since performance goals exceed the threshold, the disclosure reports the next higher performance measure.
(k)
Calculated based on the closing price of $26.02 for the Company’s common stock on December 29, 2023, which was the last trading day of the Company’s 2023 fiscal year.
(l)
These amounts represent the target number of performance-based restricted stock and restricted stock units for the performance periods ending December 31, 2024, December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2026. The final number of shares or units earned, if any, will be based on the performance achieved for such periods.
(m)
These awards make up the Stock Price Hurdle Award. A discussion of the Stock Price Hurdle Award may be found in our CD&A under “CEO Performance Based Supplemental Equity Awards.”
(n)
These awards make up the Relative TSR Hurdle Award. A discussion of the Relative TSR Hurdle Award may be found in our CD&A under “CEO Performance Based Supplemental Equity Awards.”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

72 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
COMPENSATION TABLES AND ARRANGEMENTS
2023 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
OPTION AWARDSSTOCK AWARDS
NAME
NUMBER OF
SHARES ACQUIRED
ON EXERCISE (#)
VALUE REALIZED
ON EXERCISE ($)
NUMBER OF
SHARES ACQUIRED
ON VESTING (#) (a)
2023 VALUE REALIZED
ON VESTING ($) (b)
Jay Snowden219,2222,445,285
Felica Hendrix1,06133,655
Todd George49,9651,422,329
Chris Rogers13,121354,137
(a)
The number of shares acquired on vesting includes 30,690 restricted stock units, which were settled in cash, for Mr. George; and 5,707 restricted stock units, which were settled in cash, for Mr. Rogers.
(b)
Value realized represents fair value, per share, as of the trading day immediately prior to the vesting date.
2023 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
NAME
EXECUTIVE
CONTRIBUTIONS IN
LAST FISCAL YEAR
($) (a)
COMPANY
CONTRIBUTIONS IN
LAST FISCAL YEAR
($) (b)
AGGREGATE
EARNINGS IN
LAST FISCAL YEAR
($) (c)
AGGREGATE
WITHDRAWALS/
DISTRIBUTIONS
($)
AGGREGATE BALANCE
AT LAST FISCAL
YEAR END
($) (d)
Jay Snowden649,634324,817875,8127,8616,066,251
Felicia Hendrix159,10079,550113,8951,596643,712
Todd George561,57993,596671,3282,2564,307,780
Chris Rogers169,31071,379193,1101,7181,338,450
(a)
For each executive, the executive’s contribution is included in the executive’s Salary column for 2023, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table.
(b)
For each executive, the Company’s contribution is included in the executive’s All Other Compensation column for 2023, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table.
(c)
Amounts reflect the change in account value during fiscal year 2023. No amounts are reported in the Summary Compensation Table because the earnings were not above market or preferential.
(d)
The amount of each executive’s aggregate balance at fiscal year-end that was reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for previous years is as follows:
(i) Jay Snowden: 1,532,676; (ii) Felicia Hendrix: 188,925; (iii) Todd George: 226,839; (iv) Chris Rogers: 148,064.
Deferred Compensation Plan
Pursuant to the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended, most management and certain other highly compensated employees selected by the committee administering the plan (the “Retirement Committee”) may elect to defer, on a pre-tax basis, a percentage of salary, bonus or combination thereof. The minimum annual deferrable amount is $3,000 and the maximum is 90% of his or her base annual salary and/or bonus. Deferral elections must be made before the beginning of the year in which compensation will be earned. The Company’s contributions under the Deferred Compensation Plan in 2023 were equal to 50% of the participant’s deferral for the first 10% of the salary and/or bonus deferred, subject to a maximum annual Company contribution equal to 5% of the participant’s salary and/or bonus. With the Board of Directors’ approval, the Company is also permitted to make discretionary contributions. Participants are always 100% vested in their own contributions, but Company contributions vest 20% per year of service with the Company. Therefore, employees with five or more years of service are fully vested in Company contributions under the Deferred Compensation Plan. However, for employees with less than five years of service, all Company contributions become immediately and fully vested upon death or disability, as defined in the Deferred Compensation Plan. The Retirement Committee may accelerate vesting of the Company’s contributions if a participant terminates his or her employment because of disability or his or her involuntary termination of employment.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 73
COMPENSATION TABLES AND ARRANGEMENTS
Deferred Compensation Plan (cont.)
Subject to the exceptions discussed below, participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan, or their beneficiaries, receive distributions upon retirement, death or termination. Participants can elect to receive distributions following retirement or death in the form of a lump sum payment or payment in five or ten annual installments. Distributions following retirement can be deferred for at least five years. For purposes of the Deferred Compensation Plan, termination of employment as a result of a disability will be considered retirement.
Distributions following termination of employment other than as a result of retirement or death will be in the form of a lump sum payment. Participants can also elect to receive a scheduled distribution with respect to an annual deferral amount, which is payable in a lump sum at the beginning of a designated subsequent calendar year, subject to certain limitations. In the event of an unforeseeable financial emergency and with the approval of the Retirement Committee, a participant can suspend deferrals or receive a partial or full payout under the plan. Certain specified employees have a six-month delay imposed upon distributions pursuant to a separation from service, as required by the final Code section 409A regulations. In the event of a change in control, the Company will accelerate installment payments that are in pay status by paying the account balance in lump sum and will distribute the account balances of all active participants in a lump sum; provided, however, that no distributions (or accelerations of installments) will occur unless the transaction qualifies as a “change in control event” under Code section 409A.
Participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan may notionally invest deferred amounts, including Company contributions, in mutual funds selected by the Retirement Committee. Participants may change their investment elections at any time.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
The following tables describe and quantify the compensation that would become payable in the event of a termination of a named executive officer’s employment under several different circumstances or a change in control. The amounts shown are estimates of amounts that would be paid to the named executive officers assuming that such termination or change in control was effective as of December 29, 2023, and include amounts earned through such time and are based (where applicable) on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on such date, which was $26.02 per share. Following the end of the prior fiscal year, we entered into a new employment agreement with Ms. Hendrix, which is further described in the section titled “ Employment, Retirement and Separation Agreements” below. Therefore, the tables below are merely illustrative examples of the impact of a hypothetical termination of employment or change in control. The actual amounts to be paid can only be determined at the time of such named executive officer’s separation from the Company and/or change in control. For a description of the severance and change in control provisions giving rise to the payments set forth below, see pages 76-78. In establishing the appropriate payment and benefit levels, the Company evaluates the practices and levels set by companies in its peer group.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

74 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
COMPENSATION TABLES AND ARRANGEMENTS
Post-Employment Payments—Jay Snowden
EXECUTIVE PAYMENTS
VOLUNTARY
TERMINATION BY
EXECUTIVE ($)
TERMINATION
WITHOUT
CAUSE BY
COMPANY ($)
TERMINATION
FOR CAUSE BY
COMPANY ($)
TERMINATION
UPON
DEATH ($)
TERMINATION
UPON
DISABILITY ($)
CHANGE IN
CONTROL ($)
CHANGE IN
CONTROL
TERMINATION
WITHOUT
CAUSE ($)
Cash Severance Benefit (a)
12,600,00015,750,000
Benefit Continuation (b)
47,59147,591
Restricted Shares (c)(d)
5,032,3999,268,7939,268,7939,268,793
Vested Stock Options (e)
8,472,0648,472,0648,472,0648,472,0648,472,0648,472,064
Vested Deferred Compensation Balance (f)
6,066,2516,066,2516,066,2516,066,2516,066,2516,066,2516,066,251
Total​$14,538,315$32,218,305$6,066,251$23,807,108$23,807,108$14,538,315$39,604,699
(a)
In the case of termination without cause by Company, the amount represents a payment equal to two times the sum of (a) annual base salary for 2023 and (b) target cash bonus for 2023. For change in control termination without cause, the amount represents a payment equal to two and a half times the sum of (a) annual base salary for 2023 and (b) target cash bonus for 2023.
(b)
Represents employer cost of medical, dental, and vision coverage for a period of twenty-four months should Mr. Snowden elect COBRA coverage for these benefits based on his benefit elections in place on December 31, 2023.
(c)
Restricted stock award values were computed based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 29, 2023 ($26.02 per share), which was the last trading day of 2023.
(d)
Restrictions on unvested awards lapse upon death, disability or a change in control termination without cause.
(e)
Amounts represent the difference between the exercise price of Mr. Snowden’s options and the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 29, 2023 ($26.02 per share), which was the last trading day of 2023. Vested stock options issued under the 2008 Plan, 2018 Plan and 2022 Plan are cancelled when an executive is terminated for cause by the Company.
(f)
Company contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan vest 20% per year during the first five years of service. However, vesting is accelerated upon death, retirement, change in control or, at the option of the committee administering the Deferred Compensation Plan, involuntary termination.
Post-Employment Payments—Felicia Hendrix
EXECUTIVE PAYMENTS
VOLUNTARY
TERMINATION BY
EXECUTIVE ($)
TERMINATION
WITHOUT
CAUSE BY
COMPANY ($)
TERMINATION
FOR CAUSE BY
COMPANY ($)
TERMINATION
UPON
DEATH ($)
TERMINATION
UPON
DISABILITY ($)
CHANGE IN
CONTROL ($)
CHANGE IN
CONTROL
TERMINATION
WITHOUT
CAUSE ($)
Cash Severance Benefit (a)
2,975,0003,400,000
Restricted Shares (b)(c)
1,018,8132,031,7202,031,7202,031,720
Vested Deferred Compensation Balance (d)
558,629558,629558,629643,712558,629643,712643,712
Total​$558,629$4,552,442$558,629$2,675,432$2,590,349$643,712$6,075,432
(a)
In the case of termination without cause by the Company, the amount represents a payment equal to the sum of (a) twenty four months of annual base salary for 2023 and (b) one and a half times the target cash bonus for 2023. For change in control termination without cause, the amount represents a payment equal to two times the sum of (a) annual base salary for 2023 and (b) target cash bonus for 2023. Represents employer cost of medical, dental and vision coverage for a period of twenty four months should the Ms. Hendrix elect COBRA coverage for these benefits based on her benefit elections in place on December 31, 2023.
(b)
Restricted stock award values were computed based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 29, 2023 ($26.02 per share), which was the last trading day of 2023.
(c)
Restrictions on unvested awards lapse upon death, disability or a change in control termination without cause.
(d)
Company contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan vest 20% per year during the first five years of service. However, vesting is accelerated upon death, retirement, change in control or, at the option of the committee administering the Deferred Compensation Plan, involuntary termination.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 75
COMPENSATION TABLES AND ARRANGEMENTS
Post-Employment Payments—Todd George
EXECUTIVE PAYMENTS
VOLUNTARY
TERMINATION BY
EXECUTIVE ($)
TERMINATION
WITHOUT
CAUSE BY
COMPANY ($)
TERMINATION
FOR CAUSE
BY COMPANY ($)
TERMINATION
UPON
DEATH ($)
TERMINATION
UPON
DISABILITY ($)
CHANGE IN
CONTROL ($)
CHANGE IN
CONTROL
TERMINATION
WITHOUT
CAUSE ($)
Cash Severance Benefit (a)
3,325,0003,800,000
Benefit Continuation (b)
50,30950,309
Restricted Shares (c)(d)
1,138,7132,271,0512,271,0512,271,051
Vested Stock Options (e)
230,974230,974230,974230,974230,974230,974
Vested Deferred Compensation Balance (f)
4,307,7804,307,7804,307,7804,307,7804,307,7804,307,7804,307,780
Total​$4,538,754$9,052,776$4,307,780$6,809,805$6,809,805$4,538,754$10,660,114
(a)
In the case of termination without cause by the Company, the amount represents a payment equal to the sum of (a) two times annual base salary for 2023 and (b) one and one half times the target cash bonus for 2023. For change in control termination without cause, the amount represents a payment equal to two times the sum of (a) annual base salary for 2023 and (b) target cash bonus for 2023.
(b)
Represents employer cost of medical, dental and vision coverage for a period of twenty four months should Mr. George elect COBRA coverage for these benefits based on his benefit elections in place on December 31, 2023.
(c)
Restricted stock award values were computed based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 29, 2023 ($26.02 per share), which was the last trading day of 2023.
(d)
Restrictions on unvested awards lapse upon death, disability or a change in control termination without cause.
(e)
Amounts represent the difference between the exercise price of Mr. George’s options and the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 29, 2023 ($26.02 per share), which was the last trading day of 2023. Vested stock options issued under the 2008 Plan, 2018 Plan and 2022 Plan are cancelled when an executive is terminated for cause by the Company.
(f)
Company contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan vest 20% per year during the first five years of service. However, vesting is accelerated upon death, retirement, change in control or, at the option of the committee administering the Deferred Compensation Plan, involuntary termination.
Post-Employment Payments—Chris Rogers
EXECUTIVE PAYMENTS
VOLUNTARY
TERMINATION BY
EXECUTIVE ($)
TERMINATION
WITHOUT
CAUSE BY
COMPANY ($)
TERMINATION
FOR CAUSE
BY COMPANY ($)
TERMINATION
UPON
DEATH ($)
TERMINATION
UPON
DISABILITY ($)
CHANGE IN
CONTROL ($)
CHANGE IN
CONTROL
TERMINATION
WITHOUT
CAUSE ($)
Cash Severance Benefit (a)
2,143,3162,900,000
Benefit Continuation (b)
33,38033,380
Restricted Shares (c)(d)
781,7191,430,0071,430,0071,430,007
Vested Stock Options (e)
243,907243,907243,907243,907243,907243,907
Vested Deferred Compensation Balance (f)
1,338,4501,338,4501,338,4501,338,4501,338,4501,338,4501,338,450
Total​$1,582,357$4,540,772$1,338,450$3,012,364$3,012,364$1,582,357$5,945,744
(a)
In the case of termination without cause by the Company, the amount represents a payment equal to the sum of (a) eighteen months of annual base salary for 2023 and (b) one and a half times the average of the last two full year’s bonuses paid. For change in control termination without cause, the amount represents a payment equal to two times the sum of (a) annual base salary for 2023 and (b) target cash bonus for 2023.
(b)
Represents employer cost of medical, dental and vision coverage for a period of eighteen months should Mr. Rogers elect COBRA coverage for these benefits based on his benefit elections in place on December 31, 2023.
(c)
Restricted stock award values were computed based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 29, 2023 ($26.02 per share), which was the last trading day of 2023.
(d)
Restrictions on unvested awards lapse upon death, disability or a change in control termination without cause.
(e)
Amounts represent the difference between the exercise price Mr. Rogers’ options and the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 29, 2023 ($26.02 per share), which was the last trading day of 2023. Vested stock options issued under the 2008 Plan, 2018 Plan and 2022 Plan are cancelled when an executive is terminated for cause by the Company.
(f)
Company contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan vest 20% per year during the first five years of service. However, vesting is accelerated upon death, retirement, change in control or, at the option of the committee administering the Deferred Compensation Plan, involuntary termination.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

76 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
COMPENSATION TABLES AND ARRANGEMENTS
Employment, Retirement and Separation Agreements
The Company has entered into employment, retirement and separation agreements with its executive officers, including Messrs. Snowden, George and Rogers and Ms. Hendrix. None of the employment agreements contain single trigger change in control. The Company determined to enter into these agreements in recognition of the continuing need to attract and retain experienced, proven executives (particularly in light of the increased competition for talent in its industry) and to protect the Company from certain competitive risk. The Compensation Committee plans to continue to evaluate whether and in what form to utilize severance or employment agreements in the future. For key employees with whom the Company does not seek to have severance or employment agreements, the Company has designed other policies and programs for attracting and retaining talented individuals.
Summary of Key Terms
The summary below reflects the Executive Agreements entered into between the Company and Messrs. Snowden and George as of November 2, 2022, Mr. Rogers as of March 10, 2022, and Ms. Hendrix as of February 19, 2024.
Term. The term of each employment agreement is for three years. Messrs. Snowden’s and George’s employment agreements expires on January 1, 2026, Ms. Hendrix’s employment agreement expires on January 1, 2027, and Mr. Rogers ‘ employment agreement expires on June 30, 2025. The Company believes that the length of each employment term represents a reasonable period for which the Company and the executive will mutually commit to maintaining the employment relationship. For the executive, this provides a reasonable but limited assurance of job security designed to foster an environment of entrepreneurial risk taking where the executive can focus on building long-term shareholder value.
Termination and Restrictive Covenants. The Company offers certain additional payments to its executive officers if the Company elects to terminate the executive’s employment without “cause.” Such termination payments are not available to the executive if the executive resigns (unless such executive has good reason) or if the executive is terminated for “cause.” All termination payments are expressly conditioned on the executive providing a written charterrelease of all liabilities to the Company and the executive’s agreement to comply with the restrictive covenants described below for the time period for which such payments are made.
Each employment agreement contains a comprehensive set of restrictive covenants designed to provide the Company with a reasonable degree of protection with regards to its strategic plans, intellectual property and human capital. Generally, each employment agreement contains prohibitions on (i) competition with the Company within 150 miles of any facility in which the Company or its affiliates owns or operates or is actively seeking to own or operate a facility for a period of twelve months following termination if terminated for “cause” or for the duration of the applicable Severance Period, as defined below, if terminated without “cause” or, in the case of Messrs. Snowden and George and Ms. Hendrix, by the executive for “good reason”, (ii) solicitation of any person who is, or was within a six month period prior to such solicitation, an executive or management (or higher) level employee of the Company or any of its affiliates for a period of 18 months following termination, and (iii) disclosure and use of any of the Company’s confidential information. The Board selected the time periods for which each executive is bound by these restrictive covenants based on its determination about the extent to which such individual’s tenure and knowledge of the Company could be used to adversely impact the Company’s strategic plans, intellectual property or human capital.
For all executives except Mr. Rogers, the additional payments following termination without “cause” or by the executive for “good reason” consist of a cash payment equal to (i) in the case of Mr. George and Ms. Hendrix, 2 multiplied by the sum of base salary plus 1.5 multiplied by the target bonus on the date of termination, and, in the case of Mr. Snowden, 2 multiplied by the sum of base salary plus the target bonus on the date of termination, plus (ii) an annual bonus based on actual performance for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, pro-rated to cover the portion of the fiscal year through the termination date.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 77
COMPENSATION TABLES AND ARRANGEMENTS
Summary of Key Terms (cont.)
The additional payments following termination without “cause” for Mr. Rogers consist of a cash payment equal to (i) eighteen (18) months of the greater of Mr. Rogers’ base salary in effect as of the termination date, paid in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll procedures, plus (ii) 1.5 multiplied by the average of the last two full year bonuses, paid at the time such bonuses are paid to similarly situated employees.
The amounts were selected based on the rationale that the Company was willing to continue to pay each executive an amount reflecting the foregone compensation over the period that the Company desired the executive to remain subject to the restrictive covenants. In addition, the Company will reimburse the executive for the full cost of purchasing COBRA health insurance coverage during the Severance Period, if applicable.
Change in Control. The Company has a “double trigger” change in control provision in its severance and employment agreements.
For Messrs. Snowden and George and Ms. Hendrix, in the event of a termination by the Company without cause or the named executive officer resigns for good reason within 24 months following a change in control, each executive is entitled to receive a cash payment equal to (i) in the case of Mr. George and Ms. Hendrix, 2, and, in the case of Mr. Snowden, 2.5, multiplied by the sum of (a) his or her base salary and (b) the amount of his targeted bonus compensation, each at a rate in effect at the time of the change in control or the termination date, whichever is greater, plus (ii) an annual bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, pro-rated to cover the portion of the fiscal year through the termination date based on the greater of the target bonus in effect at the time of the change in control or the termination date.
For Mr. Rogers, in the event that the Company announces that it has signed a definitive agreement with respect to a change of control or any potential acquirer has publicly announced its intent to consummate a change of control with respect to the Company, and if, during the period after the public announcement and immediately preceding the date such transaction is consummated or terminated, the Company terminates employment without cause, Mr. Rogers will be entitled to a lump sum equal to the excess, if any of (i) two times the targeted amount of annual cash bonus at the rate in effect on the termination date, over (ii) 1.5 multiplied by the average of the last two full years bonuses paid based on the actual performance of the Company. Furthermore, in the event of a termination by the Company without cause or the named executive officer resigns for good reason within 12 months following a change in control, Mr. Rogers is entitled to receive a cash payment equal to two times the sum of (i) his base salary and (ii) the amount of his targeted bonus compensation, each at a rate in effect at the time of the change in control or the termination date, whichever is greater.
To the extent that an executive receives a change in control payment, such executive will not be eligible to receive any additional cash severance in the event of a termination of employment during the employment term. The Company’s employment agreements do not provide for tax indemnification if a change in control or termination payment results in a parachute excise tax.
Each of the named executive officer’s annual compensation is reviewed annually and established by the Compensation Committee as described on page 33. For purposes of the potential termination and change in control payments described in this Proxy Statement, the terms set forth below have the meanings ascribed to them:
“Change in Control” – a “change in control” is defined as the occurrence of one or more of the following events: (i) a person, entity or group becomes the beneficial owner of shares representing 50% or more of (a) the Company’s outstanding shares or (b) the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote in the election of directors, except when such beneficial ownership is due to an acquisition directly from or by the Company or a Company employee benefit plan or pursuant to a consolidation, merger or share exchange reorganization between the Company and another entity described below; (ii) the shareholders of the Company approve any plan or proposal for the complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company; (iii) the Company consummates a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or the acquisition of assets of another entity, unless, following such transaction,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

78 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
COMPENSATION TABLES AND ARRANGEMENTS
Summary of Key Terms (cont.)
(a) all or substantially all of the beneficial owners immediately prior to such transaction still beneficially own more than 50% of the Company’s outstanding shares, (b) no person beneficially owns 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding shares who did not own such amount prior to the transaction and (c) at least a majority of the directors are continuing directors; or (iv) any time continuing directors do not constitute a majority of the Board.
“Good Reason” – an executive officer has “good reason” if (a) such officer is assigned to duties inconsistent with his position or authority, (b) such officer’s compensation is reduced or there is a substantial reduction in benefits taken as a whole, (c) such officer’s travel requirements are materially increased, (d) such officer is required to relocate or (e) such officer’s employment agreement is materially breached by the Company.
“Cause” – the Company has “cause” if the executive officer (a) is convicted of a felony or any misdemeanor involving allegations of fraud, dishonesty or physical harm, (b) is found disqualified or not suitable to hold a casino or other gaming license by a governmental gaming authority in any jurisdiction where such executive is required to be found qualified, suitable or licensed, (c) materially breaches the employment or severance agreement or any material Company policy, (d) misappropriates corporate funds as determined in good faith by the Audit Committee of the Board, (e) is determined by the Company to have failed to perform his or her duties with the Company or repeated insubordination or (f) is determined by the Company to have willfully engaged in illegal conduct or gross misconduct which is materially injurious to the Company or one of its affiliates.
“Severance Period” – in the case of Mr. Rogers, means eighteen (18) months following the date of separation from service, and, in the case of all other executives, means twenty-four (24) months following the date of separation from service.
CEO Pay Ratio
Pursuant to SEC rules, we are required to disclose in this Proxy Statement the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Snowden, our Chief Executive Officer and President, to the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees (excluding Mr. Snowden). We determined that Mr. Snowden’s 2023 annual total compensation was $15,542,305, the median of the 2023 annual total compensation of all of our employees (excluding Mr. Snowden) was $38,332, and the ratio of these amounts was 405 to 1. The Company believes that the foregoing ratio is a reasonable estimate determined in accordance with SEC rules.
Under the SEC rules, companies may identify the median annual total compensation using a wide variety of methods including reasonable assumptions and estimations. It is therefore difficult to compare our ratio to the ratio of other companies. We identified our median employee using payroll compensation consistent with what is reported on each employee’s W-2, Box 1 or equivalent taxable wages as of October 31, 2023 for all individuals, excluding our Chief Executive Officer and President, who were employed by us on such date. We measured total annual compensation based on all pay periods between November 1, 2022 and October 31, 2023. We did not make any assumptions or estimates with respect to total annual compensation. As of October 31, 2023, we had a total of 23,718 employees, excluding our Chief Executive Officer. We did not exclude any of our non-U.S. employees from this determination. We selected the median employee from that group for purposes of preparing the ratio of Chief Executive Officer pay to median employee pay. We then calculated the compensation for our median employee based upon the same components of compensation used to determine Mr. Snowden’s pay for purposes of Summary Compensation Table disclosure.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 79
COMPENSATION TABLES AND ARRANGEMENTS
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes certain information with respect to the Company’s compensation plans and individual compensation arrangements under which the Company’s equity securities have been authorized for issuance as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023:
PLAN CATEGORY(A)(B)(C)
NUMBER OF SECURITIES TO BE
ISSUED UPON EXERCISE OF
OUTSTANDING OPTIONS,
WARRANTS AND RIGHTS
WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE
PRICE OF OUTSTANDING
OPTIONS, WARRANTS
AND RIGHTS ($)
NUMBER OF SECURITIES REMAINING
AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE ISSUANCE UNDER
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS (EXCLUDING
SECURITIES REFLECTED IN COLUMN (A))
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders​3,475,403$30.18
11,008,469(1)(2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders (3)
234,781$14.40251,825
(1)
Includes 954,135 shares issuable at maximum in connection with performance-based restricted stock awards granted under performance-based equity plans adopted under the 2022 Plan; 600,000 stock settled restricted stock units and 300,000 restricted stock awards with market-based and service-based vesting conditions solely to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and 236,212 stock settled restricted units with performance-based vesting conditions that are dependent on the achievement of certain milestones. The weighted-average exercise price in column (b) does not take these awards into account.
(2)
The 2022 Plan provides that, while awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights, and awards of restricted stock, or shares issued pursuant to any other full value awards are counted as one share of common stock granted under such plan, for purposes of determining the number of shares available for issuance under such plan. Awards that are settled in cash rather than shares of stock are not counted against the limit in the 2022 Plan.
(3)
In connection with our October 19, 2021 acquisition of theScore, we assumed the Score Media and Gaming Inc. Second Amended and Restated Stock Option and Restricted Stock Unit Plan (the “Score Media Plan”). Upon the assumption of the Score Media Plan, the remaining share reserve thereunder was converted into a share reserve relating to shares of Company common stock based on the equity award exchange ratio applicable to outstanding equity awards of theScore. The Score Media Plan was approved by the Score Media and Gaming Inc. security holders prior to the acquisition but has not been approved by our shareholders. The Score Media Plan permits grants of stock options and restricted share units to directors, officers, employees of theScore at the time of the acquisition (“eligible persons”) (or wholly-owned corporations of such eligible persons). No future awards will be granted under the Score Media Plan.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

80 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
Pay Versus Performance
As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and certain financial performance of the Company. For further information concerning the Company’s variable pay-for-performance philosophy and how the Company’s aligns executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 48.
VALUE OF INTIAL $100
INVESTMENT BASED ON:
FISCAL YEAR
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION
TABLE TOTAL
FOR PEO 1
COMPENSATION
ACTUALLY PAID
TO PEO2
AVERAGE SUMMARY
COMPENSATION
TABLE TOTAL
FOR NON-PEO NEOS3
AVERAGE
COMPENSATION
ACTUALLY PAID
TO NON-PEO NEOS4
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDER
RETURN5
PEER GROUP
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDER
RETURN6
NET
INCOME ($M)7
ADJUSTED
EBITDAR ($M)8
2023$15,542,305$10,187,197$3,800,856$3,866,865$101.80$104.27($491.4)$1,512.6
2022$14,075,614($10,073,072)$3,105,185$1,412,413$116.20$82.85$221.7$1,939.4
2021$65,887,214$7,961,396$3,440,477$2,027,447$202.86$110.71$420.5$1,994.4
2020$3,898,655$75,499,569$3,232,591$13,492,467$337.91$112.34($669.1)$1,094.8
1
The dollar amounts reported are the amounts of total compensation reported for Mr. Snowden (our Principal Executive Officer) for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table. Refer to “Executive Compensation—Compensation Tables and Arrangements—2023 Summary Compensation Table.”
2
The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of “compensation actually paid” to Mr. Snowden, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to Mr. Snowden during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following “Compensation Actually Paid Calculation” table displays the adjustments made to Mr. Snowden’s total compensation for each year to determine the compensation actually paid.
3
The dollar amounts reported represent the average of the amounts reported for the Company’s named executive officers (NEOs) as a group (excluding Mr. Snowden) in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. The names of each of the NEOs (excluding Mr. Snowden) included for purposes of calculating the average amounts in each applicable year are as follows: (i) for 2022 and 2023, Felicia Hendrix, Todd George and Chris Rogers; (ii) for 2021, Felicia Hendrix, Todd George and Harper Ko; and (iii) for 2020, David Williams, William J. Fair and Carl Sottosanti.
4
The dollar amounts reported represent the average amount of “compensation actually paid” to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Snowden), as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or paid to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Snowden) during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following “Compensation Actually Paid Calculation” table displays the adjustments made to average total compensation for the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Snowden) for each year to determine the average compensation actually paid to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Snowden).
5
Cumulative TSR is calculated by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and the difference between the Company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by the Company’s share price at the beginning of the measurement period.
6
Represents the weighted peer group TSR, weighted according to the respective companies’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The peer group used for this purpose is the following published industry index: Russell 3000 Casino and Gambling Index.
7
The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of net income (loss) reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable year.
8
The Company believes Adjusted EBITDAR is the financial performance measure most closely linked to the calculation of compensation actually paid. Adjusted EBITDAR is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a definition and reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, see the section entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on pages 43 - 45 of our 2023 Annual Report.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 81
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
Compensation Actually Paid Calculation
PEONEO AVERAGE
20232022202120202023202220212020
Summary Compensation Table Total$15,542,305$14,075,614$65,887,214$3,898,655$3,800,856$3,105,185$3,440,477$3,232,591
Less: Reported Fair Value of Equity Awards(a)
$8,953,479$6,961,325$57,104,584$2,431,391$2,045,705$1,470,912$1,645,208$1,699,259
Add: Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards(b)
$9,604,572$5,919,253$22,335,085$3,668,075$2,302,218$1,016,402$1,231,271$5,549,713
Add: Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards(b)
($4,077,352)($18,419,902)($20,839,582)$64,271,366($271,763)($ 1,066,153)($1,020,003)$6,437,966
Add: Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Year(b)
Add: Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year(b)
($1,928,849)($4,686,713)($ 2,316,737)$6,092,864$81,259($ 172,109)$20,909​($28,544)
Less: Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Year(b)
Add: Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation(b)
Compensation Actually Paid(c)
$10,187,197($10,073,072)$7,961,396$75,499,569$3,866,865$1,412,413$2,027,447$13,492,467
(a)
The grant date fair value of equity awards represents the total of the amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year.
(b)
The equity award adjustments for each applicable year include the addition (or subtraction, as applicable) of the following: (i) the year-end fair value of any equity awards granted in the applicable year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the year; (ii) the amount of change as of the end of the applicable year (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value of any awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the applicable year; (iii) for awards that are granted and vest in the same applicable year, the fair value as of the vesting date; (iv) for awards granted in prior years that vest in the applicable year, the amount equal to the change as of the vesting date (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value; and (v) for awards granted in prior years that are determined to fail to meet the applicable vesting conditions during the applicable year, a deduction for the amount equal to the fair value at the end of the prior fiscal year. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant.
(c)
The Company does not maintain any defined benefit pension programs for its executives.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

82 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
Financial Performance Measures
As described in greater detail in “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a variable pay-for-performance philosophy. The measures that the Company uses for both our long-term and short-term incentive awards are selected based on the objective of incentivizing our NEOs to increase the value of our enterprise for our shareholders. We believe Adjusted EBITDAR is the most meaningful critical indicator of the Company’s growth and financial health. Therefore, as described above, Adjusted EBITDAR is a key component of our incentive plan design. Because the other important metrics that the Company considers are operationally-based and in furtherance of our long-term strategy (e.g. omnichannel, Interactive and ESG goals), Adjusted EBITDAR is the only financial measure used to link “compensation actually paid” to our NEOs to company performance for the most recently completed fiscal year.
Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay versus Performance Table
While the Company utilizes several non-financial performance measures to align executive compensation with Company performance, all of those Company measures are not presented in the Pay versus Performance table. Moreover, the Company generally seeks to incentivize long- term performance, and therefore does not specifically align the Company’s performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K) for a particular year. In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the Company is providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the Pay versus Performance table.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 83
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
Compensation Actually Paid and Cumulative TSR
As demonstrated by the following graph, the amount of compensation actually paid to Mr. Snowden and the average amount of compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Snowden) is aligned with the Company’s cumulative TSR over the four years presented in the table. The alignment of compensation actually paid with the Company’s cumulative TSR over the period presented is because a significant portion of the compensation actually paid to Mr. Snowden and to the other NEOs is comprised of equity awards. As described in more detail in the section “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” in 2023, 90% of our Chief Executive Officer’s total target compensation, and 80% (on average) of our other NEOs’ total target compensation was variable and at risk, subject to achievement of pre-set performance goals or tied to our long-term stock price performance.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

84 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income
As demonstrated by the following table, the amount of compensation actually paid to Mr. Snowden and the average amount of compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Snowden) is generally aligned with the Company’s net income as presented in the table. While the Company does not use net income as a performance measure in the overall executive compensation program, the measure of net income is correlated with the measure Adjusted EBITDAR, which the company does use for when setting goals in the Company’s STIP and LTIP. As described in more detail in the section “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” in 2023, 90% of our Chief Executive Officer’s total target compensation, and 80% (on average) of our other NEOs’ total target compensation was variable and at risk, subject to achievement of pre-set performance goals or tied to our long-term stock price performance.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 85
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
Compensation Actually Paid and Adjusted EBITDAR
As demonstrated by the following graph, the amount of compensation actually paid to Mr. Snowden and the average amount of compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Snowden) is generally aligned with the Company’s Adjusted EBITDAR. While the Company uses numerous measures, both financial and non-financial, for the purpose of evaluating performance for the Company’s compensation programs, the Company has determined that Adjusted EBITDAR is the financial performance measure that, in the Company’s assessment, represents the most important performance measure (that is not otherwise required to be disclosed in the table) used by the Company to link compensation actually paid to the company’s NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to Company performance. The Company utilizes Adjusted EBITDAR when setting goals for the Company’s annual incentives to the NEOs under the Company’s incentive plan.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

86 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
Cumulative TSR of the Company and Cumulative TSR of the Peer Group
As demonstrated by the following graph, the Company’s cumulative TSR over the four-year period presented in the table was 1.8%, while the cumulative TSR of the peer group presented for this purpose over the same four-year period, the Russell 3000 Casino & Gambling Index, was 4.27%. For more information regarding the Company’s performance and the companies that the Compensation Committee considers when determining compensation, refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” starting on page 48.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 87
PROPOSAL 3:
ADVISORY VOTE
TO APPROVE THE
COMPENSATION OF NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Introduction
We are asking shareholders to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers as reported in this Proxy Statement (commonly referred to as “say-on-pay”).
We encourage shareholders to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) section of this Proxy Statement, which describes how our executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed to achieve our compensation objectives, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables and narrative, which provide detailed information on the compensation of our named executive officers. We believe shareholders should approve the Company’s compensation program because it is appropriate in the context of industry standards and is heavily weighted towards performance-based compensation that aligns executive compensation with the long-term strategic plans of the Company and shareholder interests. As more specifically described in the CD&A, the Committee believes the 2023 compensation paid to Mr. Snowden, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, is reasonable and appropriate in light of the Company’s scale, objectives, achievements and performance.
The Board has adopted a policy providing for an annual say-on-pay advisory vote. In accordance with this policy and Section 14A of the Exchange Act and as a matter of good corporate governance, we are asking shareholders to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of the Company approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the accompanying narrative disclosure included in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.”
This advisory say-on-pay resolution is non-binding on the Board of Directors. Although non-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding our executive compensation program. Unless the Board modifies its policy on the frequency of future say-on-pay advisory votes, the next say-on-pay advisory vote will be held at the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

88 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Vote Required
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is required for approval (on a non-binding, advisory basis) of this proposal. For purposes of the vote on this proposal, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote, although they will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.
Board
Recommendation

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 89
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
Audit Committee Report




Jane Scaccetti
Chair
Barbara Shattuck Kohn
Member
Saul Reibstein
Member
The following is a report by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors regarding the responsibilities and functions of the Audit Committee. This report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed filed with the SEC, and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of the Company’s filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, respectively, whether made before or after the date of this Proxy Statement and irrespective of any general incorporation language therein.
Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles, internal controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards, applicable laws and regulations. The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, compensating, overseeing and, where appropriate, discharging and replacing the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (the “independent accounting firm”). In addition, the Audit Committee is involved in the selection of the lead audit engagement partner whenever a rotational change is required by applicable law or listing standards or for any other reason. The independent accounting firm is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, the independent accounting firm will express its own opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring and overseeing these processes.
The function of the Audit Committee is not intended to duplicate or attest as to the activities of management and the independent accounting firm, nor can the Audit Committee certify that the independent accounting firm is “independent” under applicable rules. The Audit Committee serves a board-level oversight role, in which it provides advice, counsel and direction to management and the independent accounting firm based on the information it receives, discussions with management and the independent accounting firm and the experience of the Audit Committee’s members in business, financial and accounting matters.
In this context, the Audit Committee met and held numerous discussions with management and the independent accounting firm during 2023. Management represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and the independent accounting firm. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent accounting firm matters required to be discussed by the applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
The independent accounting firm also provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by Rule 3526 of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Communications with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with the independent accounting firm the firm’s independence.
Based upon the Audit Committee’s discussion with management and the independent accounting firm and the Audit Committee’s review of the representations of management and the report of the independent accounting firm on the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board of Directors that is reviewed annually and compliesinclude the audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s 2023 Annual Report filed with the NASDAQ RulesSEC on February 22, 2024.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

90 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
A description of aggregate fees for professional services performed by Deloitte, which served as our independent public accounting firm for fiscal 2023 and 2022, is as follows:
FEESFISCAL 2023FISCAL 2022
Audit Fees (1)
$7,339,971$7,059,221
Audit-Related Fees (2)
Tax Fees (3)
$20,000$20,000
Other Fees (4)
$18,290
$18,290
Total Fees$7,378,261$7,097,511
(1)
Audit fees include fees associated with the annual audit, reviews of the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, annual audits required by law for certain jurisdictions, and other audit and attestation services related to statutory or regulatory filings. Audit fees also include the audit of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. Audit fees included additional fees associated with registration statement on Forms S-3 and S-8, comfort letters and consents.
(2)
There were no audit-related fees in 2023 or 2022.
(3)
Tax fees for 2023 and 2022 included advisory services.
(4)
Other fees for 2023 and 2022 included fees to the Canadian Public Accountability Board.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures of our Audit Committee
Our Audit Committee must pre-approve all audit services and permissible tax and non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. In the intervals between the scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee delegates pre-approval authority of permissible tax and non-audit services to the chair of the Audit Committee or a subcommittee thereof. The chair must report any such pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 91
OTHER MATTERS
Annual Report
The Company’s 2023 Annual Report is being made available to shareholders concurrently with this Proxy Statement and does not form part of the proxy solicitation material.
Changing the Way You Receive Proxy Materials in the Future
Instead of receiving a Notice of Availability in the mail for future meetings, shareholders may elect to receive links to proxy materials by e-mail or to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials and a paper Proxy Card by mail. Opting to receive all future proxy materials online will save us the cost of producing and mailing such documents to you and help us conserve natural resources. If you elect to receive proxy materials by e-mail, you will not receive a Notice of Availability in the mail. Instead, you will receive an e-mail with links to proxy materials and online voting. In addition, if you later elect to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials, or if applicable rules or regulations require paper delivery of the proxy materials, you will not receive a Notice of Availability in the mail. If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials or the Notice of Availability in the mail, you could eliminate all such paper mailings in the future by electing to receive an e-mail that will provide Internet links to these documents. You can change your election by directing your request in writing to PENN Entertainment, Inc., 825 Berkshire Boulevard, Suite 200, Wyomissing, Pennsylvania 19610, Attention: Secretary, or by sending a blank e-mail with the 16-digit control number on your Notice of Availability to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com, via the Internet at www.proxyvote.com, or by telephone at 1-800-579-1639. Your election will remain in effect until you change it.
Householding of Proxy Materials
Registered and “street-name” shareholders who reside at a single address receive only one annual report and proxy statement at that address unless a shareholder provides contrary instructions. This practice is known as “householding” and is availabledesigned to reduce duplicate printing and postage costs. However, if a shareholder wishes in the future to receive a separate annual report or proxy statement, he or she may contact Broadridge Financial Solutions atwww.pngaming.com/About.

        The Nominating 1-866-540-7095, or in writing at Broadridge Financial Solutions, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. In any event, if you did not receive an individual copy of this Proxy Statement or our 2023 Annual Report, we will send a copy to you promptly if you address your written request to the Secretary, PENN Entertainment, Inc., 825 Berkshire Boulevard, Suite 200, Wyomissing, Pennsylvania 19610. Shareholders can request householding if they receive multiple copies of the annual report and Corporate Governance Committeeproxy statement by contacting Broadridge Financial Solutions at the address above.

Advance Notice Provision
Under the Company’s bylaws, no business may be brought before an annual meeting unless it is responsible for:

    reviewing and making recommendations onspecified in the eligibility criteria for individual Board and committee membership, includingnotice of the range of skills and expertise, diversity, and independence that should be represented onmeeting or is otherwise brought before the Board and its committees;

    reviewing and recommendingmeeting by or at the appropriate structure, composition and sizedirection of the Board or by a shareholder present in person at the meeting who (i) was a shareholder of record at the time of giving notice and, its committees;

    identifyingat the time of the annual meeting is entitled to vote at the meeting, and recommending,(ii) has owned beneficially at least 1% of the Company’s common stock for a continuous period of not less than 12 months prior to making the proposal and who has delivered proper written notice to the Company’s Secretary (containing certain information specified in the bylaws about the shareholder and the proposed action) not less than 120 nor more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. Accordingly, proposals with respect to the 2025 annual meeting of shareholders must be delivered between January 7, 2025 and February 6, 2025. These requirements are separate from the SEC’s requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a shareholder proposal included in the Company’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act. In addition, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19(b).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

92 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
OTHER MATTERS
Shareholder Proposals under Rule 14a-8
Shareholders interested in submitting a proposal for inclusion in the proxy materials for the Board's selection, nomineesannual meeting of shareholders in 2025 may do so by following the procedures prescribed in Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act. To be eligible for electioninclusion, shareholder proposals must be received by the Company’s Secretary no later than December 24, 2024. Proposals should be sent to the Board; and

overseeing the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines and other corporate governance practices, including reviewing and recommendingCompany’s principal executive office, 825 Berkshire Boulevard, Suite 200, Wyomissing, Pennsylvania 19610, directed to the Board for approval any new or revised guidelines, documents or policies that comprise the Company's corporate governance framework.

        The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has a long-standing practice of including on the Board a complementary mix of individuals with diverse backgrounds and skills reflectiveattention of the varied challenges facingSecretary.

Director Nominations by Shareholders
Shareholders present in person at the Company's management as it strives to continue to generate increased shareholder value. Overmeeting who (i) were shareholders of record at the last three years,time of giving notice and, at the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has recommended, and the Board has approved, the addition of three talented new directors who have brought valuable diversity of experience and views to the Board.


Table of Contents

Compliance Committee

        Ronald J. Naples and Harold Cramer are the Board memberstime of the Compliance Committee and Steve DuCharme and Thomas N. Auriemmaannual meeting are the non-director members of the Compliance Committee. The members of the Compliance Committee are individuals who, by virtue of their familiarity with law enforcement, regulated businesses, the business activities of the Company or gaming control, are sensitiveentitled to the concerns of the gaming regulation authorities and are capable of ensuring compliance or determining the existence or likelihood of a violation of a law, rule, regulation, policy or procedure applicable to the Company. Steve DuCharme, Chairman of the Committee, is a former Chairman of the Nevada State Gaming Control Board with over 30 years of experience in law enforcement and gaming regulation. Thomas N. Auriemma is the Company's former Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer and former Director of the Division of Gaming Enforcement in New Jersey, with over 30 years of experience as a gaming regulator in the State of New Jersey. The Compliance Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The Chief Compliance Officer reports to the Compliance Committee, and other executives of the Company (including the General Counsel, the Chief Operating Officer and the Vice President, Internal Audit) regularly attend meetings of the Compliance Committee,vote at the committee's invitation, to ensure the committee has ready access to first-hand knowledgemeeting, and to encourage pervasive compliance culture throughout the Company.

        The Compliance Committee was established to foster, through self-regulatory policies and procedures, compliance with applicable laws relating to the Company's gaming and racing businesses and to prevent, to the fullest extent possible, any involvement by the Company in any activities that could pose a threat to the reputation and integrity of the Company's gaming and racing operations.

        The Compliance Committee is responsible for:

    reviewing and assessing the adequacy of the Company's compliance policies, procedures and systems designed to sufficiently identify serious compliance issues;

    reviewing and assessing the effectiveness of the Company's compliance efforts, particularly the training on and implementation of procedures;

    monitoring audits and investigations conducted or overseen by the Company's compliance personnel;

    monitoring third party investigations of and disciplinary actions against the Company; and

    reporting to the Board any matters of concern regarding the Company's compliance with various laws and regulations.

        In discharging its oversight role, the Compliance Committee is empowered to investigate any matter brought to its attention and may engage, at the expense of the Company, independent counsel or other advisors as it deems necessary to carry out its duties.

Director Selection Process

        The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers candidates for Board membership suggested by, among others, its members, other Board members and management. The committee will also consider recommendations of nominees for directors by shareholders (for information relating to the nominations of directors by our shareholders, please see "Director Nominations by Shareholders" below). In addition, the committee has authority to engage a search firm to assist in the identification of director candidates, to approve the search firm fees (which are paid by the Company) and other retention terms, and to obtain advice and assistance from internal and


Table of Contents

external legal, accounting or other advisors. In selecting nominees for director, the committee considers a number of factors, including, but not limited to:

    whether a candidate has demonstrated business and industry experience that is relevant to the Company, including recent experience at the senior management level (preferably as chief executive officer or a similar position) of a company as large or larger than the Company;

    a candidate's ability to meet the suitability standards set forth in the Company's bylaws, as well as the rigorous suitability, investigations and filing requirements of the relevant regulatory agencies in each of the many jurisdictions where the Company operates;

    a candidate's ability to effectively represent the interests of the shareholders;

    a candidate's diversity of experience and independence from management and freedom from potential conflicts of interest with the Company;

    a candidate's financial literacy, including whether the candidate can meet the audit committee membership standards set forth in the NASDAQ Rules and SEC rules;

    whether a candidate is recognized for his or her reputation, integrity, judgment, skill, leadership ability, honesty and moral values;

    a candidate's ability to work constructively with the Company's management and other directors; and

    a candidate's capacity, taking into consideration the number of other boards on which the candidate serves, to dedicate sufficient time and energy to his or her board and committee duties.

        During the process of considering a potential nominee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and its Company delegates generally request extensive additional information about, and conduct interviews with, the potential nominee. The information expected to be provided includes detailed financial and personal history customarily required by the Company's gaming and racing regulators. In addition, the committee will also request that the candidate submit to an investigation overseen by the Chief Compliance Officer to evaluate whether the candidate is suitable to serve on the Board of a publicly traded, multi-jurisdictional, highly regulated gaming and racing company.

Director Nominations by Shareholders

        Shareholders(ii) who have beneficially owned at least 1% of the Company'sCompany’s common stock for a continuous period of not less than 12 months before making such recommendation may submit director nominations to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration. To be timely, a shareholder'sshareholder’s notice to the Secretary must be hand-deliveredhand delivered to or mailed (certified or registered mail, return receipt requested) and received by the Company Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Company not less than 120 nor more than 150 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders.

To be in proper written form, a shareholder'sshareholder’s notice must contain with respect to each nominee: (i) all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filing required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of directors in a contested election, or otherwise required by Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; (ii) a description of all direct and indirect compensation, economic interests and other material monetary agreements, arrangements and understandings during the past three years between or among such shareholder and beneficial owner, if any, and their respective affiliates and associates; (iii) a description of all relationships, agreements, arrangements and understandings between the proposed nominee and the recommending shareholder and the beneficial owner, if any; (iv) a description of all relationships between the recommended nominee and any of the


Table of Contents

Company's Company’s competitors, customers, suppliers, labor unions or other related parties; and (v) a completed and signed questionnaire, representations, consent and agreement as required by the Company'sCompany’s bylaws.

A shareholder'sshareholder’s notice must also contain certain other information regarding the shareholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the recommendation for nomination or proposal is made, including: (i) the name, address and telephone number of such shareholder and the name, address and telephone number of such beneficial owner, if any; (ii) the class or series and number of shares and any other securities of the Company which are owned of record by such shareholder and beneficially by such beneficial owner, and the time period such shares have been held; (iii) any material pending or threatened legal proceeding in which such shareholder or beneficial owner is a party or material participant involving the Company or any of its officers or directors, or any affiliate of the Company, and any direct or indirect material interest in any material contract or agreement of such shareholder or beneficial owner with the Company, any affiliate of the Company or any principal competitor of the Company; (iv) a representation that such shareholder and beneficial owner, if any, intend to be present in person at the meeting; (v) a representation that such shareholder and such beneficial owner, if any, intend to continue to hold the reported securities through the date of the Company'sCompany’s next annual meeting of shareholders; and (vi) a completed and signed questionnaire, representations, consent and agreement as required by Company'sthe Company’s bylaws.

The notice shall be accompanied by a written consent of each recommended nominee to provide (i) all information necessary to enable the Company to respond fully to any suitability inquiry conducted under the executive, administrative, judicial and/or legislative rules, regulations, laws and orders of any jurisdiction to which the Company is then subject; (ii) a multijurisdictionalmulti-jurisdictional personal disclosure form in the form customarily submitted by officers and directors of the Company; (iii) such additional information concerning the recommended nominee as may reasonably be required by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and/or Board to determine the eligibility of such recommended nominee to serve as an independent director of the Company, that could be material to a reasonable shareholder'sshareholder’s understanding of the independence, or lack thereof, of such proposed nominee, and to evaluate whether the recommended nominee is an unsuitable person; and (iv) a background check to confirm the qualifications and character of the recommended nominee, to evaluate whether the nominee is an unsuitable person, and to make such other determinations as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or the Board may deem appropriate or necessary.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 93
OTHER MATTERS
Director Nominations by Shareholders (cont.)
Section 4.02(a) of the Company’s bylaws also includes director qualification requirements relating to suitability with respect to licensure and related gaming regulatory matters.
The foregoing is a brief summary of the requirements to properly nominate an individual for election to the Board. For further information regarding director nominations by shareholders, please see Article VII and Section 4.02(a) of the Company'sCompany’s bylaws.

Other Matters to Come Before the 2024 Annual Meeting

Compensation of Directors

        The Company pays director fees to each director who is not an employee of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2015, each non-employee director received an annual cash fee of $50,000, plus an additional $10,000 for service on each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Compliance Committee, as applicable. On January 30, 2015, each director on such date also received an annual award of phantom stock units equal to 18,208 shares, other than Mr. Carlino, who received an annual award of phantom stock units equal to 27,312 shares in recognition of his service as Chairman of the Board. The number of phantom stock units awarded to the directors was determined based on the closing price of the Company's stock on December 31, 2014 ($13.73) in order to approximate a value of $250,000 per director (or $375,000, in the case of Mr. Carlino). Following her appointment to the Board, Ms. Scaccetti received an initial award of phantom stock units equal to 15,924 shares on April 17, 2015, which was based on the closing price of the Company's stock on April 16, 2015 ($15.70). Each award vests in four equal annual installments from the date of grant.


Table of Contents

2015 Director Compensation Table

        The following table sets forth information with respect to all compensation awarded to the Company's non-employee directors during the last completed fiscal year and currently outstanding.

    Current Year Compensation  Outstanding 
  Name  Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash



 
 Stock
Awards
($)(1)


 
 Total ($)  Stock
Ticker

 
 Stock Awards
(2)

 
  Peter M. Carlino   50,000   426,340   476,340   PENN   508,601  
                  GLPI   3,003,841  
  Harold Cramer   80,000   284,227   364,227   PENN   35,478  
                  GLPI   5,263  
  David A. Handler   60,000   284,227   344,227   PENN   35,478  
                  GLPI   5,263  
  John M. Jacquemin   60,000   284,227   344,227   PENN   35,478  
                  GLPI   5,263  
  Barbara Shattuck Kohn   70,000   284,227   354,227   PENN   35,478  
                  GLPI   5,263  
  Ronald J. Naples   60,000   284,227   344,227   PENN   32,560  
                  GLPI   1,595  
  Jane Scaccetti   60,000   250,006   310,006   PENN   15,924  

(1)
The amounts listed above are calculated based on the closing price on the day prior to grant date.

(2)
Stock awards represent phantom stock unit awards outstanding as of December 31, 2015. Stock awards outstanding include outstanding phantom stock unit awards in GLPI received by non-employee directors on a one-time basis as part of the Spin-Off, as more particularly described on page 33 of this Proxy Statement. Mr. Carlino's outstanding stock awards include 87,986 phantom stock units and 420,615 options in the Company and 53,069 restricted stock awards, 51,608 phantom stock units and 2,899,164 options in GLPI (which include shares and options received pursuant to an exchange transaction entered into with the Company prior to the Spin-Off but does not include awards received as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of GLPI).

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors

        TheOur Board of Directors has established stock ownership guidelinesdoes not know of any matters other than those described in this Proxy Statement that will be presented for non-employee directorsaction at the Annual Meeting. If other matters are presented, proxies will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the Company. Each non-employee director is expected to own and hold shares of common stock, including restricted stock and phantom stock units, equal in value to at least five times the annual cash retainer (exclusive of separate committee retainers) for non-employee directors in the applicable year. New non-employee directors have a period of three years from the date of initial election to achieve this ownership guideline. As of December 31, 2015, all non-employee directors who have served on the Board for at least three years were in compliance with these guidelines.

proxy holders.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

94 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
ABOUT THE MEETING: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Why Am I Receiving This Proxy Statement?

Shareholder Access Policy

        Shareholders who wish to communicate with directors should do so by writing to Penn National Gaming, Inc., 825 Berkshire Boulevard, Suite 200, Wyomissing, PA 19610, Attention: Secretary. The Secretary of the Company reviews all such correspondence and forwards to the Board a summary of all such correspondence and copies of all correspondence that,This Proxy Statement is furnished in the opinion of the Secretary, dealsconnection with the functionssolicitation of the Board or Board committees or that he otherwise determines requires their attention. Directors may at any time review a log of all correspondence received by the Company that is addressed to members of the Board and request copies of any such correspondence. Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters will be brought to the attention of the Audit Committee.


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL NO. 1

ELECTION OF CLASS II DIRECTORS

Information about Nominees and Other Directors

        The Board of Directors currently consists of eight members: Peter M. Carlino (Chairman), Harold Cramer, David A. Handler, John M. Jacquemin, Barbara Shattuck Kohn, Jane Scaccetti, Ronald J. Naples and Timothy J. Wilmott. The directors are organized into three classes, with each class elected to serve a three year term. Two Class II directors will be electedproxies for use at the Annual Meeting to hold office, subject to the provisions of the Company's bylaws, until the annual meeting of shareholders of the Company to be held in 2019 and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.

Class II Nominees

        The following table sets forth the name, age, independence status, number of other public company boards, principal occupation and respective service dates of each person who has been nominated to be a director of the Company. Each nominee has consented to be named as a nominee and, to the knowledge of the Company, is willing to serve as a director, if elected. Should either of the nominees not remain a nominee at the end of the meeting (a situation which is not anticipated), solicited proxies may be voted by the holders of the proxies for a substitute nominee (unless a proxy contains instructions to the contrary).

 

 





Name of Nominee






 



Age





 



Independence





 No. of
Other
Public
Company
Boards





 



Principal Occupation





 


Director
Since





 

Term
(if
elected)





 

 

Barbara Shattuck Kohn

   65   Yes   None   Principal, Hammond Hanlon Camp LLC   2004   2019  

 

 

Ronald J. Naples

   70   Yes   1   Director of P.H. Glatfelter Company, Glenmede Trust Company and the Philadelphia Contributionship   2013   2019  

Nominee Qualifications

        Barbara Shattuck Kohn.    Ms. Shattuck Kohn has been a director since 2004 and is a Principal at Hammond Hanlon Camp LLC, a strategic advisory and investment banking firm. Prior to joining Hammond Hanlon Camp LLC in 2012, Ms. Shattuck Kohn was a Managing Director of Morgan Keegan—Raymond James. Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. was acquired by Raymond James Financial from Regions Financial Corp. and was the successor to Shattuck Hammond Partners, an investment banking firm Ms. Shattuck Kohn co-founded in 1993. Prior to 1993, she spent 11 years at Cain Brothers, Shattuck & Company, Inc., an investment banking firm she also co-founded. From 1976 to 1982, she was a Vice President of Goldman, Sachs & Co. Ms. Shattuck Kohn began her career as a municipal bond analyst at Standard & Poor's Corporation.

        The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommended the nomination of Ms. Kohn, and the Board supports and approves such nomination, because of her substantial experience in investment banking, capital markets and project finance. Further, she possesses the experience, financial sophistication and financial statement expertise necessary to evaluate potential acquisition and financing opportunities for the Company, and she was instrumental in evaluating both the preferred equity investmentpurposes stated in the Company by Fortress Investment Group, LLC in 2008 and the Spin-Off in 2013. This financial background is ideally suited for Ms. Kohn's service on the Audit and Compensation Committees, and her reputation, integrity, judgment and proven leadership ability meets both the Board's high standards and the rigorous requirementsaccompanying Notice of the various regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over the Company.


Table of Contents

        Ronald J. Naples.    Mr. Naples has been a director since June 2013. Mr. Naples also serves as a director of P.H. Glatfelter Company, Glenmede Trust Company and the Philadelphia Contributionship. Mr. Naples served as Chairman of the Pennsylvania Stimulus Oversight Commission and Chief Accountability Officer for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, having been appointed to that position by the Governor of Pennsylvania, from April 2009 until February 2011. From 1997 until May 2009, Mr. Naples was the Chairman of Quaker Chemical Corporation, a public specialty chemical company serving the metalworking and manufacturing industries worldwide, and served as Quaker's Chief Executive Officer from 1995 to 2008. Previously, Mr. Naples was Chairman and Chief Executive of Hunt Manufacturing Company, a public company, from 1981 to 1995.

        The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommended the nomination of Mr. Naples, and the Board supports and approves such nomination, because of his significant business experience as a chief executive officer and director of large, publicly traded corporations, his significant government and regulatory experience as Chairman of the Pennsylvania Stimulus Oversight Commission and Chief Accountability Officer for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, his impressive educational background and distinguished military career as well as his reputation, integrity, judgment and proven leadership ability that meets both the Board's high standards and the rigorous requirements of the various regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over the Company. In addition, Mr. Naples' military, leadership and regulated company experience is invaluable in the context of his service on the Compliance Committee.

        In addition to the qualifications of each nominee for director described above, Barbara Shattuck Kohn and Ronald J. Naples are standing for re-election based upon the judgment, financial acumen and skill they have previously demonstrated as Board members, as well as their demonstrated commitment to serve on the Board.

Continuing Directors

        The following table sets forth the name, age, independence status, number of other public company boards, principal occupation and respective service dates of each person who will continue as a director after the Annual Meeting.

 

 





Name






 



Age





 



Independence





 No. of
Other
Public
Company
Boards





 



Principal Occupation





 


Director
Since





 


Term
Expires





 

 

Class I Directors:

                          

 

 

David A. Handler

   51   Yes   1   Partner, Centerview Partners   1994   2018  

 

 

John M. Jacquemin

   69   Yes   None   President, Mooring Financial Corporation   1995   2018  

 

 

Class III Directors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

Peter M. Carlino

   69   No   1   CEO of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.   1994   2017  

 

 

Harold Cramer

   88   Yes   None   Retired Partner, Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP; Retired Chairman and CEO of the Graduate Health System   1994   2017  

 

 

Jane Scaccetti

   62   Yes   1   CEO of Drucker & Scaccetti, P.C.   2015   2017  

 

 

Timothy J. Wilmott

   57   No   None   President and CEO of Penn National Gaming, Inc.   2014   2017  

Table of Contents

        David A. Handler.    Mr. Handler has been a director since 1994. In August 2008, Mr. Handler joined Centerview Partners as a Partner. Centerview Partners is an independent financial advisory and private equity firm. From April 2006 to August 2008, he was a Managing Director at UBS Investment Bank. In November 2013, Mr. Handler became a director of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.

        The Board supported and approved the nomination of Mr. Handler in 2015 because of his investment banking and capital markets experience, which includes a focus on mergers and acquisitions and other significant transactions, which complements his long-term exposure to the gaming industry. Mr. Handler's background has been an invaluable asset to the Company over the years, particularly in connection with evaluating potential acquisition and financing opportunities.

        John M. Jacquemin.    Mr. Jacquemin has been a director since 1995. Mr. Jacquemin is President of Mooring Financial Corporation, a group of financial services companies founded by Mr. Jacquemin in 1982 that specializes in the purchase and administration of commercial loan portfolios.

        The Board supported and approved the nomination of Mr. Jacquemin in 2015 because of his experience with private equity funds specializing in restructurings, workouts and the valuation of distressed debt. The nature of these investments requires an intimate and sophisticated understanding of financial statements to enable the identification of growth opportunities in troubled companies, as well as valuation expertise. This experience brings unique perspective to the Board and is enhanced by Mr. Jacquemin's financial sophistication and financial statement expertise and long-term exposure to the gaming industry.

        Peter M. Carlino.    Mr. Carlino has served as the Company's Chairman of the Board since April 1994 and served as the Company's Chief Executive Officer from 1994 until the Spin-Off on November 1, 2013, when he assumed the role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GLPI. Since 1976, he has also been President of Carlino Capital Management Corp., a holding company that owns and operates Carlino family businesses and oversees its investments, in which capacity he has been continuously active in strategic planning and operations monitoring.

        The Board supported and approved the nomination of Mr. Carlino in 2014 because he was the driving force behind the growth of long-term shareholder value since the Company's initial public offering in 1994 until the Spin-Off. The Company's growth and shareholder value appreciation over this period is largely due to Mr. Carlino's vision and leadership, which has enabled the Company to identify and pursue the development opportunities and to build the management team that have been the basis of the Company's long-term growth. Moreover, as one of the largest beneficial owners of the Company's common stock, his interests are uniquely and significantly aligned with the Company's efforts to continue to grow long-term shareholder value.

        Harold Cramer.    Mr. Cramer has been a director since 1994. Until November 1996, Mr. Cramer was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Graduate Health System. From November 1996 to July 2000, Mr. Cramer was Counsel to Mesirov Gelman Jaffe Cramer & Jamieson, LLP, which merged with Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP in July 2000. Mr. Cramer is now a retired partner of Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP.

        The Board supported and approved the nomination of Mr. Cramer in 2014 because of his extensive experience building and managing a law firm and serving as chief executive officer of a large health care provider, which included several hospitals in two states, a health maintenance organization and a captive insurance company, among other entities. His legal and business background provides the Board and the Company with a critical understanding of the issues from a variety of perspectives—legal, business and regulatory—affecting the Company.

        Timothy J Wilmott.    Mr. Wilmott has been a director since 2014. Mr. Wilmott joined the Company in February 2008 as President and Chief Operating Officer and was named Chief Executive Officer in November 2013. Mr. Wilmott served at Harrah's Entertainment (now Caesars Entertainment


Table of Contents

Corporation) from 1987 to 2008 and was Chief Operating Officer at Harrah's for approximately four years. In this position, he oversaw the operations of all of Harrah's revenue-generating businesses, including 48 casinos, 38,000 hotel rooms and 300 restaurants.

        The Board appointed Mr. Wilmott as a director in 2014 because of the perspectives and experience he brings as the Company's Chief Executive Officer and his success in leading the operations of the Company, including his commitment to diversifying its operations in a manner focused on returns while fostering its employees' commitment to deliver quality guest services across the property portfolio.

        Jane Scaccetti.    Ms. Scaccetti became a director in 2015. Ms. Scaccetti is the Chief Executive Officer of Drucker & Scaccetti, P.C., a public accounting and business advisory firm, of which she has been a principal since 1990. Ms. Scaccetti also serves as a director of Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.; trustee of Temple University; Chair of the Board of Temple University Hospital; and a trustee of Salus University. In addition, Ms. Scaccetti served as a director of The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack from 2002 until 2016; and of Nutrition Management Services Company from 1992 until 2010.

        The Board appointed Ms. Scaccetti as a director in 2015 because of her financial expertise as a practicing CPA since 1977, as well as her management expertise as chief executive officer and as a director of other publicly traded companies. Her experience brings unique perspective to the Board and the Board is enhanced by Ms. Scaccetti's financial sophistication and expertise.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that the shareholders vote "FOR" each of the nominees.


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL NO. 2

RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS
THE COMPANY'S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2016

        The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016, and the shareholders are being asked to ratify this selection. Ernst & Young LLP has served as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm since 2006. All audit and non-audit services provided by Ernst & Young LLP are approved by the Audit Committee. Ernst & Young LLP has advised the Company that it has no direct or material indirect interest in the Company or its affiliates. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to attend the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions. The favorable vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the ratification of the selection of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm.

        A description of aggregate fees for professional services performed by Ernst & Young LLP in fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 is as follows:

 

 

  
Fiscal 2015

 
Fiscal 2014

 

 Audit Fees(1)   $4,332,287   $3,708,655  

 

 

Audit-Related Fees(2)

    135,000    40,000  

 

 Tax Fees(3)    325,614    248,553  

 

 

    Total Fees

   $4,792,901   $3,997,208  

(1)
Audit fees include fees associated with the annual audit, reviews of the Company's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, annual audits required by law for certain jurisdictions, comfort letters, consents and other audit and attestation services related to statutory or regulatory filings. Audit fees also include the audit of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Audit fees also include approximately $400,000 of additional fees related to incremental work associated with the Company's 2015 acquisitions.

(2)
Audit-related fees include fees for the audit of the Company's 401(k) plan, as well as due diligence costs related to the Prairie State Gaming acquisition.

(3)
Tax fees include fees for property tax consultations.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

        The Audit Committee's Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy provides for the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services performed by the Company's independent registered public accounting firm. Under the policy, the Audit Committee may pre-approve specific services, including fee levels, by the independent registered public accounting firm in a designated category (audit, audit related, tax services and all other services). The Audit Committee may delegate, in writing, this authority to one or more of its members, provided that the member or members to whom such authority is delegated must report their decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. In 2015, all of the services provided by Ernst & Young LLP were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote "FOR" the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL NO. 3

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE COMPENSATION PAID TO
THE COMPANY'S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

        The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the "Dodd-Frank Act") and Section 14A of the Exchange Act require public companies to give their shareholders the opportunity to cast advisory votes relating to the compensation paid to the Company's Named Executive Officers. Accordingly, we are providing shareholders the opportunity to approve, on an advisory basis, determinations made by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors regarding the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as such compensation is described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, and the subsequent tabular and narrative disclosure beginning on page 28 of this Proxy Statement (the "CD&A"). We currently conduct this advisory vote on an annual basis. We are requesting your nonbinding vote on the following resolution:

        "RESOLVED, that the shareholders of the Company approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the accompanying narrative disclosure included in the Company's proxy statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders."

        We believe shareholders should approve of the Company's compensation program because it This solicitation is appropriate in the context of industry standards and is heavily weighted towards performance-based compensation that align executive compensation with shareholder interests. As more specifically described in the CD&A, the Compensation Committee believes the compensation paid to Mr. Wilmott, the Company's Chief Executive Officer, is reasonable and appropriate in light of the Company's scale, objectives, achievements and performance.

        We urge you to carefully review the CD&A so that you have a complete understanding of how important our compensation program is to the continued success of the Company. You will find in the CD&A a detailed discussion of the Company's pay-for-performance compensation philosophy, the elementsmade by PENN Entertainment on behalf of our compensation program and the specific payments made to Named Executive Officers with respect to 2015. The Company's compensation program is fundamental to the approach we employ to attract, motivate and, most importantly, retain our Named Executive Officers. To that end, we believe we have designed a compensation program that is strongly grounded on pay-for-performance principles, and which features a significant amount of "at risk" compensation, as described in more detail in the CD&A. In addition, we have carefully tailored the executive compensation program in light of the Company's post-Spin-Off profile, which has resulted in a reduction to the Company's executive compensation levels from pre-Spin-Off levels, as more fully described in CD&A.

        We believe that the Company's stock performance amply supports the compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers. As highlighted in the chart below, an investment of $100 in the Company made on January 1, 2006 would have been worth $215.08 as of the close of business on December 31, 2015 (as adjusted to reflect the Spin-Off) versus an average of $63.48 for the same investment in our peer group companies with comparable trading histories. In addition, an investment in the Company's shares would have provided an approximately 6.25% higher return than an investment in the S&P 500 index over this period.


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

 
 12/31/2005 12/31/2006 12/31/2007 12/31/2008 12/31/2009 12/31/2010 12/31/2011 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 

Penn National Gaming, Inc. 

 $100.00 $126.31 $180.73 $64.89 $82.52 $106.68 $115.54 $149.04 $192.39 $184.34 $215.08 

S&P 500

 $100.00 $115.80 $122.16 $76.96 $97.33 $111.99 $114.35 $132.66 $175.62 $199.66 $202.42 

Peer Group

 $100.00 $137.21 $172.17 $29.32 $24.73 $38.65 $26.89 $30.62 $59.26 $54.68 $63.48 

(1)
Total shareholder return is based on a $100 investment on January 1, 2006 in the applicable stock or index (based on the closing prices on December 31, 2005). The return is determined assuming quarterly investment of dividends and, in the case of the Company, reflects the effect of the Spin-Off as described on page 33 of this Proxy Statement. The shareholder return for the Company does not reflect the performance of GLPI (other than the one-time cash and stock dividend of $11.84 related to its Earnings and Profits purge made in connection with its election to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (the "Purge")), including the quarterly dividends paid by GLPI following the Spin-Off.

(2)
The peer group shown here is the same peer group used for compensation comparison purposes, as described on page 29 of this Proxy Statement, except that Caesars Entertainment Corporation, Las Vegas Sands Corp. and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. are excluded because they do not have comparable investment focus or stock trading histories during the relevant periods. As a result, the peer group shown here consists of Boyd Gaming Corporation, Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., MGM Resorts International and Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.

        As an advisory vote, the results of this vote will not be binding on the Board or the Company. However, we urge you to endorse our pay-for-performance compensation program, particularly in light of the Company's strong performance and significant achievements over both the short-term and long-term.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders cast their advisory vote "FOR" approval of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and as otherwise disclosed in this Proxy Statement.


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

For purposes of the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the terms "Committee," "we" or "our" refer to the Compensation Committee of the Board.

Executive Compensation Highlights

        Our compensation program:

    Includes a mix of fixed and variable pay designed to create sustainable long-term value for our shareholders;

    Defers a significant portion of variable pay as equity-based awards, encouraging both shareholder alignment and retention;

    Includes both long-term and short-term components;

    Focuses on "at risk" compensation, with 75% of our CEO's total compensation at risk;

    Benchmarks compensation at the median of our peer group;

    Reflects a reduction of 53.3% in overall target compensation for our top three executives compared to 2013; and

    Beginning in 2016, implements performance-based vesting for a meaningful portion of equity awards for 12 of the Company's senior executives, with each grant not fully vesting until the third anniversary of the grant.

Key Features of our Executive Compensation Program

What We Do

What We Don't Do

üPay for Performance – Our program focuses on "at risk" compensation in order to better align performance with compensation values earnedýNo Single Trigger Change in Control – Our employment agreements contain only double trigger change in control provisions
üPerformance-Based Vesting – We implemented performance-based vesting for awards granted for 2016ýNo Tax Gross-Ups – Our employment agreements do not contain tax indemnification provisions
üMultiple Performance Metrics – Incentive compensation is tied to both short- and long-term measures to encourage balanced incentivesýNo Hedging or Pledging – Hedging and pledging of the Company's stock is prohibited
üShare Ownership Guidelines – All directors and named executive officers exceed the Company's recently increased and significant stock ownership requirementsýNo Supplemental Retirement Plans – We do not have any defined benefit pension programs or other supplemental executive retirement plans
üClawback Policy – Our policy provides for the recovery of compensation in certain circumstancesýNo Excessive Perquisites – Our executive officers have very limited perquisites
üConfidentiality & Non-Competition Agreements – All executive officers are subject to confidentiality and non-compete agreementsýNo Discounting or Repricing of Options – We prohibit discounting or repricing options and restrict margin lending
üEquity Awards – Adopted policy in 2015 to ensure the consistency and efficiency of the Company's equity award processýNo Liberal Share Counting – The Company prohibits "liberal share counting" under the Company's equity plans

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

        The Company's strong 2015 financial results highlight the value of our strategies to grow market share and enhance operating efficiencies at our existing properties while pursuing growth and return focused expansion initiatives. From a financial perspective, the Company's revenues in 2015 increased 9.6%, which contributed to a 52.1% rise in our cash flow from operations and continued improvement to the bottom line.Directors. This performance was driven by the opening of Plainridge Park Casino, Massachusetts' first commercial gaming facility in June 2015, as well as the Company's improved performance in many of our markets.

        With our vision for continued near- and long-term growth and commitment to enhancing shareholder value, the Company also completed several other strategic initiatives in 2015, including the acquisition of Tropicana Las Vegas and the establishment of new business lines to support our interactive gaming strategy and Prairie State Gaming, our newly acquired Illinois video gaming terminal operator. The Tropicana Las Vegas acquisition fulfills our longstanding goal of acquiring the right property on the Las Vegas Strip to leverage our database of almost 3 million regional gaming customers.

        Reflecting these achievements, the Company's share price appreciated by nearly 17% in 2015, to $16.02 at year-end. We believe the Company remains favorably positioned for continued growth in 2016 and beyond, based on our disciplined management of existing properties and expanded contributions from Plainridge Park Casino, Tropicana Las Vegas and Prairie State Gaming, as well as our management contract at Hollywood Casino Jamul-San Diego, which is expected to open mid-year 2016.

Company Stock Performance

        The Company's stock price during the year reflected the accomplishments described above, as the price rose from $13.73 to $16.02, an increase of nearly 17%. This performance exceeded our key benchmarks, including the S&P 500 index (–1%) and the weighted average return of our peer gaming operators, comprised of Boyd Gaming Corporation, Caesars Entertainment Corporation, Isle of Carpi Casinos, Inc., Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International, Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. and Wynn Resorts, Limited (–21.13%). In addition, the Company's stock has increased by an aggregate of 101.62% over the last five years, exceeding both the S&P 500 index (80.75%) and its peer group (20.93%).

GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

        The following table illustrates the significant value the Company has created over the last several years, both through the Spin-Off and the subsequent performance of the Company's stock. As shown below, from November 15, 2012 (the date on which the Spin-Off was initially announced), to December 31, 2015, the Company's adjusted stock price has risen from $8.50 to $16.02, an increase of over 88%. This stock price performance increased total shareholder equity value over this period by over $500 million.

Penn National Gaming, Inc.
Total Shareholder Return (1)
Measured from Pre-Spin-Off Announcement Through December 31, 2015

GRAPHIC


(1)
Total shareholder return reflects the effect of the Spin-Off as described on page 33 of this Proxy Statement. The shareholder return for the Company does not reflect the performance of GLPI, including the quarterly dividends paid by GLPI following the Spin-Off.

2015 Growth Initiatives





GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC
In August 2015, the Company closed on the acquisition of the iconic Tropicana Las Vegas on the Las Vegas Strip for $360 million.In June 2015, the Company opened the $250 million Plainridge Park Casino in Plainville, Massachusetts, the Commonwealth's first gaming facility.






GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC
In September 2015, the Company closed on the acquisition of Prairie State Gaming, one of the largest video gaming terminal operators in Illinois, with more than 1,100 terminals in 270 bars and retail gaming establishments.Throughout 2015, the Company continued development of the proposed $390 million Hollywood Casino-Jamul, just outside of San Diego County, California, which is currently anticipated to open in mid-2016.

Table of Contents

Reduction in Target Compensation Expense

        While the Company has created significant shareholder value over the past several years, it has also focused on managing compensation expense. In fact, target compensation to the Company's top executives has decreased dramatically since the Spin-Off. This decrease is illustrated by the following table, which shows the aggregate potential target compensation to the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer in 2013 compared to 2015, inclusive of base salary, annual target incentive bonuses and equity incentive compensation (assuming achievement of all nine targets under the 2013 external measure of the annual incentive compensation plan). As shown below, the total target compensation to the Company's top three officers was reduced from 2013 to 2015 by approximately $11.0 million, or 53.3%.

Total Target Compensation

GRAPHIC

Company Performance

        Significant achievements for 2015 include the following:

    Our share price appreciated by nearly 17% during the year, exceeding key benchmarks including the S&P 500 (–1%), while substantially outperforming our peer gaming companies identified on page 27 of this Proxy Statement (–21%).

    Our revenue increased 9.6%, which helped to increase cash flow from operations by 52% (to $399.0 million) and adjusted EBITDA by 12.2% (to $796.3 million), while net income increased from a prior year loss to positive net income of approximately $0.7 million.*

    We improved already strong adjusted EBITDA margins from 27.4% to 28.1% and operating margins from 9.9% to 16.5%, all in a highly competitive environment.*

    We benefited from a full year of operations of Hollywood Gaming at Dayton Raceway and Hollywood Gaming at Mahoning Valley Race Course, our two Ohio integrated racing and gaming facilities that opened in August and November 2014, respectively. Both properties are generating solid returns on invested capital following our involvement in permitting these racetracks to add gaming and relocating them from more competitive areas of the state.

    In June, we opened Plainridge Park Casino in Massachusetts. The property is generating a solid return on invested capital and opened several years before any of the other future Massachusetts facilities. Plainridge Park Casino is a wholly-owned asset of the Company, with no rental obligation.

    In August, we completed the financing and acquisition of the Tropicana Las Vegas, which fulfills our long-term strategic goal of obtaining a presence on the Las Vegas Strip to leverage our


*
See Reconciliations and Non-GAAP Financial Measures on page 43 of this of this Proxy Statement.

Table of Contents

    database of almost 3 million regional gaming customers. With a $360 million acquisition cost, 35 acres on the Las Vegas Strip, nearly 1,500 guest rooms including 181 suites (of which six are luxury villas) and recent property upgrades of approximately $200 million by the former owners, we believe we structured a prudent transaction to own and operate a premier Las Vegas Strip property at an attractive price of entry. Tropicana Las Vegas is a wholly-owned asset of the Company with no rental obligation, and the property site affords us significant opportunities for long-term development and growth.

    Also in August, in a transaction that was additive to our operating results immediately upon closing, we acquired Prairie State Gaming, one of the largest operators of video gaming terminals in Illinois, with more than 1,100 terminals in 270 bar and retail gaming establishments. With the Company's two decades of industry leading experience in marketing, player development and operating electronic casino games in highly regulated environments, the transaction leverages our core competencies and provides the Company with a solid platform for future growth in the Illinois market and potentially other states where this form of gaming is authorized or being considered.

    We continued to advance our initiatives in social and online gaming, which represent emerging growth platforms that complement our expanding regional gaming portfolio. In May 2015, the Company announced a strategic partnership with Scientific Games to create a Play 4 Fun web based and mobile app platform, branded as HollywoodCasino.com, which was subsequently marketed to our customers at certain regional gaming facilities. Since its launch, this offering is delivering enhanced customer database analytics and improved marketing capabilities. Reflecting this initial success, this offering has been rolled out across most of our Hollywood Casino properties as we seek to address the significant percentage of our database members that already participate in social and online gaming. Our continued focus on social and online gaming, combined with our growing skills in the interactive space are positioning us to participate in additional social and regulated real-money online opportunities as they develop.

    Throughout the year, we made significant progress to advance the development of a Hollywood Casino tribal gaming facility on the Jamul Indian Village's land in trust (near San Diego, California), which we will manage and brand upon its expected mid-2016 opening. The three-story gaming and entertainment facility – with the region's most convenient access to the local population – will include more than 1,700 slot machines, 43 live table games, a posh lounge featuring national and regional entertainment, a beer garden, a four-venue food court, and an eight-story partially subterranean parking garage with over 1,800 parking spaces.

        For a complete discussion of the Company's performance in 2015, please see Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on pages 43 to 78 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, a copy of which is included in the Annual Report to Shareholders delivered in connection with this Proxy Statement.


Table of Contents

Effect of the Spin-Off on Share Price and Compensation

        In connection with the Spin-Off, each shareholder of the Company received one share of common stock of GLPI for each share of common stock of the Company held by such shareholder. In addition, as contemplated prior to the Spin-Off, in February 2014, GLPI made a one-time cash and stock dividend to its shareholders relating to the Purge. As a result of these two events, as noted throughout the Proxy Statement, the Company's stock prices have been adjusted, where appropriate, using a constant adjustment factorenclosed Proxy Card and our 2023 Annual Report are first being mailed to reflect the effect of the Spin-Off and the Purge. In addition to the adjusted values reflectedshareholders beginning on or about April 23, 2024.

What Am I Being Asked To Vote On, And What Are The Board Of Directors’ Voting Recommendations?
PROPOSAL
BOARD VOTE
RECOMMENDATION
PAGE REFERENCE
Proposal 1: Election of Class I Directors

FOR each Nominee
Proposal 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

FOR
Proposal 3: Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of Named Executive Officers

FOR
Will Any Other Matters Be Voted On?
The proposals set forth in this Proxy Statement shareholders ofconstitute the Company who have retained their GLPI stock have been receiving recurring quarterly dividends from GLPI. In the Spin-Off, consistent with the treatment of all Company shareholders, the Company's directors and executives received a one-time equity allocation in GLPI based on their equity in the Company (as well as dividend payments with respect to their shares and unvested options in GLPI, all in accordance with the employee matters agreement between the Company and GLPI entered into in connection with the Spin-Off). As a result, this one-time GLPI equity allocation is reflected, where appropriate, in the equity compensation information in this Proxy Statement.

Key Compensation Practices

        The Committee, in consultation with the Consultant, management and the full Board, routinely considers compensation practices suggested by the Company's shareholders as a result of the Company's shareholder outreach efforts, as well as those identified as "best practices" by various market constituents. With all such suggestions, we strive to incorporate into our compensation program the practices we believe will most effectively support the Company's continuing efforts to create shareholder value. Over the last several years we have incorporated many of these practices into our compensation program, including:

    Utilizing a carefully tailored equity compensation program to incentivize our management team, while at the same time reducing the overall value of annual equity compensation awarded to employees in 2015 relative to pre-Spin-Off levels. This practice continues to address shareholder concerns regarding overhang and burn rate under the Company's 2008 Plan while maintaining alignment between shareholders and management.

    Beginning in 2016, implementing a performance share program that contains performance-based vesting for a meaningful portion of equity awards for 12 of the Company's top executives, with each grant not fully vesting until the third anniversary of the grant date.

    Creating a pay-for-performance environment by linking incentive-based compensation to the achievement of measurable and relevant performance metrics, including EBITDA and stock price performance.

    Eliminating employment agreements containing "single trigger" change in control provisions.

    Eliminating employment agreements containing tax indemnification (i.e., "golden parachute" gross-up) provisions.

    Implementing meaningful and recently increased share ownership guidelines for directors and executive officers.

    Adopting a clawback policy with respect to executive compensation.

    Limiting perquisites for executives.

    Not implementing defined benefit pension programs or other supplemental executive retirement plans for executives.

    Adjusting the Company's cash bonus program to increase the amount of compensation "at risk" to better align the Company's bonus structure with that of its peers and tailor the mix between

Table of Contents

      bonus awards and equity grants so that executives in positions that focus on operations are rewarded more through bonus awards that track operational results, while those in positions that focus on corporate strategy are rewarded more through equity grants.

    Recognizing individual contributions by linking compensation to the achievement of objectively measured individual goals.

    Eliminating block equity grants (i.e., awarding a fixed number of shares or options to each recipient each year) in favor of grants based on a percentage of salary and eliminating our previous external measure of the annual incentive plan in order to, among other things, more fairly allocate equity grants across the senior management team, better incentivize senior management and reduce the overall amount and expense associated with total targeted pay for our top executives.

    Granting equity-based awards that incorporate a fungible share feature applicable to all full value awards, which is based on the theory that a full value award is worth more than an award payable in shares in the form of a stock option or stock appreciation right. As such, the approved pool of equity available for equity-based awards is reduced to a greater extent by awards of full-value equity grants and is consistent with prevailing views of "best practices."

    Employing compensation programs that do not incentivize short-term results to the detriment of long-term goals or encourage excessive risk taking.

    Adopting an Equity-Based Award Policy in 2015 to ensure the consistency and efficiency of the Company's equity award process.

    Prohibiting the Company's directors and executive officers from engaging in hedging or pledging transactions involving Company shares.

    Prohibiting "liberal share counting" under the Company's equity plans.

    Prohibiting discounting and repricing options.

    Utilizing share repurchase programs (when appropriate) to capitalize on prudent stock repurchase opportunities that help offset the potential dilution from shares granted pursuant to incentive awards.

        We will continue to evaluate and consider input from our shareholders and emerging "best practices" to ensure that our compensation programs contain the features necessary to properly align the interests of our executives with the interests of our shareholders.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Senior Management

        The Compensation Committee has established stock ownership guidelines for senior management, which are re-evaluated periodically. In 2015 the ownership guidelines for our executive officers were increased to reflect the following requirements:

Position

Previous Ownership
Guidelines


Current Ownership
Guidelines


Chief Executive OfficerThree times base salaryFive times base salary
Chief Operating OfficerTwo times base salaryThree times base salary
Chief Financial OfficerTwo times base salaryThree times base salary
Chief Development OfficerOne times base salaryTwo times base salary
General CounselOne times base salaryTwo times base salary

Table of Contents

        The Chief Executive Officer is authorized to set ownership requirements for other members of the senior management team as appropriate. As with the director stock ownership guidelines, the value of a senior officer's stock ownership at any time will be based on the aggregate value of common stock, restricted stock and phantom stock units held by such senior officer. Each officer is required to achieve compliance with these guidelines within five years of assuming his or her current position and, once achieved, ownership of the required amount must be maintained for as long as the individual is subject to these guidelines. As of December 31, 2015, all Named Executive Officers (as defined on page 46 of this Proxy Statement) had achieved full compliance with this policy.

Shareholder Outreach and Say on Pay Vote

        We received over 77% support for our say on pay vote in 2015, following support of over 98% in 2014. We believe this change in support reflects potential misperceptions relating to the one-time equity awards made in 2014 under the Transition Award Program ("TAP"). Nevertheless, we believe that our shareholders recognize our commitment to incorporating "best practices" into our compensation program, as well as our sensitivity to shareholder views on compensation. During 2015, the Company continued its long-standing practice of robust communication and discussion with shareholders, including direct dialogue with most of its top 40 shareholders regarding executive compensation issues and corporate governance issues.

        By way of overview, the Company continues to hold quarterly conference calls in which management limits its prepared remarks in favor of creating an open forum to allow shareholders and analysts an opportunity to ask about matters of most interest to them. The Company employs an outside investor relations firm to facilitate the Company's frequent and comprehensive shareholder communications. For instance, the Company issued a total of 26 press releases throughout the year in order to keep investors informed of noteworthyonly business developments. The Company also continues to provide financial and other disclosure beyond that required by the SEC on matters such as management's views on industry trends, pending legislation and quarterly and annual earnings estimates. Further, members of the Company's senior management team maintained an active schedule of participation at institutional investor conferences, shareholder meetings and management staffed tours of our facilities throughout 2015. We also regularly host investor and analyst meetings at our corporate offices and arrange for investors and analysts to visit our facilities (before and after they open) and meet with local management. At the Global Gaming Expo, the gaming industry's annual trade show in Las Vegas, executives participated in a high number of investor events and conducted a large number of group meetings with analysts and investors and hosted an extremely well attended tour and information sessions with analysts and investors at the recently acquired Tropicana Las Vegas. These outreach efforts afford investors and prospective investors with constructive forums to discuss with management a wide variety of subjects important to them, including executive compensation, and provides useful feedback for management.

        We believe our discussions with investors in 2015 were especially important with regard to our compensation program. For instance, these conversations helped to resolve many of the misperceptions about awards made in 2014 under the TAP, as we were able to better articulate the rationale for the program and to reaffirm its one-time nature. These discussions also provided the Board with valuable insights on how to better develop and communicate new compensation programs in the future, if the need ever arises. Further, based in part on our dialogue with shareholders, the Company implemented a performance share program beginning in 2016 for 12 of the Company's top executives, which contains performance-based vesting for a meaningful portion of equity awards, with each grant not fully vesting until the third anniversary of the grant date.

        Another direct result of our shareholder engagement was the Board's determination to amend the Company's bylaws in December 2014 to eliminate a provision (sometimes referred to as a "golden


Table of Contents

leash") that generally prohibited an individual from qualifying for service as a director of the Company if he or she is a party to any compensatory or other financial arrangement with any third party in connection with his or her candidacy or service as a director of the Company. This action was taken following numerous discussions between the Company and certain of its shareholders as part of the Company's shareholder outreach efforts, after which the Board concluded it was in the interest of the Company and its shareholders to remove the provision from the bylaws.

Executive Compensation Benchmarking Peer Group

        We review the Company's peer group at the beginning of each year to determine whether any changes are warranted from the prior year's peer group. The companies that make up the Company's peer group are its business competitors as well as its primary source of, and primary competition for, executive talent. Many of the Company's executives have been recruited from these other gaming enterprises. In addition, since gaming and racing are highly specialized and regulated industries, it takes a high degree of experience and prior knowledge to provide effective oversight and guidance to multiple gaming and racing properties in a variety of jurisdictions. Also, the Company's executive officers are required to submit to extensive investigations conducted by the state police, or an equivalent investigatory agency, of their personal and family financial records, their character and their competency in order to be found "suitable" to serve in their respective capacities in each of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Accordingly, the pool for executives capable and willing to serve in an executive capacity in a publicly traded, multi-jurisdictional gaming and racing company tends to be limited, and in many cases consists mostly of individuals who are already working within the gaming industry and within our peer group. For these reasons, we have determined that the appropriate peer group for the Company consists of the most prominent companies in the commercial gaming industry. We believe that this peer group is appropriate for determining relative industry performance as well as for recruitment and retention purposes. Importantly, this decision was made in recognition of the fact that the Spin-Off (which had the effect of reducing the Company's market capitalization) did not materially alter the scale or complexity of the Company's businesses.

        For 2015, we confirmed that the peer group to be used for compensation comparison purposes would consist of Boyd Gaming Corporation, Caesars Entertainment Corporation, Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International, Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In addition, we take into consideration any available compensation data from Station Casinos, Inc., which was taken private, but continues to file periodic reports under the Exchange Act. For information regarding the peer group we use for shareholder return comparison purposes, please see page 27 of this Proxy Statement.

Overview of Compensation Program

Objectives of Compensation Program

        The overall objective of the Company's executive compensation program is to compensate members of management in a manner that most effectively incentivizes them to maximize shareholder value without taking undue financial risks. At the same time, the executive compensation program is intended to enable the Company to attract and retain the executive talent needed to grow and advance the strategic interests of an increasingly larger and more complex entity. In an environment where (i) the number of traditional gaming venues has grown exponentially in the U.S. and abroad over the last decade (increasing both the number of business competitors and competitors for talent, as well as reducing the potential upside from future domestic expansion), (ii) alternatives such as gaming REITs and spin-offs, as well as private equity investment, are continuing to proliferate and (iii) internet gaming, social gaming and fantasy sports are rapidly gaining in popularity, the competition for executive


Table of Contents

talent in our industry has grown sharply. These factors are specifically contemplated in the Company's compensation objectives, which are to:

    Align executive pay opportunities with shareholder value creation;

    Create a pay for performance compensation program that will appropriately reward management for operational and strategic development success; and

    Attract and retain the best possible management team for the Company to increase shareholder value and maintain the Company's credibility in the capital markets.

Reflecting the Company's long-term success in attracting and retaining the industry's best talent, the independent advisory groups, Bristol Associates and Spectrum Gaming Group, have recently named the Company the gaming industry's Employer of First Choice.

Compensation Philosophy

        To support the Company's compensation program objectives, we have adopted and annually review and confirm a compensation philosophy that serves as the guide for all executive compensation decisions. Our compensation philosophy is as follows:

            The Company intends to maintain an executive compensation program designed to attract and retain the executive talent needed to grow and further the strategic interests of the business. To this end, the Company offers a compensation and benefits program that will be sufficiently attractive to provide talented executives with good reason for joining and remaining with the Company and continuing in their efforts to improve shareholder value. The Company's program is designed to motivate and reward executives to achieve and exceed targeted results. Compensation received by the executives will be commensurate with the performance of the Company, prevailing market rates in the industry, and their own individual contributions by linking compensation to the achievement of objectively measured goals.

Risk Assessment

        In establishing and reviewing our executive compensation program, we consider, among other things, whether the program properly motivates executives to focus on the creation of shareholder value without encouraging unnecessary or excessive risk taking. As a result, the Committee carefully reviews the principal components of executive compensation. Base salaries are reviewed and set annually. Annual short-term incentive pay is focused on achievement of certain specific, readily quantifiable and tangible financial goals and is determined using multiple absolute and objective performance criteria, and in particular announced guidance pertaining to adjusted EBITDA targets. The other major component of our executive officers' compensation is long-term incentives through a mix (which may vary from year to year and by level) of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and phantom stock units that we believe are important to help further align executives' interests with those of our shareholders. Such grants are subject to long-term vesting schedules, and executives are subject to minimum stock ownership requirements, to help ensure that executives always have significant value tied to long-term stock price performance. We believe that these cash and incentive awards, especially when combined with the compensation clawback policy described on page 43 of this Proxy Statement, appropriately balance payment for performance and alignment of executive compensation with shareholders without encouraging unnecessary or excessive risk taking. Based on the Committee's review of the above factors, the Committee determined that the Company's compensation programs do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.


Table of Contents

Elements of Compensation

        We have designed a compensation program that is heavily weighted towards performance-based compensation, and which utilizes several different performance metrics designed to ensure that management is appropriately incentivized across a number of different business and economic environments, while also appropriately considering each of the principal objectives of the Company's business strategy. To that end, our compensation program is strongly grounded on pay-for-performance principles. As illustrated in the chart below, for example, in 2016 we expect target performance-based compensation (or "at risk" compensation), which includes stock options, other equity awards and EBITDA-based cash bonuses, for the Company's top three executives officers (the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer) to comprise 75% of target compensation. In addition, 30% of the equity awards to such officers are performance shares that are subject to performance-based vesting only upon the achievement of specified performance goals, with each grant not vesting until the end of three one year measurement periods.


Target 2016
Executive Compensation

GRAPHIC

        The principal elements of the compensation program are described below. Please see "Analysis of Compensation" starting on page 41 for a discussion of the specific actions taken with respect to executive compensation for fiscal year 2015. For a detailed description of the Committee's role and responsibilities, as well as the retention and use of the Consultant, please see "Compensation Committee" beginning on page 14 of this Proxy Statement.

        Base Salary.    The base salary of our executive officers as a group is benchmarked against the 50th percentile (median) of base salaries of comparable executives within the Company's peer group. We benchmark against the median in order to set salaries that are competitive in the gaming industry and that will attract and retain qualified executives. Base salaries are then adjusted for certain qualitative factors, including specific position duties and responsibilities, tenure with the Company, individual contribution and position value to the Company and the overall reasonableness of an executive's pay package.

        Annual Short-Term Incentive.    The annual target short-term incentive compensation of our executive officers as a group is benchmarked against the 50th percentile (median) of annual short-term incentive compensation of comparable executives within the Company's gaming peer group. The Company's annual short-term incentive plan is designed to motivate the executive officers and other members of management to achieve the Company's carefully crafted short-term operational objectives. To ensure that such executives are appropriately incentivized to maximize earnings for the Company, our annual short-term incentive plan in 2015 provided for the payment of incentive compensation based upon the Company's achievement of its adjusted EBITDA goal for the year.


Table of Contents

        The Committee believes that an annual incentive program that relies principally on adjusted EBITDA focuses our executives on the achievement of annual objectives that will most tangibly contribute to both short- and longer-term shareholder gains. The Committee also believes that the long-term incentive program establishes the appropriate linkage to shareholder value creation in a way that is more representative of standard gaming industry practice than the previous external measure of the annual incentive program, thereby eliminating design variances that could contribute to executive retention challenges at a time when the industry is facing real challenges.

        The term adjusted EBITDA refers to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, adjusted for certain non-recurring or unforeseen events. In order to provide a clear reconciliation to generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), we based our adjusted EBITDA calculation on the Company's income from operations excluding charges for stock compensation, depreciation, amortization, gain or loss on disposal of assets and other non-recurring events, such as impairment charges, and inclusive of gain or loss from the Company's joint ventures with our share of non-operating items (such as depreciation and amortization) added back for our joint venture in Kansas. We measure our annual short-term incentive plan based on adjusted EBITDA because it is an objective and quantifiable measurement for the Company's financial performance, as well as for comparing the Company's performance to others within the industry. Quite simply, it is both the most well-established way to gauge a gaming company's value over time and relative to its peers. Each quarter, the Company publicly discloses its adjusted EBITDA in connection with its quarterly announcement of earnings, and provides a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income (GAAP) and income from operations (GAAP) to adjusted EBITDA in connection with each such announcement. In addition, for transparency with investors, the Company provides a quarterly reconciliation of actual adjusted EBITDA to the Company's stated guidance targets. From time to time we made adjustments to the publicly reported adjusted EBITDA results for purposes of adjusted EBITDA used to determine the annual short-term incentive compensation in accordance with the terms of the 2008 Plan. These adjustments are made in connection with unanticipated, one-time and non-recurring events. We also include rent payments associated with our Master Lease agreement with GLPI in adjusted EBITDA for purposes of our annual short-term incentive compensation program. We have determined to use adjusted EBITDA as part of the annual short-term incentive plan calculation again in 2016.

        The target bonus is payable when the Company meets or exceeds its adjusted EBITDA goal for a given year, subject to any adjustments permitted under the 2008 Plan to account for certain extraordinary or unforeseen events ("Target EBITDA"). The Company must achieve at least a "threshold" amount of adjusted EBITDA (currently set at 85% of Target EBITDA) in order for executives to receive any portion of the annual short-term incentive bonus. In order for the Company's executives to receive the maximum amount of annual short-term incentive bonus the Company must achieve a "stretch" amount of adjusted EBITDA (currently set at 115% of Target EBITDA). In order to help manage potential payouts, annual short-term incentive opportunities are capped at the maximum bonus levels for such executive, regardless of the extent to which performance exceeds targeted levels. In addition, the amount of bonus for each executive is subject to reduction in the event that such executive does not achieve certain pre-approved and measurable professional goals for the year. We have typically elected to pay this award in cash, although we have discretion to pay this award in cash, equity or any combination of cash and equity. We set the ranges of bonuses payable to each executive as a percentage of annual base salary, consistent with the incentive programs and practices used by the Company's peer group.

        Equity Compensation.    We believe that the award of equity compensation is a critical component of the Company's executive compensation program because equity compensation directly and tangibly ties executive compensation to management's ability to increase shareholder value. Our experience has shown us that equity compensation fosters an atmosphere where employees "think like owners" and are


Table of Contents

motivated to increase the long-term value of the Company by aligning their interests with those of the Company's shareholders. Accordingly, we believe that equity compensation is an excellent tool to reflect the Company's principles of "pay for performance" so that an appropriate portion of each executive's compensation package will grow in value as shareholder value is increased. We also believe that this culture of employee ownership has been a significant contributing factor to the Company's success and will continue to play a vital role in future success. More specifically, in an industry that is growing in scope and complexity, we believe that equity compensation has been a critical tool in attracting and retaining executives with the type of entrepreneurial spirit that we believe is integral to the Company's success, as well as for incentivizing them to explore creative approaches to unlock shareholder value, such as the Spin-Off or the new business lines we are exploring.

        Consistent with the Board's desire to maximize shareholder value, we have taken steps to protect shareholder interests and promote shareholder value in both the design and the administration of the equity compensation program. Under the terms of the 2008 Plan, awards to employees are administered by the Committee. The vesting schedules for awards are designed to encourage employees to focus on the long-term success of the Company by requiring employees to remain with the Company for a number of years (typically four years) before all of their awards are vested and may be settled. The 2008 Plan does not permit the exercise price of outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights to be reduced nor does it permit the grant of discounted stock options or stock appreciation rights. Finally, the 2008 Plan includes a "fungible share" concept that requires the Company to count each share awarded as restricted stock, or pursuant to any other full value award, as an award of 2.44 shares for purposes of counting the shares available for issuance under the 2008 Plan, provided that awards settled only in cash are not counted against the shares available under the 2008 Plan.

        Deferred Compensation.    The Company does not maintain any defined benefit pension programs for its executives. Instead, consistent with the competitive practices of the Company's peer group, the Company maintains an elective nonqualified deferred compensation plan for executives. Pursuant to the plan, the Company provides a matching contribution on an executive's deferrals to the plan of up to 5% of the executive's base salary and annual bonus. All amounts credited to an executive's account are invested, as directed by the executive, in commonly available mutual funds, and the Company does not guarantee any minimum returns. The plan is unfunded and benefits are paid from the Company's general assets; however, the Company currently contributes funds into a grantor trust on a monthly basis in respect of these deferred compensation obligations. The Company generally sets aside separately the amounts deferred by the executives and the matching contributions thereon and, to protect against excess liabilities, invests such amounts in the mutual funds notionally selected by each executive. This program is described in more detail beginning on page 52 of this Proxy Statement.

        Benefits and Perquisites.    We offer a standard set of benefits to all of our employees, including medical, dental and vision insurance, group life insurance, short and long-term disability and a 401(k) with certain contributions matched by us. We believe that executives should be offered some limited additional benefits and perquisites that are reasonable relative to the benefits provided to all employees, are consistent with competitive and industry practices among the Company's peer group, and, in certain circumstances, may address a particular reasonable issue or concern of an executive. Consistent with these objectives, the Company also provides certain executive officers with discrete supplemental benefits and perquisites. The description and value of such supplemental benefits and perquisites in 2015 can be found on page 47 of this Proxy Statement.


Table of Contents

Analysis of Compensation

        Base Salary.    Each year, we review the base salary of each executive officer against the base salaries of similarly positioned executives in the Company's peer group. In doing so, we compare the base salary information contained in our peer group's most recently available proxy statements with comparable data for the Company's executive officers. For instance, in 2015, our review indicated that the target total compensation of Mr. Wilmott, as President and Chief Executive Officer, was at the 35th percentile relative to similarly positioned executives (Chief Executive Officers) in the Company's peer group (based on information in the peer group companies' 2014 proxy statements).

        For 2015, we deemed it appropriate to increase the base salary of each Named Executive Officer by 3.0%, with the exception of our General Counsel, who received an increase of 11.8% following an analysis of his performance and compensation relative to similarly positioned executives in the Company's peer group. The 3.0% increase represents the same increase generally received by the Company's corporate staff and is consistent with national compensation trends across all industries. The following table indicates the base compensation of each Named Executive Officer for 2015:

Executive



2015
Base Salary


President and Chief Executive Officer

$1,287,500

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

$746,750

Executive Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

$566,500

Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer

$515,000

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

$475,000

        Annual Short-Term Incentive.    In 2015, the Company achieved adjusted EBITDA for purposes of the 2008 Plan of $345.254 million, which is 112.96% of the adjusted EBITDA target. This adjusted EBITDA reflects adjustments from the Company's publicly announced adjusted EBITDA to include the impact of rent payments made to GLPI under the Master Lease and certain non-recurring events as permitted by the terms of the 2008 Plan. This resulted in our executive officers earning approximately 96% of the maximum payout under the annual bonus incentive plan. The following table indicates the actual amount paid to each Named Executive Officer for the annual short-term incentive for the year 2015:

Executive



2015
Actual Bonus


President and Chief Executive Officer

$2,165,575

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

$925,074

Executive Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

$486,737

Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer

$442,488

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

$340,100

        Equity Compensation.    In 2015, we made annual compensation grants of stock options to our executive officers, which were based on a percentage of each such executive's base salary. These grants


Table of Contents

are performance-based awards because their value is tied to the performance of the Company's stock price in the future, and no value is earned unless the stock price increases following the grant. In determining the amount of such grants, the Committee considered the extent to which the grant would reward such officers for increasing shareholder value and such qualitative factors as specific position duties and responsibilities, tenure with the Company, individual contribution and position value to the Company. The Committee also considered the size of the grant in relation to the diluted shares outstanding and the Company's s recent and long-term performance. All equity awards granted in 2015 vest at the rate of 25% per year, subject to the executive's continued employment.

        The following table indicates the equity grants made to each of the Named Executive Officers in 2015 as part of our regular annual long-term incentive program:

Executive



2015
Option Awards


President and Chief Executive Officer

539,832

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

234,827

Executive Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

160,330

Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer

107,966

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

74,686

        Transition Award Program.    As more fully discussed in last year's proxy statement, the Company made a one-time grant of the Company's phantom stock units on July 22, 2014 to the Named Executive Officers and certain of its other employees pursuant to the TAP. As these were one-time grants, there were no additional awards made under the TAP during 2015.

Changes to 2016 Compensation

        On February 9, 2016, the Compensation Committee adopted a Performance Share Program (the "Performance Share Program") pursuant to the 2008 Plan, which contains performance-based vesting for a meaningful portion of equity awards, with each grant not fully vesting until the third anniversary of the grant date. The Performance Share Program was adopted to provide key executives with equity-based compensation tied directly to Company performance to further align their interests with those of shareholders, and to provide compensation only if the designated performance goal is met for the applicable performance period. The Company's named executive officers and other key executives are eligible to participate in the Performance Share Program.

Employment Agreements

        During 2014, the Company entered into new severance agreements with each of its executive officers, other than Messrs. Reibstein and Fair, who entered into employment agreements during 2013. None of these agreements were amended or modified in 2015. In addition, none of these contracts contain a single trigger change in control provision or a tax indemnification provision. For a detailed discussion of the terms contained in each Named Executive Officer's employment agreement (if applicable), please refer to pages 55 to 58 of this Proxy Statement.


Table of Contents

Other Compensation Policies

        Hedging and Pledging Policy.    We believe that equity ownership fosters an atmosphere where directors and officers "think like owners" and are motivated to increase the long-term value of the Company by aligning their interests with those of the Company's shareholders. Accordingly, we have adopted policies prohibiting each of the Company's directors and executive officers from engaging in hedging transactions or pledging Company shares.

        Compensation Clawback Policy.    As a highly regulated, multi-jurisdictional gaming and racing company, the Company has maintained a long-standing commitment to ensure that its executive officers adhere to the highest professional and ethical standards. Accordingly, the Company has adopted a policy pursuant to which misconduct by any executive officer that leads to a restatement of the Company's financial results could subject such individuals to a disgorgement of prior compensation. In the event of a restatement, in light of the highly regulated nature of the Company's business, the Committee would likely pursue such remedy where appropriate, based on the facts and circumstances surrounding the restatement and existing laws. The Committee will amend the Company's clawback policy, as required, once the final Nasdaq Listing Rules have been adopted implementing rules regarding compensation clawbacks mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act.

        Statutory and Regulatory Considerations.    In designing the Company's compensatory programs, we consider the various tax, accounting and disclosure rules associated with various forms of compensation. We also review and consider the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, which generally provides that the Company may not deduct certain compensation of more than $1 million that is paid to certain individuals. The Company generally will be entitled to take tax deductions related to performance-based compensation or to compensation not payable until the executive leaves the Company, which may include cash incentives, stock options, restricted stock or other performance-based awards. We seek to preserve the Company's tax deductions for executive compensation to the extent consistent with the Company's executive compensation objectives. However, we may also from time to time consider and grant compensation that may not be tax deductible if we believe such compensation is warranted to achieve the Company's objectives.

        Timing of Option Grants.    In December 2015, the Company adopted an Equity-Based Award Policy, pursuant to which, for annual stock option awards to eligible executive officers, the grant date will be the second trading day of the calendar year. From time to time, annual grants may be made on a later date in the year as a result of the timing of the determination of the awards or other factors. In addition, with respect to executive officers subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16 of the Exchange Act, grants made by us upon commencement of employment or promotions are made on the day employment commences or the promotion is effective. In the case of the options awarded in 2015, the grants were made on January 6, 2015.

        All option grants, whether granted on the first trading day of the calendar year or later in the year, are priced in accordance with the terms of the applicable equity compensation plans, which require, among other things, that the exercise price of all stock options be established by reference to the closing price on the trading day immediately prior to the date of grant.

Reconciliations and Non-GAAP Financial Measures

        Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin are non-GAAP financial measures. For a discussion of adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income see pages 56 through 59 of the "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" section of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed with the SEC on March 15, 2016. Adjusted EBITDA margin is calculated by dividing adjusted EBITDA by revenues for the applicable period.


Table of Contents

Compensation Committee Report

        The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis") with the management of the Company. In addition, as discussed beginning on page 15 of this Proxy Statement, the Committee retained the services of Exequity LLP as its independent compensation consultant in order to receive independent expert advice on executive compensation matters and guidance with respect to compensation best practices, among other things. The compensation actions taken in 2015 and described in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis were taken in consultation with, and were supported by, the Consultant.

        Based on the review and discussions described above, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors



Harold Cramer, Chairman
David A. Handler
Barbara Shattuck Kohn

Table of Contents


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

        The following table summarizes certain information with respect to the Company's compensation plans and individual compensation arrangements under which the Company's equity securities have been authorized for issuance as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015:

 

 

  (a)  (b)  (c) 

 

 

Plan Category

  Number of
securities to be
issued upon exercise
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights






 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights ($)





 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))






 

 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

   6,508,572   10.03   5,480,017  

*
The 2008 Plan provides that, while awards of stock options and stock appreciation rights are counted as one share of common stock granted under such plan, awards of restricted stock, or shares issued pursuant to any other full value awards, are counted as issuing 2.44 shares of common stock per share awarded for purposes of determining the number of shares available for issuance under such plan. Awards that are settled in cash rather than shares of stock are not counted against the limit in the 2008 Plan.

Table of Contents


COMPENSATION TABLES

Summary Compensation Table

        The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation earned during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 by the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and the Company's three other most highly compensated individuals serving as executive officers during 2015 (collectively, the "Named Executive Officers"):

Name and Principal Position
Year


Salary ($)




Stock
Awards ($)
(1)






Option
Awards ($)
(2)







Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) (3)






Bonus ($)
(5)





All Other
Compensation
($) (4)




Total ($)

Timothy J. Wilmott
President and Chief Executive Officer
2015
2014
2013
1,335,144
1,288,287
1,447,469

4,000,005
2,872,082
2,576,371
2,501,445
2,165,575
1,535,248
782,148


105,132
102,689
110,548
6,182,222
9,427,674
5,212,247
Jay A. Snowden
Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer
2015
2014
2013
774,383
716,101
570,110

1,199,997
597,397
1,120,722
1,088,130
925,074
602,024
181,213


74,120
50,066
33,605
2,894,299
3,656,318
1,382,325
Saul V. Reibstein
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
2015
2014
2013
587,464
550,000
16,923

1,642,501
260,159
765,182

486,737
322,805

225,000
5,300

50,484
1,844,683
2,740,306
327,566
William J. Fair
Executive Vice President and
Chief Development Officer
2015
2014
534,058
471,154

1,000,001
515,272
500,289
442,488
293,459

175,000
41,376
22,115
1,533,194
2,462,018
Carl Sottosanti
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
2015
2014
490,770
410,631

1,000,001
356,442
318,935
340,100
207,867

40,232
28,258
1,227,544
1,965,692

(1)
The amounts reflect the full grant date fair value calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 ("ASC 718") for restricted stock awards and phantom stock unit awards. Included in Stock Awards for the year ended 2014 are phantom stock units granted on July 23, 2014 to all executive officers in connection with the TAP. Included in Stock Awards for the year 2013 are restricted stock awards granted on March 18, 2013 to all executives in lieu of options, with exception of Mr. Reibstein, who was awarded phantom stock unit awards on January 19, 2013 (as a Board member), relating to the Company's annual equity grants. Also included in Stock Awards for the year 2013 are phantom stock units for executives granted on February 24, 2014 relating to the Company's payment of the external portion of the Company's annual incentive plan for 2013.

(2)
The amounts reflect the full grant date fair value calculated in accordance with ASC 718 for stock option awards. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are described in footnote 4 to the Company's audited financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

(3)
The amounts reflect cash payments for 2015, 2014 and 2013 pursuant to the internal measure portion of the Company's annual short-term incentive plan, which provided for the payment of incentive compensation upon the Company's achievement of pre-established adjusted EBITDA goals. Based on the Company's adjusted EBITDA performance for 2015, the executives received the target payout plus 86.4% of the difference between target and stretch payout for the annual short-term incentive bonus. Based on the Company's adjusted EBITDA performance for 2014, the executives received the threshold payout plus 96% of the difference between threshold and target payout for the annual short-term incentive bonus. Based on the Company's adjusted EBITDA performance for 2013, the executives received the threshold payout plus 27% of the difference between the threshold payout and target payout. For more information on the Company's annual short-term incentive plan, see the discussion beginning on page 38 of this Proxy Statement.

(4)
See All Other Compensation Table below for more information.

(5)
The amounts reflect one-time signing bonuses paid upon the commencement of employment for Mr. Reibstein and Mr. Fair of $225,000 and $175,000, respectively.

Table of Contents

All Other Compensation Table

        The following table describes each component of the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table for the Named Executive Officers:

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  Name


Year






Company
Contributions
to Deferred
Compensation
Plan ($) (1)









Company
Contributions
to 401(k) ($)
(2)









Company-
Paid
Insurance
Premiums
($)(3)






Other ($)(4)


Total ($)

 
  Timothy J. Wilmott  2015  66,757  5,300  33,075    105,132  
     2014  64,414  5,200  33,075    102,689  
     2013  72,373  5,100  33,075    110,548  

 

 

Jay A. Snowden

 

 

2015

 

 

68,820

 

 

5,300

 

 


 

 


 

 

74,120

 

 
     2014  44,866  5,200      50,066  
     2013  28,505  5,100      33,605  

 

 

Saul V. Reibstein

 

 

2015

 

 


 

 

5,300

 

 


 

 


 

 

5,300

 

 
     2014            
     2013        50,484  50,484  

 

 

William J. Fair

 

 

2015

 

 

41,376

 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 

41,376

 

 
     2014  22,115        22,115  

 

 

Carl Sottosanti

 

 

2015

 

 

34,932

 

 

5,300

 

 


 

 


 

 

40,232

 

 
     2014  23,058  5,200      28,258  

(1)
This column reports the Company's matching contributions under the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan.

(2)
This column reports the Company's contributions to the executive's 401(k) savings accounts.

(3)
This column reports life insurance policy premiums and other insurance premiums paid by the Company on behalf of the executive.

(4)
This column represents Board of Director compensation that Mr. Reibstein earned from January 1, 2013 through December 3, 2013.

Table of Contents

2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

        The following table sets forth certain information regarding grants of plan-based awards relating to 2015 for the Named Executive Officers.

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

 

 

   Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards ($)
 



      

 

 

Name



Grant Date


Threshold ($)


Target ($)


Maximum ($)




Option
Awards
(#)






All Other Stock
Awards: Number
of Securities (#)






Exercise Price
of Option
Awards ($)







Grant Date
Fair Value of
Option Awards
($)(1)




 

 

Tim Wilmott (2)

    965,625  1,609,375  2,253,125          

 

 

Tim Wilmott (3)

  1/6/2015        539,832    13.19  2,576,371  

 

 

Jay A. Snowden (2)

    298,700  634,738  970,775          

 

 

Jay A. Snowden (3)

  1/6/2015        234,827    13.19  1,120,722  

 

 

Saul V. Reibstein (2)

    169,950  339,900  509,850          

 

 

Saul V. Reibstein (3)

  1/6/2015        160,330    13.19  765,182  

 

 

William J. Fair (2)

    154,500  309,000  463,500          

 

 

William J. Fair (3)

  1/6/2015        107,966    13.19  515,272  

 

 

Carl Sottosanti (2)

    118,750  237,500  356,250          

 

 

Carl Sottosanti (3)

  1/6/2015        74,686    13.19  356,442  

(1)
Represents the full grant date fair value of awards under ASC 718. Generally, the full grant date fair value is the amount the Company expenses in its financial statements over the award's vesting period. Assumptions used in the calculation of the amounts for stock option awards are included in footnote 4 to the Company's audited financial statements beginning on page 90 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

(2)
As reported in the Summary Compensation Table, the actual cash bonuses awarded under the Company's non-equity incentive plan for 2015 were as follows: (i) Mr. Wilmott, $2,165,575; (ii) Mr. Snowden, $925,074; (iii) Mr. Reibstein, $486,737; (iv) Mr. Fair, $442,488 and (v) Mr. Sottosanti, $340,100.

(3)
Awards represent stock options granted to the executives as part of their annual equity incentive compensation. All grants vest over four years, 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 25% on each succeeding anniversary. In the event of a change in control, awards vest immediately.

Table of Contents

Outstanding 2015 Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

        The following table sets forth information concerning equity awards outstanding as of December 31, 2015 for the Named Executive Officers:

Outstanding Equity Awards (PENN):

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

​  

 

 
Option Awards
    
Stock Awards
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

​  

 

 


Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options:



         
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

​  

 

Name




Exercisable
(#)




Unexercisable
(#) (1)





Option
Exercise
Price ($)






Option
Expiration
Date



 


Stock
Award
Grant Date








Number of
Shares or
Units Held that
Have Not
Vested (#)









Market Value of
Shares or Units
Held that Have Not
Vested ($) (4)




  

 

Timothy J. Wilmott

  200,000    6.34  01/02/17    02/06/12(3) 9,634  154,337  

  

    200,000    8.19  01/03/18    01/29/13(3) 18,324  293,550  

  

    186,612    6.96  07/08/18    03/18/13(2) 20,000  320,400  

  

    150,000  50,000  8.88  01/03/19    02/24/14(5) 46,776  749,352  

  

    12,627  37,878  11.61(8) 02/24/21    07/23/14(6) 229,885  3,682,758  

  

    113,637  340,908  11.61  02/24/21             

  

      539,832  13.19  01/06/22             

  

 

Jay A. Snowden

  
150,000
  
  
8.88
  
10/11/18
    
02/06/12(3

)
 
570
  
9,131
  

  

    7,500  2,500  8.88  01/03/19    01/29/13(3) 4,245  68,005  

  

    5,493  16,477  11.61(8) 02/24/21    03/18/13(2) 4,000  64,080  

  

    49,432  148,295  11.61  02/24/21    02/24/14(5) 10,839  173,641  

  

      234,827  13.19  01/06/22    07/23/14(6) 68,965  1,104,819  

  

 

Saul V. Reibstein

  
  
160,330
  
13.19
  
01/06/22
    
01/03/12(3

)
 
1,641
  
26,289
  

  

                  02/19/13(3) 2,545  40,771  

  

                  01/14/14(7) 37,500  600,750  

  

                  07/23/14(6) 57,471  920,685  

  

 

William J. Fair

  
2,526
  
7,575
  
11.61

(8)
 
02/24/21
    
07/23/14(6

)
 
57,471
  
920,685
  

  

    22,728  68,181  11.61  02/24/21             

  

      107,966  13.19  01/06/22             

  

 

Carl Sottosanti

  
17,598
  
  
9.70
  
01/01/17
    
02/06/12(3

)
 
622
  
9,964
  

  

    20,000    6.34  01/02/17    01/29/13(3) 1,184  18,968  

  

    20,000    6.96  07/08/18    03/18/13(2) 2,000  32,040  

  

    20,000    8.19  01/03/18    02/24/14(5) 3,024  48,444  

  

    15,000  5,000  8.88  01/03/19    07/23/14(6) 57,471  920,685  

  

    1,610  4,829  11.61(8) 02/24/21             

  

    14,489  43,466  11.61  02/24/21             

  

      74,686  13.19  01/06/22             

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards (GLPI):

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

​  

 

 
Option Awards
    
Stock Awards
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

​  

 

 


Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options:



      
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

​  

 

Name




Exercisable
(#)




Unexercisable
(#) (1) (10)





Option
Exercise
Price ($)






Option
Expiration
Date



 


Stock
Award
Grant Date









Number of
Shares or
Units Held that
Have Not
Vested (#)
(9)










Market Value of
Shares or Units
Held that Have Not
Vested ($) (4)




  

 

Timothy J. Wilmott

  264,310    15.78  01/02/17    02/06/12(3)  12,113  336,741  

  

    264,310    20.40  01/03/18    01/29/13(3)  23,038  640,456  

  

    246,617    17.34  07/08/18    03/18/13(2)  25,145  699,031  

  

    198,233  66,077  22.09  01/03/19             

  

 

Jay A. Snowden

  
148,233
  
  
22.10
  
10/11/18
    
02/06/12(3)
  
717
  
19,933
  

  

    9,912  3,304  22.09  01/03/19    01/29/13(3)  5,337  148,369  

  

                  03/18/13(2)  5,029  139,806  

  

 

Saul V. Reibstein

                
01/03/12(3)
  
2,063
  
57,351
  

  

                  02/19/13(3)  3,200  88,960  

  

 

Carl Sottosanti

  
23,257
  
  
24.15
  
01/02/17
    
02/06/12(3)
  
782
  
21,740
  

  

    26,431    20.40  01/03/18    01/29/13(3)  1,488  41,366  

  

    22,008    17.34  07/08/18    03/18/13(2)  2,514  69,889  

  

    19,823  6,608  22.09  01/03/19             

(1)
Options vest over four years, 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 25% on each succeeding anniversary. In the event of a change in control, options vest immediately.

(2)
Represents restricted stock awards. The forfeiture provisions on the restricted stock awards granted on March 18, 2013 and June 12, 2013 lapse 25% on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the date of grant. In the event of a change in control, the forfeiture restrictions on restricted stock lapse immediately.

(3)
Represents phantom stock unit awards. All awards granted are scheduled to vest over four years, 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 25% on each succeeding anniversary. In the event of a change in control, the forfeiture restrictions on phantom stock unit awards lapse immediately.

(4)
Calculated based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on December 31, 2015 ($16.02 for the Company and $27.80 for GLPI), which was the last trading day of 2015.

(5)
Represents awards for executives under the external measure of the annual incentive plan for 2013.

(6)
Represents phantom stock units issued pursuant to the TAP. These phantom stock units vest over three years, 33.33% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 33.33% on each succeeding anniversary. In the event of a change in control, the phantom stock units vest immediately.

(7)
Mr. Reibstein was granted 50,000 phantom stock units pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement.

(8)
Represents cash-settled stock appreciation rights. These stock appreciation rights vest over four years, 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 25% on each succeeding anniversary. In the event of a change in control, the stock appreciation rights vest immediately.

(9)
Dividends equivalents accrued but not yet paid on outstanding stock awards as of December 31, 2015 for each named executive officer were as follows: Mr. Wilmott, $226,567; Mr. Snowden, $34,612; Mr. Reibstein, $31,453; and Mr. Sottosanti, $14,573.

(10)
Dividends equivalents accrued but not yet paid on outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2015 for each named executive officer were as follows: Mr. Wilmott, $307,919; Mr. Snowden, $15,397; and Mr. Sottosanti, $30,793.

Table of Contents

2015 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

        The following table sets forth information concerning options exercised, restricted stock awards vested and phantom stock units awards vested during fiscal 2015 for the Named Executive Officers.

Exercises and vesting of awards (PENN):

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

​  

 

 
Option Awards

Stock Awards

Phantom Stock Unit Awards
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

​  

 

Name







Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)








Value Realized
on Exercise
($)








Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)








Value Realized
on Vesting
($)








Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)









Value
Realized
on Vesting
($)




  

 

Timothy J. Wilmott

  200,000  2,705,940  10,000  163,800  156,948  2,899,513  

  

 

Jay A. Snowden

      2,000  32,760  40,791  764,858  

  

 

Saul V Reibstein

          44,151  779,744  

  

 

William J. Fair

          28,736  552,881  

  

 

Carl Sottosanti

  57,402  616,837  1,000  16,380  31,425  596,885  

Exercises and vesting of awards (GLPI):

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

​  

 

 
Option Awards

Stock Awards

Phantom Stock Unit Awards
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

​  

 

Name







Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)








Value Realized
on Exercise
($) (1)








Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)








Value Realized
on Vesting
($)








Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)









Value
Realized
on Vesting
($) (2)




  

 

Timothy J. Wilmott

    327,744  50,290  457,872  151,987  1,295,117  

  

 

Jay A. Snowden

  50,000  708,994  10,058  91,560  13,544  138,764  

  

 

Saul V Reibstein

          14,657  131,522  

  

 

William J. Fair

              

  

 

Carl Sottosanti

  81,910  1,511,234  5,029  45,816  9,617  84,725  

(1)
Includes cash payments for dividend equivalents on GLPI options following their vesting.

(2)
Values realized upon vesting of restricted stock awards and phantom stock unit awards include cash payments for dividend equivalents.

Table of Contents

2015 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

        The following table sets forth information concerning nonqualified deferred compensation of the Named Executive Officers:

 

 

Name






Executive
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year
($)(1)








Company
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year
($)(2)








Aggregate
Earnings in
Last Fiscal Year
($)(3)








Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)









Aggregate
Balance at
Last Fiscal
Year End
($)(4)





 

 

Timothy J.Wilmott

  267,029  66,757  (8,684) (1,504) 3,571,765  

 

 

Jay A. Snowden

  137,641  68,820  (4,684) (1,580) 589,614  

 

 

Saul V. Reibstein

            

 

 

William J. Fair

  82,752  41,376  (7,536) (379) 182,410  

 

 

Carl Sottosanti

  80,257  34,932  (5,825) (790) 1,096,480  

(1)
For each executive, the executive's contribution is included in the executive's salary and/or non-equity executive compensation for 2015, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)
For each executive, the Company's contribution is included in the executive's other compensation for 2015, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

(3)
Amounts reflect the change in account value during 2015. No amounts are reported in the Summary Compensation Table because the earnings were not above market or preferential.

(4)
The amount of each executive's aggregate balance at fiscal year-end that was reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for previous years is set forth below:

Name





Amount
Previously
Reported ($)



Timothy J. Wilmott

322,071

Jay A. Snowden

152,719

Saul V. Reibstein

William Fair

66,346

Carl Sottosanti

71,700

        Penn National Gaming, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan.    Pursuant to the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended, most management and certain other highly compensated employees selected by the committee administering the plan (the "Retirement Committee") may elect to defer, on a pre-tax basis, a percentage of his or her salary and/or bonus. The minimum annual deferrable amount is $3,000 and the maximum is 90% of his or her base annual salary and/or bonus. Generally, deferral elections must be made before the beginning of the year in which compensation will be earned. The Company's contributions under the plan are equal to 50% of the participant's deferral for the first 10% of the salary and/or bonus deferred, subject to a maximum annual Company contribution equal to 5% of the participant's salary and/or bonus. With the Board of Directors' approval, the Company is also permitted to make discretionary contributions. Participants are always 100% vested in their own contributions, but Company contributions vest 20% per year of service with the Company. Therefore, employees with five or more years of service are fully vested in Company contributions under the plan. However, for employees with less than five years of service, all Company contributions become immediately and fully vested upon death, retirement or a change in control of the Company, as defined in the Deferred Compensation Plan. The Retirement Committee may accelerate vesting of the Company's contributions if a participant terminates his or her employment because of disability.

        Subject to the exceptions discussed below, participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan, or their beneficiaries, receive distributions upon retirement, death or termination. Participants can elect to


Table of Contents

receive distributions following retirement or death in the form of a lump sum payment or payment in five or ten annual installments. Distributions following retirement can be deferred for at least five years. For purposes of the Deferred Compensation Plan, termination of employment as a result of a disability will be considered retirement.

        Distributions following termination of employment other than as a result of retirement or death will be in the form of a lump sum payment. Participants can also elect to receive a scheduled distribution with respect to an annual deferral amount, which is payable in a lump sum at the beginning of a designated subsequent calendar year, subject to certain limitations. In the event of an unforeseeable financial emergency and with the approval of the Retirement Committee, a participant can suspend deferrals or receive a partial or full payout under the plan. Certain specified employees have a six-month delay imposed upon distributions pursuant to a separation from service, as required by the final Code section 409A regulations. In the event of a change in control, the Company will accelerate installment payments that are in pay status by paying the account balance in lump sum and will distribute the account balances of all active participants in a lump sum; provided, however, that no distributions (or accelerations of installments) will occur unless the transaction qualifies as a "change in control event" under Code section 409A.

        Participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan may notionally invest deferred amounts, including Company contributions, in mutual funds selected by the Retirement Committee. Participants may change their investment elections at any time.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

        The following tables describe and quantify the compensation that would become payable in the event of a termination of a Named Executive Officer's employment under several different circumstances or a change in control. The amounts shown are estimates of amounts that would be paid to the Named Executive Officers assuming that such termination or change in control was effective as of December 31, 2015, and thus include amounts earned through such time and are based (where applicable) on the closing price of the applicable common stock on such date ($16.02 for the Company and $27.80 for GLPI). The actual amounts to be paid can only be determined at the time of such Named Executive Officer's separation from the Company or change in control. For a description of the severance and change in control provisions giving rise to the payments set forth below, see pages 55 through 58 of this Proxy Statement.

Post-Employment Payments—Timothy J. Wilmott

 

 

Executive Payments





Voluntary
Termination by
Executive ($)





Termination
without Cause
by Company ($)


 



Termination
for Cause
by Company ($)





Termination
Upon Death ($)





Termination
upon
Disability ($)





Change in
Control ($)(1)





Change in Control
Termination
without Cause ($)



 

 

Cash Severance Benefit (2)

    5,823,363    5,823,363  5,823,363    5,793,750  

 

 

Benefit Continuation (3)

    52,312    52,312  52,312    52,312  

 

 

Restricted Shares (4)

    5,990,256    6,177,594  6,177,594  6,177,594  6,177,594  

 

 

Unvested Stock Options (5)

    2,750,997(6)   3,932,470(6) 3,932,470(6) 3,932,470  3,932,470  

 

 

Dividend equivalents on GLPI awards (7)

    534,486    534,486  534,486  534,486  534,486  

 

 

Vested Stock Options (5)

  15,664,953  15,664,953  4,270,319  15,664,953  15,664,953  15,664,953  15,664,953  

 

 

Vested Deferred Compensation Balance (8)

  3,571,765  3,571,765  3,571,765  3,571,765  3,571,765  3,571,765  3,571,765  

 

 

Total

 $19,236,718 $34,388,132 $7,842,084 $35,756,943 $35,756,943 $29,881,268 $35,727,330  

Table of Contents

Post-Employment Payments—Jay A. Snowden

 

 

Executive Payments





Voluntary
Termination by
Executive ($)






Termination
without Cause
by Company ($)






Termination
for Cause
by Company ($)





Termination
Upon Death ($)(9)





Termination
upon
Disability ($)





Change in
Control ($)(1)





Change in Control
Termination
without Cause ($)



 

 

Cash Severance Benefit (2)

    2,881,111    2,881,111  2,881,111    2,762,976  

 

 

Benefit Continuation (3)

    31,201    31,201  31,201    31,201  

 

 

Restricted Shares (4)

    1,544,567    1,587,978  1,587,978  1,587,978  1,587,978  

 

 

Unvested Stock Options (5)

    913,979(6)   1,427,921(6) 1,427,921(6) 1,427,921  1,427,921  

 

 

Dividend equivalents on GLPI awards (7)

    50,009    50,009  50,009  50,009  50,009  

 

 

Vested Stock Options (5)

  2,268,295  2,268,295    2,268,295  2,268,295  2,268,295  2,268,295  

 

 

Vested Deferred Compensation Balance (8)

  589,614  589,614  589,614  589,614  589,614  589,614  589,614  

 

 

Total

 $2,857,909 $8,278,776 $589,614 $8,836,129 $8,836,129 $5,923,817 $8,717,994  

Post-Employment Payments—Saul V. Reibstein

 

 

Executive Payments





Voluntary
Termination by
Executive ($)






Termination
without Cause
by Company ($)






Termination
for Cause
by Company ($)





Termination
Upon Death ($)





Termination
upon
Disability ($)





Change in
Control ($)(1)





Change in Control
Termination
without Cause ($)



 

 

Cash Severance Benefit (2)

    1,579,855    1,579,855  1,579,855    1,812,800  

 

 

Benefit Continuation (3)

    27,473    27,473  27,473    36,630  

 

 

Restricted Shares (4)

    1,277,724    1,734,807  1,734,807  1,734,807  1,734,807  

 

 

Unvested Stock Options (5)

    226,867(6)   453,734(6) 453,734(6) 453,734  453,734  

 

 

Dividend equivalents on GLPI awards (7)

    31,453    31,453  31,453  31,453  31,453  

 

 

Vested Stock Options (5)

                

 

 

Vested Deferred Compensation Balance (8)

                

 

 

Total

 $ $3,143,372 $ $3,827,322 $3,827,322 $2,219,994 $4,069,424  

Post-Employment Payments—William J. Fair

 

 

Executive Payments





Voluntary
Termination by
Executive ($)






Termination
without Cause
by Company ($)






Termination
for Cause
by Company ($)





Termination
Upon Death ($)





Termination
upon
Disability ($)





Change in
Control ($)(1)





Change in Control
Termination
without Cause ($)



 

 

Cash Severance Benefit (2)

    1,436,232    1,436,232  1,436,232    1,914,976  

 

 

Benefit Continuation (3)

    27,473    27,473  27,473    36,630  

 

 

Restricted Shares (4)

    613,790    920,685  920,685  920,685  920,685  

 

 

Unvested Stock Options (5)

    250,563(6)   334,084(6) 334,084(6) 334,084  334,084  

 

 

Dividend equivalents on GLPI awards (7)

                

 

 

Vested Stock Options (5)

  111,370  111,370    111,370  111,370  111,370  111,370  

 

 

Vested Deferred Compensation Balance (8)

  145,836  145,836  145,836  145,836  145,836  145,836  145,836  

 

 

Total

 $257,206 $2,585,264 $145,836 $2,975,680 $2,975,680 $1,511,975 $3,463,581  

Post-Employment Payments—Carl Sottosanti

 

 

Executive Payments





Voluntary
Termination by
Executive ($)






Termination
without Cause
by Company ($)






Termination
for Cause
by Company ($)





Termination
Upon Death ($)





Termination
upon
Disability ($)





Change in
Control ($)(1)





Change in Control
Termination
without Cause ($)



 

 

Cash Severance Benefit (2)

    1,222,650    1,222,650  1,222,650    1,425,000  

 

 

Benefit Continuation (3)

    23,401    23,401  23,401    31,201  

 

 

Restricted Shares (4)

    774,202    1,093,208  1,093,208  1,093,208  1,093,208  

 

 

Unvested Stock Options (5)

    338,848(6)   497,774(6) 497,774(6) 497,774  497,774  

 

 

Dividend equivalents on GLPI awards (7)

    45,366    45,366  45,366  45,366  45,366  

 

 

Vested Stock Options (5)

  1,444,586  1,444,586  607,511  1,444,586  1,444,586  1,444,586  1,444,586  

 

 

Vested Deferred Compensation Balance (8)

  1,096,480  1,096,480  1,096,480  1,096,480  1,096,480  1,096,480  1,096,480  

 

 

Total

 $2,541,066 $4,945,533 $1,703,991 $5,423,465 $5,423,465 $4,177,414 $5,633,615  

(1)
Upon the occurrence of a change in control, stock options, phantom stock units awards and stock appreciation right awards accelerate, and the restrictions on restricted stock lapse; no termination of employment is required.

Table of Contents

(2)
The basis for the cash severance benefit upon a termination following a change in control is the base salary for 2015 plus the target cash bonus earned for 2015, with the exception of Mr. Fair, whose cash benefit is based on the base salary for 2015 plus the actual cash bonus earned for 2015.

(3)
Represents employer cost of medical and dental coverage.

(4)
Restricted stock and phantom stock unit award values were computed based on the closing price of the applicable common stock on December 31, 2015 ($16.02 for the Company and $27.80 for GLPI), which was the last trading day of 2015.

(5)
Amounts represent the difference between the exercise price of each Named Executive Officer's options and the closing price of the applicable common stock on December 31, 2015 ($16.02 for the Company and $27.80 for GLPI). Vested stock options issued under the 2008 Plan are cancelled when an executive is terminated for cause by the Company. However, vested options granted under the Company's prior long-term incentive plan (which is effective for awards prior to 2008) are generally not cancelled upon a termination for cause.

(6)
Unvested options that would vest during the applicable severance period vest upon termination but may not be exercised until the time that such options would have vested had the executive continued to be employed through the applicable severance period. Restrictions lapse upon death or a change in control.

(7)
Dividend equivalents payable for GLPI option and phantom stock unit awards during severance period or following death or disability and change in control events.

(8)
Company contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan vest 20% per year during the first five years of service. However, vesting is accelerated upon death, change in control or, at the option of the committee administering the 2008 Plan, disability.

Employment Agreements

        The Company has entered into severance or employment agreements with all of its key executive officers. A majority of these agreements, including those with Messrs. Wilmott, Snowden and Sottosanti, are severance agreements entered into during June 2014 that have a term of two years. The Company also entered into employment agreements with Messrs. Reibstein and Fair during 2013, each of which have a term of three years. None of these agreements contain single trigger change in control or tax indemnification provisions. The Company determined to enter into these agreements in recognition of the continuing need to attract and retain experienced, proven executives (particularly in light of the increased competition for talent in its industry) and to protect the Company from certain competitive risk. The Committee plans to continue to evaluate whether and in what form to utilize severance or employment agreements in the future. For key employees with whom the Company does not seek to have severance or employment agreements, the Company has designed other policies and programs for attracting and retaining talented individuals.

Summary of Key Terms

        Term.    The term of each severance or employment agreement in effect as of December 31, 2015 is three years or less (with a majority of the agreements expiring in less than a year). The Company believes that the length of each employment term represents a reasonable period for which the Company and the executive will mutually commit to maintain the employment relationship. For the Company, this provides stability and predictability among its leadership ranks. For the executive, this provides a reasonable but limited assurance of job security designed to foster an environment of entrepreneurial risk taking where the executive can focus on building long-term shareholder value.

        Termination and Restrictive Covenants.    The Company offers certain additional payments to its Named Executive Officers if the Company elects to terminate the executive's employment without "cause" or as a result of death or total disability. Such termination payments are not available to the executive if the executive resigns (regardless of whether or not such executive has good reason) or if the executive is terminated for "cause." All termination payments are expressly conditioned on the executive providing a written release of all liabilities to the Company and the executive's agreement to comply with the restrictive covenants described below for the time period for which such payments are


Table of Contents

made. All payments are subject to forfeiture and/or clawback in the event that the executive breaches any term of the restrictive covenants.

        Each severance or employment agreement contains a comprehensive set of restrictive covenants designed to provide the Company with a reasonable degree of protection with regards to its strategic plans, intellectual property and human capital. Generally, each employment agreement contains prohibitions on (i) competition with the Company within 150 miles of any facility in which the Company or its affiliates owns or operates or is actively seeking to own or operate a facility, (ii) solicitation of any employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, and (iii) disclosure and use of any of the Company's confidential information. The Board selected the time periods for which each executive is bound by these restrictive covenants based on its determination about the extent to which such individual's tenure and knowledge of the Company could be used to adversely impact the Company's strategic plans, intellectual property or human capital. If an executive violates any of these provisions, in addition to any other legal or equitable remedies available to the Company, the executive must repay to the Company all amounts paid upon termination, forfeit any amounts then still payable in connection with such termination and, as set forth in the applicable compensation plans, forfeit all outstanding equity awards (regardless of whether such awards had vested before or after termination).

        For Mr. Reibstein and Mr. Fair, the additional payments following termination consist of a cash payment equal to (i) the greater of (x) the product of 1.5 multiplied by the annual rate of base salary in effect on the termination date or (y) if such termination takes place during the initial term, the product of the number of months remaining in the employment term multiplied by the monthly rate of base salary in effect on the termination date, plus (ii) 1.5 multiplied by the annual cash bonus that would have been paid to such executive based on the actual performance of the Company for the calendar year in which the termination occurred, paid at the time such bonuses are paid to similarly situated employees. In the case of each other applicable Named Executive Officer, additional payments consist of a cash payment equal to (i) either eighteen (18) months, in the case of Mr. Sottosanti, or twenty-four (24) months, in the case of Mr. Wilmott and Mr. Snowden, of the executive's base salary as of such date, paid in accordance with the Company's regular payroll procedures, plus (ii) 1.5 multiplied by the annual cash bonus that would have been paid to such executive based on the actual performance of the Company for the calendar year in which the termination occurred, paid at the time such bonuses are paid to similarly situated employees. The Board selected these amounts based on the rationale that it was willing to continue to pay each executive an amount reflecting the foregone compensation over the period that the Company desired the executive to remain subject to the restrictive covenants.

        Change in Control.    The Company has eliminated "single trigger" change in control provisions from its severance and employment agreements. In the event of a termination within 12 months (or 24 months in the case of Mr. Wilmott) following a change in control, each Named Executive Officer is entitled to receive a cash payment equal to two times the sum of (i) his base salary and (ii) the amount of his targeted bonus compensation, each at a rate in effect at the time of the change of control or the termination date, whichever is greater. To the extent that an executive receives a change in control payment, such executive will not be eligible to receive any additional cash severance in the event of a termination of employment during the employment term.

        Tax Indemnity.    The Company has eliminated tax indemnification provisions from its severance and employment agreements. These tax indemnity provisions were intended to provide the executive with protection if a change in control or termination payment results in a parachute excise tax.

        In addition to the key terms relating to severance, change in control, restrictive covenants and tax indemnity provisions described above, the employment agreements with Messrs. Reibstein and Fair provides for additional compensation through participation in the Company's annual short-term incentive plan, eligibility for awards under the Company's long-term incentive compensation plans then in effect and certain other benefits, including health, vacation and deferred compensation.


Table of Contents

        The specific terms of each of the individual agreements for the Named Executive Officers who had severance or employment agreements with the Company as of December 31, 2015 are as follows:

        Timothy J. Wilmott.    On June 13, 2014, the Company entered into a severance agreement with Timothy J. Wilmott, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, with an initial term expiring on June 13, 2016. Mr. Wilmott's annual compensation is reviewed annually and established by the Compensation Committee as described on pages 15 and 41 of this Proxy Statement.

        Jay A. Snowden.    On June 13, 2014, the Company entered into a severance agreement with Jay A. Snowden, the Company's Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, with an initial term expiring on June 13, 2016. Mr. Snowden's annual compensation is reviewed annually and established by the Compensation Committee as described on pages 15 and 41 of this Proxy Statement.

        Saul V. Reibstein.    On November 25, 2013, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Saul V. Reibstein, Executive Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, with an initial term expiring on December 3, 2016. Mr. Reibstein's annual compensation is reviewed annually and established by the Compensation Committee as described on pages 15 and 41 of this Proxy Statement. The severance period in Mr. Reibstein's agreement for purposes of calculating severance benefits is the greater of the period remaining under the then current term of the employment agreement and eighteen months.

        William J. Fair.    On December 17, 2013, the Company entered into an employment agreement with William J. Fair, the Company's Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer, with an initial term expiring on January 6, 2017. Mr. Fair's annual compensation is reviewed annually and established by the Compensation Committee as described on pages 15 and 41 of this Proxy Statement.

        Carl Sottosanti.    On June 13, 2014, the Company entered into a severance agreement with Carl Sottosanti, the Company's Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, with an initial term expiring on June 13, 2016. Mr. Sottosanti's annual compensation is reviewed annually and established by the Compensation Committee as described on pages 15 and 41 of this Proxy Statement.

        The employment agreements for each Named Executive Officer are incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed with the SEC on March 15, 2016.

        For purposes of the potential termination and change in control payments described in this Proxy Statement, the terms set forth below have the meanings ascribed to them:

        Change in Control—a change in control is defined as the occurrence of one or more of the following events: (i) a person, entity or group becomes the beneficial owner of shares representing 50% or more of (a) the Company's outstanding shares or (b) the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote in the election of directors, except when such beneficial ownership is due to an acquisition directly from or by the Company or a Company employee benefit plan or pursuant to a consolidation, merger or share exchange reorganization between the Company and another entity described below; (ii) the shareholders of the Company approve any plan or proposal for the complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company; (iii) the Company consummates a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or the acquisition of assets of another entity, unless, following such transaction, (a) all or substantially all of the beneficial owners immediately prior to such transaction still beneficially own more than 50% of the Company's outstanding shares, (b) no person beneficially owns 20% or more of the Company's outstanding shares who did not own such amount prior to the transaction and (c) at least a majority of the directors are continuing directors; or (iv) any time continuing directors do not constitute a majority of the Board.


Table of Contents

        Good Reason—an executive officer has "good reason" if (a) such officer is assigned to duties inconsistent with his position or authority, (b) such officer's compensation is reduced or there is a substantial reduction in benefits taken as a whole, (c) such officer's travel requirements are materially increased, or (d) such officer's employment agreement is materially breached by the Company.

        Cause—the Company has "cause" if the executive officer (a) is convicted of a felony or any misdemeanor involving allegations of fraud, theft, perjury or conspiracy, (b) is found disqualified or not suitable to hold a casino or other gaming license by a governmental gaming authority in any jurisdiction where such executive is required to be found qualified, suitable or licensed, (c) materially breaches the employment or severance agreement or any material Company policy, (d) misappropriates corporate funds as determined in good faith by the Audit Committee of the Board, (e) is determined by the Company to have willfully and continuously failed to perform his or her duties with the Company or (f) is determined by the Company to have willfully engaged in illegal conduct or gross misconduct which is materially injurious to the Company or one of its affiliates.


Table of Contents


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT

        The following table sets forth certain information with respect to beneficial ownership of the Company's common stock as of March 31, 2016 by each person known to the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company's outstanding common stock, each director and director nominee, each Named Executive Officer and all of the executive officers and directors of the Company as a group. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the table, the address of each such person is c/o the Company, 825 Berkshire Boulevard, Suite 200, Wyomissing, Pennsylvania 19610.

        Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act. Shares of common stock subject to options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2016 are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage beneficially owned by such holder, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage beneficially owned by any other person. Except as otherwise indicated, the Company believes that the beneficial owners of the common stock listed below, based on information furnished by such owners, have sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares, subject to community property laws where applicable, and that there are no other affiliations among the shareholders listed in the table. The percentage for each beneficial owner is calculated based on (i) the aggregate number of shares reported to be owned by such group or individual and (ii) the aggregate number of shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2016 (81,284,181 shares). The percentages below do not reflect the 8,624 shares of Series C Preferred Stock of the Company currently outstanding, which is the equivalent of 8,624,000 shares of non-voting common stock. If such preferred stock were taken into consideration, the percentage for each beneficial owner shown below would be lower.

 

 


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner



 Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned


 Percentage
of Class


 

 

Peter M. Carlino(1)(2)

   6,757,827   8.27%  

 

 

David E. Carlino(1)

   6,247,592   7.69%  

 

 

Richard J. Carlino(1)

   6,170,750   7.59%  

 

 

Carlino Family Trust(1)

   5,759,316   7.09%  

 

 

Harold Cramer(1)

   6,206,723   7.64%  

 

 

David A. Handler

   150,000   *  

 

 

John M. Jacquemin

   133,595   *  

 

 

Barbara Shattuck Kohn(3)

   51,892   *  

 

 

Ronald J. Naples

      *  

 

 

Jane Scaccetti

   2,000   *  

 

 

Timothy J. Wilmott(4)(5)

   1,407,552   1.73%  

 

 

Jay A. Snowden(4)(5)

   355,498   *  

 

 

Saul V. Reibstein(5)(6)

   56,033   *  

 

 

William J. Fair(4)(5)

   81,498   *  

 

 

Carl Sottosanti(4)(5)

   167,520   *  

 

 

All executive officers and directors as a group (12 persons)(4)(5)

   9,245,610   11.10%  

 

 

Baron Capital Group, Inc.(7)

   7,697,691   9.47%  

 

 

Balyasny Asset Management L.P.(8)

   6,430,155   7.91%  

 

 

Vanguard Group, Inc.(9)

   6,189,992   7.62%  

 

 

PAR Investment Partners, L.P.(10)

   5,941,300   7.31%  

 

 

BlackRock, Inc.(11)

   4,257,416   5.24%  

*
Less than 1%.

Table of Contents

Notes to Security Ownership of Principal
Shareholders and Management Table

(1)
The number of shares shown in the table includes (i) 5,759,316 shares of the Company's common stock owned by an irrevocable trust (the "Carlino Family Trust") for the benefit of Peter D. Carlino (who passed away in November 2013) and Peter D. Carlino's children, as to which Peter M. Carlino has sole voting power for the election of directors and certain other matters and (ii) 365,212 shares owned by a residuary trust (the "Residuary Trust") for the benefit of Peter D. Carlino and Peter D. Carlino's children. Peter M. Carlino, David E. Carlino, Richard J. Carlino and Harold Cramer have shared investment power and shared voting power with respect to certain matters for both the Carlino Family Trust and for all matters for the Residuary Trust. The Carlino Family Trust has pledged an aggregate of 1 million shares as security for loans to the trust and for the benefit of the trust beneficiaries.

(2)
The number of shares in the table includes (i) 5,759,316 shares in the aggregate owned by the Carlino Family Trust and the Residuary Trust, as to which Peter M. Carlino has sole voting power for the election of directors and certain other matters and shared investment power and shared voting power with respect to certain matters and (ii) 420,615 shares that may be acquired by Mr. Carlino upon the exercise of outstanding options.

(3)
The number of shares in the table includes 2,000 shares owned by Ms. Shattuck Kohn's spouse, as to which shares Ms. Shattuck Kohn disclaims beneficial ownership.

(4)
The number of shares in the table includes shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding options, as follows: Mr. Wilmott, 974,096 shares; Mr. Snowden, 328,556, shares; Mr. Reibstein, 40,083; Mr. Fair, 77,498; Mr. Sottosanti, 148,468; and all executive officers and directors as a group, 1,568,701 shares.

(5)
The number of shares in the table includes restricted shares, for which each of the following has voting rights but his disposition rights are currently restricted, as follows: Mr. Wilmott, 10,000 shares; Mr. Snowden, 2,000, shares; Mr. Sottosanti, 1,000; and all executive officers and directors as a group, 13,000 shares.

(6)
The number of shares in the table includes 150 shares owned by Mr. Reibstein's spouse, as to which shares Mr. Reibstein disclaims beneficial ownership.

(7)
Based on its Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 16, 2016, the number of shares in the table includes shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2015 by Baron Capital Group, Inc. and its affiliates, BAMCO, Inc., Baron Capital Management, Inc. and Ronald Baron. The address of BAMCO, Inc. is 767 Fifth Avenue, 49th Floor, New York, NY 10153.

(8)
Based on its Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on March 7, 2016, the number of shares in the table includes shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2015 by Balyasny Asset Management L.P. and its affiliates, Atlas Master Fund, Ltd., Atlas Global, LLC, Atlas Global Investments, Ltd., Atlas Institutional Fund, LLC, Atlas Institutional Fund, Ltd., Atlas Institutional Fund II, LLC, Atlas Institutional Fund II, Ltd., Atlas Global Japan Unit Trust, Atlas Enhanced Master Fund, Ltd., Atlas Enhanced Fund, L.P., Atlas Enhanced Fund, Ltd., Lyxor/Balyasny Atlas Enhanced Fund Limited, BAM Zie Master Fund, Ltd., BAM Zie Fund, LLC, BAM Zie Fund, Ltd., Atlas Fundamental Trading Master Fund Ltd., Atlas Fundamental Trading Fund, L.P., Atlas Fundamental Trading Fund Ltd., Atlas Quantitative Trading Fund, Ltd., and Dmitry Balyasny. The address of Balyasny Asset Management L.P. is 181 West Madison, Suite 3600, Chicago, IL 60602.

(9)
Based on its Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2016, the number of shares in the table includes shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2015 by Vanguard Group, Inc. and

Table of Contents

    its affiliates, Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company and Vanguard Investment Australia, Ltd.. The address of Vanguard Group, Inc. is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.

(10)
Based on its Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 16, 2016, the number of shares in the table includes shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2015 by PAR Investment Partners, L.P. and its affiliates, PAR Group, L.P. and PAR Capital Management, Inc. The address of PAR Investment Partners, L.P. is One International Place, Suite 2401, Boston, MA 02110.

(11)
Based on its Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 27, 2016, the number of shares in the table includes shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2015 by BlackRock, Inc. and its affiliates, BlackRock Advisors, LLC, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG, BlackRock Fund Advisors, BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A., BlackRock International Limited, BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited, BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd and BlackRock Investment Management, LLC. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10022.

Table of Contents


TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

        The Company currently leases 49,928 square feet of executive office and warehouse space for buildings in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania from affiliates of its Chairman of the Board of Directors. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 amounted to $1.2 million, $1.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The leases for the office space all expire in May 2019, and the lease for the warehouse space expired in July 2013 and was extended on a month to month basis. The future minimum lease commitments relating to these leases at December 31, 2015 equaled $4.1 million.

        Eric Schippers, the Senior Vice President of Public Affairs & Government Relations of the Company, is the son-in-law of our Chairman. Mr. Schippers joined the Company in 2003. From 1998 to 2003, Mr. Schippers was President of the Alexandria, Virginia-based Center for Individual Freedom, a non-partisan constitutional advocacy group. Mr. Schippers has also worked for Burson Marsteller, one of the world's largest international public relations firms, representing numerous Fortune 500 clients in the areas of media relations, public affairs, crisis communications and constituency relations. For 2015, Mr. Schippers received a salary of $393,928, a bonus of $282,053 and an award of 61,938 options.

Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons

        Pursuant to the terms of its charter, the Company's Audit Committee reviews and pre-approves all conflicts of interest and related party transactions. For purposes of the Audit Committee's review, related party transactions are transactions, arrangements or relationships where the Company is a participant and in which an executive officer, a director or an owner of 5% or greater of the Company's common stock (or any immediate family member of the foregoing persons) has a direct or indirect material interest. The Company's Code of Conduct has a broad definition of conflict of interest, which includes related party transactions, and requires employees to report potential conflicts to the Chief Compliance Officer. All potential conflicts of interest involving an executive officer, director or 5% or greater shareholder of the Company are communicated by the Chief Compliance Officer (or other members of Company management) to the Vice President of Internal Audit. The Vice President of Internal Audit then consults with members of the legal and finance staffs to determine whether the proposed transaction represents a conflict of interest or a related party transaction that must be presented to the Audit Committee. For transactions determined to require Audit Committee review, the Vice President of Internal Audit collaborates with members of the legal and finance staffs to prepare and present the transaction to the Audit Committee. In terms of standards applied by the Audit Committee in reviewing related party transactions, a director will not participate in the review of transactions in which he or she or his or her immediate family member has an interest. The Audit Committee will only approve related party transactions that are not inconsistent with the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, based on a review of (i) the benefits to the Company of the transaction and (ii) the terms of the transaction and the terms available to or from unrelated third parties, as applicable.

        Currently, the policy to review related party transactions is evidenced in the Audit Committee charter, the Company's Code of Conduct and the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, and certain of the procedures followed in considering related party transactions are based on past practice and the advice of counsel.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

        During 2015, the members of the Company's Compensation Committee were Messrs. Cramer and Handler and Ms. Shattuck Kohn. No executive officer of the Company has served as a director or member of the compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity whose executive officers served as a director or member of the Compensation Committee of the Company.


Table of Contents


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

        The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors consists of Jane Scaccetti (Chair), Harold Cramer, John M. Jacquemin and Barbara Shattuck Kohn, all of whom are independent directors under the NASDAQ Rules. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors that complies with the NASDAQ Rules and is available atwww.pngaming.com/About.

        Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company's financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles, internal controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards, applicable laws and regulations. The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, compensating, overseeing and, where appropriate, discharging and replacing the Company's independent registered public accounting firm (the "independent accounting firm"). The independent accounting firm is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company's audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, the independent accounting firm will express its own opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring and overseeing these processes.

        The Audit Committee members are not professional accountants, and their functions are not intended to duplicate or attest as to the activities of management and the independent accounting firm, nor can the Audit Committee certify that the independent accounting firm is "independent" under applicable rules. The Audit Committee serves a board-level oversight role, in which it provides advice, counsel and direction to management and the independent accounting firm on the basis of the information it receives, discussions with management and the independent accounting firm and the experience of the Audit Committee's members in business, financial and accounting matters.

        In this context, the Audit Committee met and held numerous discussions with management and the independent accounting firm during 2015. Management represented to the Audit Committee that the Company's consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and the independent accounting firm. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent accounting firm matters required to be discussed by the PCAOB Accounting Standard No. 16 Communications with Audit Committee.

        The independent accounting firm also provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by Rule 3526 of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Communications with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with the independent accounting firm the firm's independence.

        Based upon the Audit Committee's discussion with management and the independent accounting firm and the Audit Committee's review of the representations of management and the report of the independent accounting firm on the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board of Directors includeintends to present at the audited consolidated financial statements inAnnual Meeting. The proxy does, however, confer discretionary authority upon the Company'spersons designated as proxy holders on the Proxy Card, or their substitutes, to vote on any other business that may properly come before the meeting.

Who Is Entitled To Vote At The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed with the SEC on March 15, 2016.

Meeting?

Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors

Jane Scaccetti, Chair
John M. Jacquemin
Harold Cramer
Barbara Shattuck Kohn


TableOnly holders of Contents


OTHER MATTERS

        The Company is mailing to all shareholdersrecord of recordour common stock, or their duly appointed proxies, as of the close of business on April 1, 20165, 2024, the Record Date for the Annual Meeting, are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and all postponements or adjournments thereof. Our common stock constitutes the only class of securities entitled to vote at the meeting.

What Are The Voting Rights Of Shareholders?
Each share of common stock outstanding on the Record Date entitles its holder to cast one vote on each matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.
PROPOSALVOTE REQUIREDBROKER DISCRETIONARY ALLOWED?
Election of Class I DirectorsPlurality of Votes CastNo
Ratification of PwCMajority of Votes CastYes
Advisory Vote on Executive CompensationMajority of Votes CastNo
In accordance with the voting standards set forth above, withholds, abstentions and broker non-votes have no effect on any of the proposals.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 95
ABOUT THE MEETING: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
How Can I Attend And Vote At The Annual Meeting?
The Annual Meeting will be held virtually; you will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person. You are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting if you were a copyshareholder as of itsthe close of business on April 5, 2024, the Record Date for the Annual ReportMeeting.
Attending the Annual Meeting: To attend the Annual Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PENN2024. You will be asked to enter the 16-digit control number found on the proxy card or the voting instruction form that accompanied your proxy materials.
Voting During the Annual Meeting: If you are a shareholder as of the Record Date, you may vote during the Annual Meeting by following the instructions available on the meeting website during the meeting.
Technical Support for the Annual Meeting: If you have difficulty accessing the virtual Annual Meeting, Technicians will be available to assist you via the toll-free phone number listed at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PENN2024.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy in advance of the meeting. For information on how to vote prior to the Annual Meeting, see “How Do I Vote Without Attending the Annual Meeting?”
How Do I Vote Without Attending The Annual Meeting?
Voting by Proxy for Shares Registered Directly in the Name of the Shareholder. If you are a shareholder of record, you may instruct the proxy holders named in the Proxy Card how to vote your shares of common stock in one of the following ways:
Vote by Internet. To vote on the Internet, you must go to www.proxyvote.com, have your Notice of Availability, Proxy Card or voting instruction form in hand and follow the instructions. If you vote via the Internet, you do not need to return your Proxy Card.
Vote by Phone. To vote by telephone, you must call the toll-free number listed on your Notice of Availability and/or Proxy Card, have your Notice of Availability, Proxy Card or voting instruction form in hand and follow the instructions. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to return your Proxy Card.
Vote by Mail. To vote by mail, if you have not already received one, you may request a Proxy Card from us as instructed in the Notice of Availability and sign, date and mail the Proxy Card in the postage-paid envelope provided. Properly signed and returned proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained therein.
Voting by Proxy for Shares Held in Street Name. If you are the beneficial owner of shares of common stock held in “street name” (that is, through a bank, broker or other nominee), then you should follow the instructions provided to you by your broker, bank or other nominee.
Will I Be Able To Participate In The Virtual Annual Meeting In The Same Way That I Would Be Able To Participate In An In-Person Annual Meeting?
Yes. We have taken steps to ensure that the format of the virtual Annual Meeting affords shareholders the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. We have also enhanced shareholder access, participation and communication by providing shareholders the ability to submit questions in advance of the meeting.
You may submit a question in advance of the meeting at www.proxyvote.com after logging in with your control number found on your Proxy Card, voting instruction form or Notice of Availability. Questions may also be submitted during the Annual Meeting through www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PENN2024 . The Company will respond to as many inquiries at the Annual Meeting as time allows, although questions may be limited on a per shareholder basis due to time constraints. Off-topic, personal or other inappropriate questions will not be answered.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

96 PROXY STATEMENT - 2024
ABOUT THE MEETING: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
A replay of the meeting, as well as any appropriate questions pertinent to meeting matters and management’s answers that could not be answered during the meeting due to time constraints, will be made publicly available through our investor relations website promptly after the virtual annual meeting.
What Will Constitute A Quorum At The Annual Meeting?
The presence in person (virtually) or by proxy of shareholders entitled to cast a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on any matter at the Annual Meeting as of April 5, 2024 will constitute a quorum, permitting the shareholders to conduct business at the Annual Meeting. As of the April 5, 2024 Record Date, there were 151,867,302 shares of common stock outstanding. If you have returned valid proxy instructions or if you hold your shares of common stock in your own name as a holder of record and attend the Annual Meeting (virtually), your shares will be counted for the purpose of determining whether there is a quorum. We will include abstentions and “broker non-votes” in the calculation of the number of shares of common stock considered to be present at the meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the meeting. If a quorum is not present, the Annual Meeting may be adjourned from time to time to a date not more than 120 days after June 4, 2024, by the vote of a majority of the shares of common stock represented at the Annual Meeting in person (virtually) or by proxy until a quorum has been obtained.
What Are Broker Non-Votes?
A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank, or other nominee holding shares on behalf of a beneficial owner is prohibited from exercising discretionary voting authority for a beneficial owner who has not provided voting instructions. Brokers, banks, and other nominees may vote without instruction only on “routine” proposals. On “non-routine” proposals, nominees cannot vote without instructions from the beneficial owner, resulting in so called “broker non-votes.” Proposal 2, the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, is the only routine proposal on the ballot for the Annual Meeting. All other proposals are non- routine. If you hold your shares with a broker, bank, or other nominee, they will not be voted on non-routine proposals unless you give voting instructions to such nominee.
How Are The Proxy Card Votes Counted?
If the accompanying Proxy Card is properly completed, signed and returned to us, and not subsequently revoked, it will be voted as directed by you. If the Proxy Card is submitted, but voting instructions are not provided, the proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendation for each proposal herein and as recommended by our Board of Directors with regard to any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting, if no such recommendation is given, in the discretion of the proxy holders.
May I Change My Vote After I Submit My Proxy Card?
Yes. You may revoke a previously granted proxy at any time before it is exercised by any of the following actions:
notifying our Secretary in writing that you would like to revoke your proxy; or
attending our Annual Meeting (virtually) and following the instructions available on the meeting website during the meeting.
If your shares of common stock are held on your behalf by a broker, bank or other nominee, you must contact them to receive instructions as to how you may revoke your proxy voting instructions.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 97
ABOUT THE MEETING: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Who Pays The Costs Of Soliciting Proxies?
We will pay the cost of solicitation of proxies. In addition to the solicitation of proxies through the Internet or by mail, our directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone, electronically, by mail or other means, but they will not be specifically compensated for these services. We will also request persons, firms and corporations holding shares in their names or in the names of their nominees, which are beneficially owned by others, to send proxy materials to, and obtain proxies from, such beneficial owners.
We may retain the services of a proxy solicitation firm if, in the Board’s view, it is deemed necessary or advisable. Although we do not currently expect to retain such a firm, we estimate that the fees of such firm could be up to $25,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses, all of which would be paid by us.
What Should I Do If I Received More Than One Notice Of Availability?
There are circumstances under which you may receive more than one Notice of Availability. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive a separate voting instruction card for each such brokerage account. In addition, if you are a shareholder of record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you will receive more than one Notice of Availability. Please authorize your proxy in accordance with the instructions of each Notice of Availability separately, since each one represents different shares that you own.
You should rely only on the information provided in this Proxy Statement. No person is authorized to give any information or to make any representation not contained in this Proxy Statement and, if given or made, you should not rely on that information or representation as having been authorized by us. You should not assume that the information in this Proxy Statement is accurate as of any date other than the date of this Proxy Statement or, where information relates to another date set forth in this Proxy Statement, then as of that date.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT - 2024 A-1
APPENDIX
Appendix A: Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to reporting financial results in accordance with GAAP, the Company also periodically excludes special items to calculate financial metrics utilized for executive compensation plans. The following table includes a reconciliation of net loss, which is determined in accordance with GAAP, to Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR for the year ended December 31, 20152023, which are non-GAAP financial measures reported with “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on pages 43 - 45 of our 2023 Annual Report. The Company believes Adjusted EBITDAR is the financial performance measure most closely linked to the calculation of compensation actually paid and a proxy card together with this Proxy Statement,periodically excludes special items to calculate financial metrics utilized in its executive compensation plans. Special items represent significant charges or the Notice containing instructions on howcredits that are important to access this proxy statement and our annual report and how to vote online. The Board of Directors does not know of any other business that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. Except as the Board of Directors may otherwise permit, only the business set forth and discussed in the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement may be acted on at the Annual Meeting. If any other business does properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof, the proxy holders will vote in regard thereto according to their discretion.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

        Section 16(a)an understanding of the Exchange Act requiresCompany’s ongoing operations. The adjusted amounts used for 2023 STIP compensation purposes differ from the Company's executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of the Company's common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of the Company's common stock and any other equity securities ofadjusted amounts used by the Company with the SEC. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholderselsewhere or which are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on its review of the copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5 furnished to the Company, or written representations from certain reporting persons that no such Forms were required to be filed by such persons, the Company believes that all of its executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders complied with all filing requirements applicable to them during 2015, other than one late filing by each of Tim Wilmott, Jay Snowden and Carl Sottosanti.

Advance Notice Provision

        Under the Company's bylaws, no business may be brought before an annual meeting unless it is specified in the notice of the meeting or is otherwise brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board or by a shareholder who has owned beneficially at least 1% of the Company's common stock for a continuous period of not less than 12 months prior to making the proposal and who has delivered proper written notice to the Company's Secretary (containing certain information specified in the bylaws about the shareholder and the proposed action) not less than 120 nor more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year's annual meeting. Accordingly, proposals with respect to the 2017 annual meeting must be delivered between January 3, 2017 and February 2, 2017. These requirements are separate from and in addition to the SEC's requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a shareholder proposal included in the Company's proxy statement.

Company’s Form 10-K or Annual Report.
STIP Award Metrics: Adjusted EBITDAR Used for Compensation Purposes

Shareholder Proposals

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2023
Net loss(491.4)
Income tax benefit(8.2)
Interest expense, net464.7
Interest income(40.3)
Income from unconsolidated affiliates(25.3)
Gain on Barstool Acquisition, net(83.4)
Gain on REIT transactions, net(500.8)
Other income(5.5)
Operating loss(690.2)
Loss on disposal of Barstool923.2
Stock-based compensation85.9
Cash-settled stock-based award variance(13.8)
Loss on disposal of assets0.1
Contingent purchase price1.9
Depreciation and amortization435.1
Impairment losses130.6
Insurance, recoveries, net of deductible charges(13.9)
Income from unconsolidated affiliates25.3
Non-operating items of equity, method investments7.4
Other expenses29.9
Adjusted EBITDA (1)
921.5
Rent expense associated with triple net operating leases591.1
Adjusted EBITDAR (2)
1,512.6
Adjustments Approved for 2023 Bonus Program (STIP) (3)
384.0
Adjusted EBITDAR Used in 2023 Bonus Program (STIP) (3)
1,896.6
(1)
We define Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest expense, net; interest income; income taxes; depreciation and amortization; stock-based compensation; debt extinguishment charges; impairment losses; insurance recoveries, net of deductible charges; changes in the estimated fair value of our contingent purchase price obligations; gain or loss on disposal of assets; the difference between budget and actual expense for cash-settled stock-based awards; pre-opening expenses; loss on disposal of a business; non-cash gains/losses associated with REIT transactions; non-cash gains/losses associated with partial and step acquisitions as measured in accordance with ASC 805 “Business Combinations;” and other. Adjusted EBITDA is inclusive of income or loss from unconsolidated affiliates, with our share of non-operating items (such as interest expense, net; income taxes; depreciation and amortization; and stock-based compensation expense) added back for Barstool (prior to our acquisition of Barstool on February 17, 2023) and our Kansas Entertainment, LLC joint venture. Adjusted EBITDA is inclusive of rent expense associated with our triple net operating leases with our REIT landlords.
(2)
We define Adjusted EBITDAR as Adjusted EBITDA (as defined above) plus rent expense associated with triple net operating leases (which is a normal, recurring cash operating expense necessary to operate our business).
(3)
Adjustments to the target and achieved performance results for the 2023 STIP calculation of Adjusted EBITDAR only include Interactive segment results for January 1 to June 30, 2023, the period prior to the Company’s decision to enter into a strategic alliance with ESPN, and to exclude Interactive segment results for the period following the Company’s decision to launch ESPN BET.

        Shareholders interested in submitting a proposal for inclusion in the proxy materials for the annual meeting of shareholders in 2017 may do so by following the procedures prescribed in Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act. To be eligible for inclusion, shareholder proposals must be received by the Company's Secretary no later than December 20, 2016. Proposals should be sent to the Company's principal executive office, 825 Berkshire Boulevard, Suite 200, Wyomissing, Pennsylvania 19610, directed to the attention of the Secretary.

Householding of Proxy Materials

        Certain shareholders who share the same address may receive only one copy of the Proxy Statement and the 2016 Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2015 in accordance with a notice delivered from such shareholders' bank, broker or other holder of record, unless the applicable bank, broker or other holder of record received contrary instructions. This practice, known as



Table of ContentsTABLE OF CONTENTS

"householding," is designed to reduce printing and postage costs. Shareholders owning their shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record who wish to either discontinue or commence householding may request or discontinue householding, or may request a separate copy of the Notice and, if applicable, the Proxy Statement or the Annual Report, either by contacting their bank, broker or other holder of record at the telephone number or address provided in the above referenced notice, or contacting the Company by telephone at (610) 373-2400 or in writing at 825 Berkshire Boulevard, Suite 200, Wyomissing, Pennsylvania 19610, Attention: Secretary. Shareholders who are requesting to commence or discontinue householding should provide their name, the name of their broker, bank or other record holder, and their account information.

April 19, 2016

By order of the Board of Directors

Carl Sottosanti
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary




VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC. 825 BERKSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 200 WYOMISSING, PA 19610 ELECTRONIC DELIVERYTABLE OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Penn National Gaming, Inc. in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access shareholder communications electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. For Withhold For All Except To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the AllAll The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: nominee(s) on the line below. 0 0 0 1. Election of two Class II directors to serve until the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their respective successors are elected and qualified to serve. Nominees 01 Barbara Shattuck Kohn 02 Ronald J. Naples The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3: 2Ratification of the selection Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the 2016 fiscal year. 3Advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers. For 0 0 Against 0 0 Abstain 0 0 NOTE: At their discretion, the named proxies are authorized to consider and vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. 0 For address change/comments, mark here. (see reverse for instructions) Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by an authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date 0000284134_1 R1.0.1.25CONTENTS

GRAPHIC





Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com . PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC. ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS, JUNE 2, 2016 The shareholder(s) whose signature(s) appear(s) on the reverse side of this Proxy Form hereby appoint(s) Peter M. Carlino and Timothy J. Wilmott, and each of them, as attorneys and proxies, with full power of substitution, to vote on behalf of the shareholder(s) all of the shares of Common Stock of Penn National Gaming, Inc. (the "Company"), which the shareholder(s) would be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders thereof to be held on June 2, 2016 and at any and all postponements and adjournments thereof, upon the matters listed on the reverse side. WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED HEREIN. WHERE A VOTE IS NOT SPECIFIED, THE PROXIES WILL VOTE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY FOR ALL NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR, FOR PROXY ITEM NOS. 2 AND 3, AND WILL VOTE IN THEIR DISCRETION ON SUCH OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING AND AT ANY ADJOURNMENT OF SUCH MEETING. Address change/comments: (If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) Continued and to be signed on reverse side 0000284134_2 R1.0.1.25

GRAPHIC


0000921738 penn:ValueOfDividendsOrOtherEarningsPaidOnStockOrOptionAwardsNotOtherwiseReflectedInFairValueOrTotalCompensationMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31